News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Can someone explain to me the difference between Cain and Clinton - RightNation.US

Jump to content

It is funny how the MSM is telling us how a serial adulterer can't be trusted and would not make a good President. When Clinton was found out to be the MSM was telling us how a serial adulterer had traits that would make him a good President.

So besides Herman Cain being an African-American Republican who left the plantation what is the difference between them?

3 Comments On This Entry

If someone is a serial adulterer he'd have trouble being elected as a Republican because Republicans have morals. The issue is irrelevant to Democrats because if they do have morals they only expect people they disagree with to live by them.
The difference is that Clinton HAD to be protected because he was one of them. Cain must be destroyed unmercifully because he destroys their talking points that Republicans are racists and want black people to die.
One was and "is" guilty, and one is being framed.
Page 1 of 1

Recent Entries

0 user(s) viewing

0 Guests
0 member(s)
0 anonymous member(s)