Conservatives Left Standing At the Altar
Posted by ilja, Jan 26 2008, 04:19 PM in Politics
In the beginning, the candidates we had to choose from were mostly like the guys you went to elementary, middle and high school with whom you had known all your life. You know how after awhile, you've dated a few, had crushes on a couple but mostly you feel like you know them all so well that you think of them more as brothers than possible love interests. Not to mention the fact that you've been through so much together that there's some bad blood between you and a couple of them that you could never entirely forget.
Let's take a look at each of them.
First, there was Rudy. He was the first candidate to ride high in the polls and as far as Fox News was concerned, the race was all but over. Which was part of what scared you so bad if like myself, you considered abortion murder. Sure you loved the way he led New York after the 9/11 attacks and you even admired the way he brought crime down during his tenure as Mayor. You did know he use to be Mayor of New York, didn't you?
But to you that was like loving your high-school basketball star who made the final basket to win the big game by one point. While he will always hold a special place in your heart, you can't dismiss the fact that he was also a man-slut who had slept around with everything and anything that wore a dress and for all you know maybe even a few who didn't since after all, he has been known to wear one a time or two himself. You just don't trust him and you have no respect for his morals or lack thereof.
Then there was Mitt. While he is great eye-candy and that is putting it mildly . . . er . . . what were we talking about . . . oh yeah, that was also part of what bothered you about him. Oh yes, you admired the way he turned around the Olympics in Utah and you especially admired his strong family values and beautiful wife and children. You also admired the great success he has had in life in all of his business ventures. But this was also part of what made you question him. Just what would he do to succeed? How far would he go to get what he wanted? Besides, he use to be one way and now he's another. Or at least that is your impression of him. Not to mention the fact that he seems to have brought pander to a whole new art form.
He reminds you of the guy in High School who won every superlative there was to give. He was the star quarterback, Class President, Salutatorian, voted Best-Looking and most likely to succeed. He dated and married the Prom Queen and of course he was the Prom King. He just seemed to get everything he ever wanted and while you admired him, that made him anything but approachable. He was not one of you and never would be therefore he could not possibly understand where you are coming from since he's never been there.
Next there was McCain. Ugh. Sure he was a POW and you do admire him for surviving that horrid experience not to mention you will always be grateful to him for serving his country. There's just a special pedestal where you place those who have served for your freedom. But John McCain is a media prostitute who would do anything and I do mean anything for face time in front of a camera. Unfortunately, the only reason he is so loved by the MSM is because he can always be counted on to be the burr in anything Conservatives find really important. Besides, look what happened the last time we chose a Republican Presidential candidate because it was his turn. Can you say Bob Dole?
McCain is like the guy in high school who always seemed to come in second best to guys like Mitt and yet he had done his part for the team. He played defense which of course he was well suited for what with his extreme temper. While he did a pretty good job, since he was not the one to score, he never got the attention that he thought he deserved. Therefore, he walked around with a chip on his shoulder. While you might have tried to befriend him unless you treated him as if his caca didn't stink, he wouldn't give you the time of day. Therefore, he was never one that you would have ever considered possible dating material.
And yes, John McCain, it was AMNESTY!
Next up is Ron Paul. While Ron Paul is one of the most trustworthy candidates there is, at least I believe that he really believes what he is saying most of the time, I have been quite offended by his accusations that we would not have been attacked on September 11th if we had not been in Saudi Arabia. Which somewhat leads to why I could not support Ron Paul, his stance on fighting terrorism by not fighting at all. I believe we should finish the job in Iraq at least as much as is possible in what we can control.
Yet, Ron Paul and some of his more sane followers have taught me quite a bit and I feel myself sliding more and more in agreement with libertarians.
So who does he remind me of from high school? I would have to say that he reminds me of one of those guys that use to hang out in shop class all day. You know the type. They were fabulous at fixing anything that went wrong with your wheels but unless you were into partaking of illegal substances, you were wise to never date them. How does this relate to Ron Paul, you ask? Can we say legalized drugs?
Then there was the surprise top tier candidate, Mike Huckabee. Would you believe there was a time that I could have been a very strong supporter of this man? Of course, there was also a time that I didn't know much about him except I liked him from his interviews on TV and I knew he was very strong on life issues. Unfortunately for Mr. Huckabee, by the time he did rise up from the ashes, I had already learned too much about his liberal stances on taxes and illegal immigration to give him any serious considerations.
Huckabee reminds me of the class clown. He can be a blast to be around and is always good for a laugh but other than being a friend, who would really take him seriously? At least high school teenage girls wouldn't since they are all about drama and angst. Guys like Mike never knew how to dance and definitely didn't know how to woo a lady. They were band members who were a bit geekish even if they were funny. Sure they had the other girls in the band to play around with, if you know what I mean, but I wasn't in the band. Okay, so I'm exaggerating just a tad but hey, you try writing one of these.
So given all of the above, is there any wonder that a Conservative would start looking elsewhere for the man of her dreams?
Which brings us to Fred Dalton Thompson.
The first reason I started looking around was because of Rudy being so high in the polls that it scared me to death that I would not have a Presidential candidate to vote for who did not believe it was okay to take the life of an innocent unborn baby. Then of course, the more I learned about the other candidates, the more desperate I became. So when rumors started flying that Fred Thompson might consider running, I naturally got extremely excited because if he did run, I would finally have a viable conservative for whom I could vote.
It was like meeting a guy from another school who had all the qualities you were looking for in a fella without all the baggage like those whom you had always known. He said all the right things and not only that but had the reputation to back them up. Shoot, even his exes talked glowingly about him and how often does that happen?
Sure you might have been a little hesitant at first since you had been there before but after awhile, you just knew he was the one. You were ready to commit and could hardly wait for the big day. He taught you things that you had never known before and made you want to learn even more and more about the Constitution and a new-fangled concept called Federalism.
Yes, there were some major bumps along the way but you thought y'all had worked past them or at least were working past the major ones and things were finally starting to look up.
Which is probably part of the reason you took it so hard when he left you standing at the altar. You were thinking you were on your way when suddenly he quit. Not only did he drop you but he did it by sending you a 'Dear John' letter.
Is it any wonder you are so heart-broken? You had so many hopes and dreams tied up with this man and now, you were back at square one left with the previous fellas whom you had already discounted for all the reasons already cited. Not only did none of them reach your standards, in the past few months, the more you learned about them, the more you saw just how right you were that they were all wrong for you.
And now that you had experienced your Knight in Shining Armor, your Sir Lancelot, how could you possibly settle for something, someone so much less? No one measures up to Fred's 6'6" height.
So here you are looking at the leftovers and just not having the appetite for even a snack. Oh the pain of being a jilted voter. Someone remind me next time to not get so involved in the dating scene. Someone remind me next time just to sit back and watch during the primaries so I can keep from getting my hopes up so high where I won't have to experience these pangs of a broken-heart again.
Oh Fred, where art thou?
Elusively yours,
ilja
Comments
#1
Bullzeye, Jan 26 2008, 04:54 PM
Mr. Naron, Jan 26 2008, 05:02 PM
I knew two guys like that in high school. One of them was honest and humble. He and I were good friends. The other was as fake as a snowman at Disneyland.
Mitt Romney is a snowman from Anaheim.
Jax, Jan 26 2008, 05:25 PM
Mitt Romney is a snowman from Anaheim.
Are you sure of that Chris? Absolutely sure? I certainly understand why people are skeptical. He wasn't my first choice either. But having discussed him at some length with someone who spent a fair amount of time with him, and whose opinion I generally trust, and having read up a bit more on him, I'm seeing him more as the former than the latter. Am I absolutely sure? No. I'm not. But how can you be?
Ilja - spectacular analogy. And pretty well representative of my feelings on the candidates as well. Although, I see Paul more as the intellectual -- the Chemistry or Chess Club guy who's intriguing but a little awkward and geeky, and often hard to relate to, even though you respect his intelligence. You get the sense that HE knows what he's talking about, but YOU don't always. (IMG:http://www.rightnation.us/forums/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
JaneNC, Jan 26 2008, 05:38 PM
Well, I am suspect of Fred now...go to his sites and see alot of McCain propaganda. If he endorses McAmnesty, then he lied to us all. We were snookered.
At this juncture we have a choice.
McKennedy aka McAmnesty or Mitt Romney
I think Mitt would be a good President. He is so smart, articulate and he is the most conservative one left.
The GOP needs to get behind the guy and stop the incessant bitching.
sunangel1776, Jan 26 2008, 06:07 PM
You spoke for me once more. McCain is not my man even though he is my senator. Now that Fred is not running, Mitt is my second choice. I will vote for McCain over the Dems.
USNJIMRET, Jan 26 2008, 10:13 PM
You have arrived!!
My God lady, what an incredible piece!!
Outstanding and, as Jax said (who I respect greatly BTW) spectacular!!
And as someone else said, my feelings in a nutshell.
Now I need to think more about who is left and who to support as the lesser of two poor choices.
Mitt's looking slightly less offensive to me for the moment.
OK, that's not totally honest. McCain is NOT a conservative, and I am. That makes the choice easier.
Mr. Naron, Jan 26 2008, 10:20 PM
Mitt Romney is a snowman from Anaheim.
Are you sure of that Chris? Absolutely sure? I certainly understand why people are skeptical. He wasn't my first choice either. But having discussed him at some length with someone who spent a fair amount of time with him, and whose opinion I generally trust, and having read up a bit more on him, I'm seeing him more as the former than the latter. Am I absolutely sure? No. I'm not. But how can you be?
Ilja - spectacular analogy. And pretty well representative of my feelings on the candidates as well. Although, I see Paul more as the intellectual -- the Chemistry or Chess Club guy who's intriguing but a little awkward and geeky, and often hard to relate to, even though you respect his intelligence. You get the sense that HE knows what he's talking about, but YOU don't always. (IMG:http://www.rightnation.us/forums/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
His campaigning in Michigan is how I know. He said exactly what he needed to say to win. If that's not phony, I don't know what is.
Josh Painter, Jan 27 2008, 08:49 PM
At this juncture we have a choice.
McKennedy aka McAmnesty or Mitt Romney
I think Mitt would be a good President. He is so smart, articulate and he is the most conservative one left.
The GOP needs to get behind the guy and stop the incessant bitching.
That's strange, JaneNC, because Fred only has one website - http://www.fred08.com/Index.aspx - I just checked it, and there's no McCain propaganda there whatsoever.
Could you please point us to some specific sites, i.e., with links?
Thanks,
- JP
Josh Painter, Jan 27 2008, 08:58 PM
Mitt Romney is a snowman from Anaheim.
Romney is the polar opposite of Fred Thompson. Amazing to me how folks see Mitt as being somehow a better choice than McCain, as if a flip-flopping liar with no core principles is preferable to a backstabber. To me, the Fatally Flawed Four RINOs are equally despicable. There isn't a clothes pin strong enough to block out the stench of voting for any of them. (IMG:http://www.rightnation.us/forums/style_emoticons/default/puke.gif)
Attila, Jan 27 2008, 11:42 PM
Mitt Romney is a snowman from Anaheim.
Romney is the polar opposite of Fred Thompson. Amazing to me how folks see Mitt as being somehow a better choice than McCain, as if a flip-flopping liar with no core principles is preferable to a backstabber. To me, the Fatally Flawed Four RINOs are equally despicable. There isn't a clothes pin strong enough to block out the stench of voting for any of them. (IMG:http://www.rightnation.us/forums/style_emoticons/default/puke.gif)
Exactly! That is why I'm leaning toward not bothering to waste my time come Nov. 08. I'm tired of the lessor of two evils, and the third party candidates are representing ideas I can't completely support either so they'll not get my support. They've all got warts aplenty, and voting for any of them gets down to which one can do the least amount of damage to the country as a whole. I already know what the Dims can, and want to do. Just as I already know what R. Paul, and McLame will do.
I don't want anything to do with either. One has a ridiculous foreign policy while the other's domestic ideas pretty much end US sovereignty. Both support things I believe to be precursors to a death knell for our continued existence as a Constitutional Republic. Though they represent different areas of their policies, I cannot now, nor ever support either.
That leaves either of Rudy, Mitt, or the Huckster. Of those three, either Rudy, or Mitt would probably do the least amount of damage. The Huckster just has that "something" that is just too reminiscent of Jimmuh Carter that I couldn't support him for diddly. I wouldn't want to be party to inflicting a republican version of a Jimmuh Carter administration on the country.
If I were to bother leaving the house in Nov. 08, I'd have to hope it would be to vote for either of those two people Mitt, or Rudy. Then again, this whole affair is turning out to be freakishly similar to 1996, when we had a similar choice between candidates who inspired mediocrity.
To paraphrase an old Christmas song, "It's beginning to feel a lot like 'a Dole 1996' election". Sadly, I actually think the party elites have had something to do with it in addition to the seditious MSM because they're still pissed about the base getting angry about the Amnesty - Remember they've (Politicians) had their pockets filled by the Big business cheap labor interests, and really, really want to please their retirement trust funders.
This election is a conundrum for me. It may be the last one I have a chance to participate in, but I cannot stare at myself in the mirror, and still vote for any of these existing candidates who are pretty much diametrically opposed to so many of my beliefs regardless of their supposed qualifications. Their warts make me too ill to leave my home.
Mr. Naron, Jan 28 2008, 12:27 PM
Mitt Romney is a snowman from Anaheim.
Romney is the polar opposite of Fred Thompson. Amazing to me how folks see Mitt as being somehow a better choice than McCain, as if a flip-flopping liar with no core principles is preferable to a backstabber. To me, the Fatally Flawed Four RINOs are equally despicable. There isn't a clothes pin strong enough to block out the stench of voting for any of them. (IMG:http://www.rightnation.us/forums/style_emoticons/default/puke.gif)
Exactly! That is why I'm leaning toward not bothering to waste my time come Nov. 08. I'm tired of the lessor of two evils, and the third party candidates are representing ideas I can't completely support either so they'll not get my support. They've all got warts aplenty, and voting for any of them gets down to which one can do the least amount of damage to the country as a whole. I already know what the Dims can, and want to do. Just as I already know what R. Paul, and McLame will do.
I don't want anything to do with either. One has a ridiculous foreign policy while the other's domestic ideas pretty much end US sovereignty. Both support things I believe to be precursors to a death knell for our continued existence as a Constitutional Republic. Though they represent different areas of their policies, I cannot now, nor ever support either.
That leaves either of Rudy, Mitt, or the Huckster. Of those three, either Rudy, or Mitt would probably do the least amount of damage. The Huckster just has that "something" that is just too reminiscent of Jimmuh Carter that I couldn't support him for diddly. I wouldn't want to be party to inflicting a republican version of a Jimmuh Carter administration on the country.
If I were to bother leaving the house in Nov. 08, I'd have to hope it would be to vote for either of those two people Mitt, or Rudy. Then again, this whole affair is turning out to be freakishly similar to 1996, when we had a similar choice between candidates who inspired mediocrity.
Though I'm a Ron Paul Supporter, I have to say this is quite rational.
USNRETWIFE, Jan 30 2008, 10:06 AM
That Expendable Guy, Jan 30 2008, 12:28 PM
Now I know, I mean really know, how you felt about RG, Ilja. You've said repeatedly that you can't imagine voting for him should he have become the nominee, which is now not happening. I wrote that I would hold my nose even for McCain, and you know what? Now that push might come to shove, I don't know if I can do it if he ends up the nominee. When I wrote that I'd vote even for him, I must admit I thought there was no chance of his becoming the nominee. I despise McCain and nearly everything he stands for.
Well, at least I live in a state that doesn't matter at all. NY's electoral votes are the Dem's no matter what. Usually I bemoan the fact that it doesn't matter at ll how I vote in my state, but the flipside to the unhappiness of not mattering when you care who wins, is that you can absolve yourself of any harm to the Republican nominee when you don't care. Which is what the case will be with a candidate McCain.
I guess you have to walk the other's shoes sometimes, and this is a perfect example of this. I've learned something about myself; there really IS a limit to how far I'll go to rally behind the Republican nominee, and McCain is that limit. So now I can appreciate that for you, Rudy was the limit, and that it's not unacceptable to have limits of that kind. Hold my nose? That won't help if you're standing hip deep in backed up raw sewage--ie, McCain. Maybe that's how you felt about RG.



























