The Conservative Mindcleaner

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Rating 4

3 user(s) viewing

3 guest(s)
0 member(s)
0 anonymous member(s)
MSN.com

Features and Blog Roll









Got a question for a therapist, but don't have the time or money for therapy?
Go to AskMrPlew.com to talk with a licensed psychotherapist via email about
issues such as family problems, parenting, school struggles, relationship
trouble, ADHD/ADD, conflict resolution, etc


What Folks Are Saying About The Conservative Mindcleaner:

Jonah Goldberg of National Review says:

"Uh Oh!"

Vox Day says: "A man after my own heart"

Chris's thought-provoking commentary and his sensible conservatism keeps California from falling further to the left and disappearing into the Pacific. He's a teacher, football fan and an all-around down to earth guy.

-Leland Lyerla (The Southern Illinoisian Sports)

To add your testimonial, email me at chris.naron@gmail.com

Unregistered Guests ARE now ABLE to Comment!



Features
Contact Me: chris.naron@gmail.com

Blogs

Wild Game: Hunt at your peril

A Patriot's History of The United States
Vox Popoli
IowaHawk
Big Government
Big Hollywood
Rachel Lucas
Ace of Spades
I'll Lay Down My Glasses
The Corner
Liberal Fascism
THE TYGRRRR EXPRESS
Stuff Christians Like
Claremont Conservative
WagToons
Lileks
Evangelical Outpost
The Republitarian Register
Elusively Yours
MIn TheGap



Righter's Blog Archive (Old School)


Barrels of Fish...for Shooting
Jonathan Merritt (Green Baptist)
Pandagon
The New Republic
Atrios
Dailykos
Feministe

Domestic Pets
Brain Halitosis Therapy
Mental Floss
Dilbert Blog
Y Safle


A Very Cool Blog on the Writing Business: Real, working authors giving advice...
The Friday Challenge: Bruce Bethke

Mindcleaner Mania Daily Trivia Tournament


Cartoon Cleaner--Political Cartoons by Rightnation Artists...

David Allen's Blog

News Voyager

The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

World Net Daily

Townhall

912 Project Profile

New! Learn How to Use Google Like a Pro!
Googletutor


Search My Blog



Shortest Movie Reviews Ever

Prince Caspian: It was as good as the first Narnia movie. Eddie Izzard as Reepicheep--genius.
Iron Man: Best superhero movie by a long shot. Robert Downey Jr. proves that he's one of the best actors of his generation and he does it in an action flick. It will do for him what Pirates did for Johnny Depp.
X-Men 3: didn't suck one iota. What the hell do we want from our movies every time out, Citzen Cane? I hope not.
A History of Vilolence: I appreciate when porn has a plot, but not really a fan. Sorry.
Freedomland: Weird movie. Longest monologues I've ever seen in a film. Julliane Moore always looks like she's crying.
Just Like Heaven: Surprisingly good. Reese Witherspoon is cute and the lead male actor is funny. I liked the message about not giving up on life.
The Lion The Witch and the Wardrobe: Best of the year. Definitely in my all time top five.
Christmas With the Cranks: I read Skipping Christmas, but I'll spare you the comparisons. What a great illustration of Classical Republicanism.
Chicken Little: Took Lo-Lo to her first movie, so I have no idea what it was about.
Robots: Watched it at my mom's, so I have no idea what it was about.
Crash: I know it's LA and all, but not that much happens in a year. Good movie.
Alexander: Be Cool was more accurate historically. And more interesting. And less gay.
Man of the House: Tommy Lee Jones. Hot cheerleaders. Plus the characteristic theme of Man of the House is the stasis, and eventually the genre, of poststructuralist language.
Miss Congeniality 2: I refuse to admit watching this and laughing a few times.
The Pacifier: Ditto.
Cinderella Man: Great movie. Very inspiring story. Breaks your heart if you have kids.
War of the Worlds: Very good. Tim Robbins gets taken into a room and beat to death. What could be better?
The Aviator: Show me all the blueprints, Show me all the blueprints, Show me all the blueprints, Show me all the blueprints, Show me all the blueprints, Show me all the blueprints... Howard Hughs was cool nutjob.
THX 1138: Uh, you think the Star War Prequals were bad... Even Duval couldn't redeem this glorified student film.
Racing Stripes: racing cripes! racing tripe! Even my kids got bored.
The Longest Yard: I liked it, but comedies with hip hop artists are now on my list of movie genres I won't see at the theater...along with horror.
Revenge of the Sith: Seven year old inner child 1... Jaded 35 year old 0. This one will get Lucas out of a few minutes of pergatory.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind: Not nearly as good as Being John Malkovich. Kind of predictable, too.
Spanglish: James L. Brooks always delivers
Mr. 3000: Bernie Mac is usually funny. Meh.
Napoleon Dynamite: Probably the coolest movie ever. Gahhh.
Be Cool: Be crap.
I Robot: Okay. Will Smith was awful.
A Day Without a Mexican: The Mexican version of The Judas Project or Left Behind
Return of the King (Extended): Outstanding
The Chronicles of Riddick: Not bad
Garden State: Merde
Friday Night Lights: I cried (seriously)
Meet the Fockers: Hoffman good
The Village: Not real scary, but cool

The-Movie-Times.com

Favorite Quote

"They win in the dark; we win in the light."

Ann Coulter


Mindcleaning Books

What books are responsible for what you see on this page? Here's a small list:

The Gospels

Genesis

Proverbs and Ecclesiastes

Paul's Letter to the Romans

Paul's Epistles

(The rest of the Word)

The Screwtape Letters (C.S. Lewis)

The Pilgrim's Progress (John Bunyan)

The Conservative Mind (Russel Kirk)

The Road to Serfdom (F.A. Hayek)

The Closing of the American Mind (Alan Bloom)

The Kingdom of the Cults (Walter Martin)

Till We Have Faces (C.S. Lewis)

The Lord of the Rings (J.R.R. Tolkien)

Lonesome Dove (Larry McMurtry)

The Ancient Near East (ed. Pritchard)

Animal Farm (George Orwell)

Lad: A Dog (Albert Payson Terhune)

There are many more, but this is a good indication of what's rattling around in my brain. There's quite a bit of Leftist stuff in there from my college and grad school days, but it gets the crap beat out of it on a regular basis.

What is The Conservative Mindcleaner?

First Posted on Wed Jan 14, 2004

This blog is the dumping ground for my brain, not some nefarious mind control scheme. By cleaning my mind, I may find entertaining and perhaps, informative thoughts to share with all of you. Truth be told, I'm nervous because you all might see how little there is in my mind.

Anyway, this is my way of talking about all the stuff I want to without having to find someone to listen. See, I'm a bit opinionated. Even my mom thinks so. (Aren't moms supposed to find that cute?) I need to vent my opinions in order to spare my lovely wife, my swell kids and longsuffering friends and co-workers the constant stream of information and analysis I produce.

We're going to talk about politics, education, music, religion, pop culture and sports. I am a Christian conservative-high school teacher-metal head-football fan. For example, if this were week Four of the now waning NFL season, I might have written the following lament: Why do the Raiders have to play their rivals on Monday night? (relax, I know why) Why couldn't they play Chicago or Cleveland on MNF? The Raiders would easily beat them, and I wouldn't have to throw things and children at the TV. After the Raider's losses to both teams, you would have the Raider-hating pleasure of reading my rationalizations beginning with, "what had happened was..." But you won't have to worry too much about that. I'll save most of my rare football rants for next year’s Pop Warner action. My eight-year old handled his business.

I will often bring up the classroom because I'm a History teacher, but only to point out some bureaucratic nonsense or PC thuggery. Public schools are to political junkies what crack is to actual junkies: a cheap source from which to get one's fix. More often, I will make lame attempts to apply what I am currently reading to the day's events. I have a habit of reading books that are so far over my head that I have to read one sentence at a time, take a nap, then read the next sentence. In fact, the title of this blog is a play on Russell Kirk's The Conservative Mind, a perfect example of a book that's way over my head. Most often, I will throw out one of those completely weird connections I make between one thing and another that fooled my grade school principle into thinking I was gifted. What a sucker!

Lastly, I want the readers of this blog to know I am deeply humbled to be a part of your lives for as much or as little time as you can stand me. I will anticipate your feedback as a child does a Christmas present.

My mind is clean.


104 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Entries in February 2010

Happy 99th Mr. President

Posted by Mr. Naron, Feb 6 2010, 07:15 PM



My Mind is Clean


Now Are You Stupid Enough to Vote for Meg Whitman?

Posted by Mr. Naron, Feb 2 2010, 09:59 PM

The Washington Post reports that Meg Whitman is an idiot...

QUOTE
Republican gubernatorial hopeful Meg Whitman is severing ties with an elected official who described himself as a "proud racist."


Well, I added the "idiot" part, but that's called the power of inference. If she can't stand behind a supporter who merely illustrated the absurdity of calling everyone who stands up for the flag and the English language a racist with an unfortunate turn of phrase, then she's an idiot.

Of course, she's getting the bulk of support from California Republicans--big surprise, and she's likely to get even more as her main competitor for the nomination, Steve Poizner, whines about about how mean she's being to him. I guess he could have a point about her underhanded tactics, but a real man doesn't call a press conference and run crying to the FBI because some chick threatens to "tear" you up. You tell her to shut up and fix you a turkey pot pie.

Now, if there are any of you out there toying with the idea of supporting or even voting for Meg "Arnold in a Skirt" Whitman, I must remind you of this...



Don't be one of the stupid people who make the "lesser of two evils" argument in her favor.

My Mind is Clean


Vote For My Son John

Posted by Mr. Naron, Feb 1 2010, 07:20 PM

No, not my son, John. The movie, My Son John.

A couple of weeks ago, Turner Classic Movies ran a whole day's worth of Cold War era films like The Prize and I Was a Communist for the FBI. I've got them on the DVR, but I haven't watched them yet. I was intrigued by the synopsis for My Son John, so I watched it first. As always, Robert Osborne came out and introduced the film. Talk about poisoning the well. The following is a short review from Chicago Reader, not from Osborne himself, bit it's eerily similar in its hyperbolic tone...

QUOTE
An appalling masterpiece. Resist the temptation to laugh at the film's violent anticommunism and try to see it as the audiences of 1952 did, and you'll experience the most wrenching right-wing film ever made. The film's propaganda is all the more powerful because director Leo McCarey refuses to acknowledge any intellectual, ideological intent: his argument is wholly emotional, and it is a powerful one. Robert Walker, fresh from Strangers on a Train, is a government worker who signs with the reds in oedipal revolt against his domineering, patriotic father (Dean Jagger); Helen Hayes is the mother who must choose between son and country




Seriously, that's pretty much what Osborne said. He even scoffed at the fact that the movie was nominated for a Best Story Oscar saying that there was nothing entertaining about the film because of its heavy-handed anti-communism. Contrast the treatment of The Grapes of Wrath, as pro-government a piece of propaganda if there ever was one. I see this movie several times a year, so I'm quite familiar with its subtleties and not so subtleties. Believe me, it's meant to leave you cheering for the New Deal and despising capitalism. What's more is the fact that the author of the book upon which it was based, John Steinbeck, was employed by the Federal Writer's Project. If anything was propagandistic, it was The Grapes of Wrath. And as far as the performances go, most of them are just plain corny.

There's no question that The Grapes of Wrath is more highly regarded than My Son John because of its message.

But what accounts for the fact that the latter is almost impossible to view anymore? It hasn't been released on DVD, and the TCM showing the other day was the first time since the 70s it has been on TV. You would think with the cast, the director and the Oscar nomination, it would at least be as easy to track down as Stop or My Mom Will Shoot.

One has to conclude that given what we know today about actual Soviet spies in our government during the early days of the Cold war that Hollywood is too embarrassed to allow this prescient film anything more than the rare showing on an obscure cable channel.

I recommend that both of my readers go to the TCM website and vote for My Son John to be released on DVD. If it ever gets released, you will be treated to one of the finest portrayals of a mother. Theater legend, Helen Hayes--one of the only actresses to ever win an Oscar, Emmy, Grammy and Tony award--is funny, spontaneous and tragic as the mother of the communist spy. Her performance alone is worth the trouble of demanding that this film be released.

P.S. If you're really fired up about this and have John Nolte of Big Hollywood as one of your Facebook friends, fire off a link to this post. wink.gif

My Mind is Clean


Entries in January 2010

How Does a Christian Woman Get a Man?

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 28 2010, 06:23 PM


She was a babe! All the young men of Skopje blew it.

More straight talk from the Blogfather...

QUOTE
First, you can't simply wave off the looks aspect. That's the single most important element of a woman's attractiveness to men, not so much where you rate on the 1-10 scale, but rather what sort of signals you are using your appearance to send. Most women make it very clear that they dress to please other women, not men, so if you do the opposite you will definitely stand out. I'm not talking about "going to a nightclub on Miami Beach" clothing, as much as I personally like that style, but rather wearing your hair long and down, wearing clothes that flatter most of whatever assets you happen to have, ignoring whatever the latest styles are, and paying far more attention to what the men around you happen to think looks good on you than you do to what your female friends tell you.


Good advice. In my experience, Christian women who dedicate themselves to ministry well into their 30s tend to adopt the Church Lady look, and that look varies from church to church and denomination to denomination. But they all share elements of modesty to the point of unflattering.

He goes on to give his standard "make eye contact" advice, which is sound. But this is a bit sketchy...

QUOTE
I strongly suggest taking up a hobby or two that is male dominated. You'll meet lots of men at martial arts studios, gaming stores, sports bars on game nights, car shows, and the free weight room. Set aside one evening a week to adventure into alien territory and you'll meet more new men in a month than you have in the last year. I've never quite understood how people try to meet the opposite sex in places that the opposite sex never goes.


That's a very narrow list from a guy who obviously values those activities. I would imagine that most ministry-minded women belatedly on the prowl would be horrified at the the thought of entering a dojo or a squat rack pit. If she's not already smoking hot and fit, the latter will be a disaster. And the gaming stores? Does he want her to lose an eye on an errant attack roll precipitated by her noobian disruption of an ownage train?

Of course, now that I've poked a hole in the advice, I don't really have any suggestions of my own. I guess a co-ed softball team might work. You don't have to be too much of a jock to do that. Christian rock concerts are going to have a few single dudes in their 30s still trying to get signed by a label no one will ever hear of. Other than that, I'm stumped.

Any suggestions? Anecdotes on how you avoided being the next Mother Theresa or male equivalent thereof?



My Mind is Clean


Fear the White People Rapping About Economics

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 25 2010, 10:11 PM

Now, I happen to think the following video is terrific. However, if any of you think it would be an excellent tool to reach young people--say, my two periods of Economics for instance--you'd be wrong. There's no way they'd be impressed because the words actually mean something. Not just Tupac something, I mean really something. As in actual coherent thoughts. In other words, kids won't be able to make up what they think the words mean because the words refer to actual economic theories and not some pseudo poetic string of consciousness.

Having said that, I can't wait to make them watch it.


click bottom of picture to see video

QUOTE
We’ve been going back and forth for a century
[Keynes] I want to steer markets,
[Hayek] I want them set free
There’s a boom and bust cycle and good reason to fear it
[Hayek] Blame low interest rates.
[Keynes] No… it’s the animal spirits
[Keynes Sings:]
John Maynard Keynes, wrote the book on modern macro
The man you need when the economy’s off track, [whoa]
Depression, recession now your question’s in session
Have a seat and I’ll school you in one simple lesson
BOOM, 1929 the big crash
We didn’t bounce back—economy’s in the trash
Persistent unemployment, the result of sticky wages
Waiting for recovery? Seriously? That’s outrageous!
I had a real plan any fool can understand
The advice, real simple—boost aggregate demand!
C, I, G, all together gets to Y
Make sure the total’s growing, watch the economy fly
We’ve been going back and forth for a century
[Keynes] I want to steer markets,
[Hayek] I want them set free
There’s a boom and bust cycle and good reason to fear it
[Hayek] Blame low interest rates.
[Keynes] No… it’s the animal spirits
You see it’s all about spending, hear the register cha-ching
Circular flow, the dough is everything
So if that flow is getting low, doesn’t matter the reason
We need more government spending, now it’s stimulus season
So forget about saving, get it straight out of your head
Like I said, in the long run—we’re all dead
Savings is destruction, that’s the paradox of thrift
Don’t keep money in your pocket, or that growth will never lift…
because…
Business is driven by the animal spirits
The bull and the bear, and there’s reason to fear its
Effects on capital investment, income and growth
That’s why the state should fill the gap with stimulus both…
The monetary and the fiscal, they’re equally correct
Public works, digging ditches, war has the same effect
Even a broken window helps the glass man have some wealth
The multiplier driving higher the economy’s health
And if the Central Bank’s interest rate policy tanks
A liquidity trap, that new money’s stuck in the banks!
Deficits could be the cure, you been looking for
Let the spending soar, now that you know the score
My General Theory’s made quite an impression
[a revolution] I transformed the econ profession
You know me, modesty, still I’m taking a bow
Say it loud, say it proud, we’re all Keynesians now
We’ve been goin’ back n forth for a century
[Keynes] I want to steer markets,
[Hayek] I want them set free
There’s a boom and bust cycle and good reason to fear it
[Keynes] I made my case, Freddie H
Listen up , Can you hear it?
Hayek sings:
I’ll begin in broad strokes, just like my friend Keynes
His theory conceals the mechanics of change,
That simple equation, too much aggregation
Ignores human action and motivation
And yet it continues as a justification
For bailouts and payoffs by pols with machinations
You provide them with cover to sell us a free lunch
Then all that we’re left with is debt, and a bunch
If you’re living high on that cheap credit hog
Don’t look for cure from the hair of the dog
Real savings come first if you want to invest
The market coordinates time with interest
Your focus on spending is pushing on thread
In the long run, my friend, it’s your theory that’s dead
So sorry there, buddy, if that sounds like invective
Prepared to get schooled in my Austrian perspective
We’ve been going back and forth for a century
[Keynes] I want to steer markets,
[Hayek] I want them set free
There’s a boom and bust cycle and good reason to fear it
[Hayek] Blame low interest rates.
[Keynes] No… it’s the animal spirits
The place you should study isn’t the bust
It’s the boom that should make you feel leery, that’s the thrust
Of my theory, the capital structure is key.
Malinvestments wreck the economy
The boom gets started with an expansion of credit
The Fed sets rates low, are you starting to get it?
That new money is confused for real loanable funds
But it’s just inflation that’s driving the ones
Who invest in new projects like housing construction
The boom plants the seeds for its future destruction
The savings aren’t real, consumption’s up too
And the grasping for resources reveals there’s too few
So the boom turns to bust as the interest rates rise
With the costs of production, price signals were lies
The boom was a binge that’s a matter of fact
Now its devalued capital that makes up the slack.
Whether it’s the late twenties or two thousand and five
Booming bad investments, seems like they’d thrive
You must save to invest, don’t use the printing press
Or a bust will surely follow, an economy depressed
Your so-called “stimulus” will make things even worse
It’s just more of the same, more incentives perversed
And that credit crunch ain’t a liquidity trap
Just a broke banking system, I’m done, that’s a wrap.
We’ve been goin’ back n forth for a century
[Keynes] I want to steer markets,
[Hayek] I want them set free
There’s a boom and bust cycle and good reason to fear it
[Hayek] Blame low interest rates.
[Keynes] No it’s the animal spirits

“The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.”
John Maynard Keynes
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money

“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.”
F A Hayek
The Fatal Conceit


My Mind is Clean


The Five Most Underrated Presidents

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 24 2010, 02:09 PM

I posted this video on my Facebook account last night, and it got me to thinking about how we truly need a guy like Warren G Harding right now. Yeah, I know he had some personal failings, but that'd keep the media busy while he brought the federal spending juggernaut to a crawl. As much as I couldn't stand Bill Clinton, I'd even take his triangulating, philandering butt over what we currently have.

Americans have very little sense of history even if they let a few historians occupying the commanding heights tell them what to think about a president. Unless he's know for doing something grand and controversial, he's seen as a failure. Watch Robert Wuhl's "Assume the Position" and you'll see what I mean. Although he's a comedian (I'm told), his reduction of US presidents to a series of one liners isn't far from what you get in a US History class in high school or college.

Okay, so watch the video on Harding and the Depression of 1920. It's long, but very entertaining. Then tell me who your underrated presidents are. Here are mine...

5. James K. Polk



I'm not as bothered by the land grab from Mexico as some of my libertarian friends. The Mexican government was as harsh and despotic as any in Europe, so there's no sympathy there. If anything, our expansion hurt us in that it strengthened the federal government. But besides that, Polk moved us away from economic protectionism and took federal money out of the hands of private banks. If Obama did that today...well, one can fantasize, right?

4. Ulysses S. Grant



He should be more highly regarded by liberals for his positive civil rights record, but he's not. Besides that, I admire him for his response to the Panic of 1873. The history books say he didn't act soon enough but then go on to explain that it ran its course without government help. Yeah, see how that works?

3. Grover Cleveland



The last of the small government Democrats. He reduced the federal work force and scrapped the spoils system for hiring. Dude vetoed a bill to give $10,000 worth of seed to Texas farmers after a drought. Gotta love a president who won't coddle farmers.

2. Calvin Coolidge



Silent Cal is my favorite 20th century president next to Ronald Reagan. He was by no means perfect in that as governor Massachusetts, he was too much of an economic interventionist for my taste. What's really cool is that he had the restraint to leave all that behind once he became president. I love it when a politician respects limits.

1. Warren G Harding



I say he's the most underrated because he's been so reviled by progressive historians. Heck, just watch the video. Thomas Woods does a much better job explaining it than I could.

My Mind is Clean


Turds in the Punchbowl Deregulation

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 21 2010, 02:24 PM

Obama's moving on now that health care reform is all but dead. Today, he said "Never again will the American taxpayer be held hostage by a bank that is too big to fail" as he announced new banking restrictions. And it should come as no surprise that he's moving on to this issue because it will resonate with the same voters who he's been losing on the health care issue. Whine as we might, conservatives are going to get our butts handed to us on this unless we get the heart of the matter and get to it quickly.

The truth is that too many banks have sold out to what I call "Two Cs Capitalism" --credit capitalism and crony capitalism. They've played within absurdly unrealistic limits while pretending that because it was all perfectly legal, there would be no negative consequences. The Federal Reserve on one hand has created an illusion of expertise that has made credit capitalism, where banks and investors feel perfectly confident to ride the wave of inflation, flourish while on the other hand, elected officials in Washington encouraged banks to take incredible risks by putting the American taxpayer on the hook for it all.

If there's something wrong with that analysis, I'd like to hear it.

Okay, so what do Republicans do about it?



First, let me say that I could care less if the GOP succeeds as a party. But with what appears to be a shift from business as usual party insiders to Tea Party activists, I think there's hope that better, more effective solutions and messages might come out of the GOP this year. So I'm optimistic that the GOP can turn Obama's populist ranting about the banks on its ear. And here's how they should do it.

Forget the bonuses and the taxes on banks that received TARP money. I know that there were banks that had no choice. I know that it's unconstitutional to do what Obama is proposing. But as an industry, banking brought this on itself. Innocent people will suffer as they always do when the constitution is violated in the name of helping "the people".

What GOP candidates and surrogates need to do is go Obama one further in populist rhetoric by highlighting the bi-partisan creation of a moral hazard in banking. They need to go all the way back to the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 when Congress authorized a savings and loan deposit insurance limit increase from $40,000 to $100,000. It needs to be shouted from the roof tops that the Democrats added this increase to a supposed deregulation bill WITHOUT DEBATE. It was an inexplicable backroom deal. It was a turd in the punchbowl. When President Reagan rightly moved to deregulate the S&Ls several years later, the turd floats to the top and costs the American taxpayer over $160 billion.

Flash forward to 1999, President Clinton and a GOP led Congress wisely repeal the New Deal era Glass-Steagall Banking Act, but include a very complicated turd in the punchbowl called "credit default swaps". Along with existing federal deposit insurance, credit default swaps create a nearly risk free atmosphere.

And that's where crony capitalism comes in. The banks themselves weren't too big to fail, the leaders of the industry were too big to fail because they were friends with elected leaders.

The GOP has to pull a Domino's Pizza (they're admitting that their pizza sucks) and expose their own ties to big banks and how those ties led to the bail outs. Then they need to point out the turds in the punchbowl so people can see what they've been drinking.

Then, they need to announce plans to either drastically reduce or eliminate all deposit insurance except for regular checking and savings accounts while denouncing TARP. I know it's a death sentence for a candidate who supported TARP to admit they made a mistake, so some of them need to hit the road. Others had better hope their constituents have other reasons to vote for them. New candidates running against incumbent Democrats HAVE to steal this issue away from Obama. And it has to be a party-wide theme. The GOP has to become the party of untainted capitalism.

No more turds in the punchbowl. Stop letting the progressives set booby traps that blow up in our faces every time we try to take off their economic handcuffs.

Expose the tricks, and you'll win.

My Mind is Clean


Stop Helping Haiti?

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 18 2010, 05:02 PM

From WND:

QUOTE
The earthquake is not a sign that people should begin helping Haiti. It is entirely the opposite. It is a powerful warning that people must stop trying to help Haiti. Instead, they must leave the Haitians alone to help themselves, which, of course, it is possible they may not be willing to do after decades of dependence on external support. Recall that the Haitian population went from 5 million in 1982 to 6.8 million in 2000 to 10 million in 2009, so if you think this tragedy was terrible, just wait until the inevitable next one strikes. Unsustainable societies always collapse; they cannot survive indefinitely. International aid does nothing more than prolong the period of life support and ensures that the ultimate collapse will be more catastrophic.


I think most of the Blogfather's critics are missing the point. It's not about refusing any form of help to the Haitians, it's about ending the cycle of dependency on foreign cash. Medical aid, food and rescue efforts are noble and appropriate. Cash donations past the point where you stop funding those efforts does more harm than good. It's the same old story all over the developing world. When you give cash, it props up corrupt regimes and allows them to continue where otherwise they would collapse.

I know the argument against letting that happen very well, and it appeals to the neoconservative Cold War mindset where stability trumps all. But it's a mindset that needs to be challenged among conservatives first. If we don't ourselves recognize the harm we do with financial aid, there's no way we're going to convince moderates or, "pragmatists", that this way isn't working well at all. We'll never convince the left that foreign aid is a bad idea.

In closing, I do want to make a few points about the Danny Glover/Pat Robertson tag team stupidity championship. First, if we have to be saddled with one or the other to represent the extreme fringes of "our side", I'd take Robertson any day. Science fans everywhere must be locked in a perpetual cringe at Glover's remarks. And they shouldn't try to downplay it either because this is where bad science leads--just like we've known for a long time where bad theology leads. Second: It's a given that Robertson's remarks were ill timed, insensitive and well within the realm of superstition, let's not forget that there are many in Haiti who believe in the legend of Bois Caïman. The site of the legendary ceremony has such strong patriotic significance, evangelical Christian pastors were arrested in 1998 for trying to preach a revival there. So, yes, Robertson is a dummy for blaming the earthquake on this pact with Satan, but are not the Haitians who proudly perpetuate this legend even dumber? Would you like to live in a country where such a story and place are highly regarded? I think the poverty in that country, if it isn't actually the result of Satanic hegemony, is the result of the kind of ignorance bred from superstition. It's easy for corrupt leadership to exploit a people like that.



I'd like to see the exploitation and superstition ended. Money isn't going to solve the first when money hasn't done any good so far, and calling Pat Robertson an idiot isn't going to end the last when the people are encouraged to be as superstitious as he is.

My Mind is Clean


God, Guns, Guts and Pick-up Trucks

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 12 2010, 08:14 PM

Ace has another example of why the media doesn't understand its own country...



My favorite line: "You got a problem with God?"

Before she cut him off with her breathless question about how one can include God in the same sentence as guns, she basically asserted that no one needs an assault weapon for home defense. I'm pretty sure the truck dealer was going to make this point, he seemed like a sharp guy for a Missourian, but I have to make it just to get it out of my head...

WHY WOULDN'T YOU WANT AN ASSAULT WEAPON FOR HOME DEFENSE?

Listen, stupid lady, if you're going to defend yourself with a weapon, why not make it the best possible weapon so you can, you know, out gun whoever is attacking you? I can think of may reasons not to own an AK-47. For me it would be affordability. I can't see plunking down $500 or much more seeing as how I'm in the People's Republic of California. Some might also prefer a different kind of assault weapon like a shotgun. Others might not like the idea of having a commie weapon in their house.

All those are logical reasons. But her "I just don't see why you need an AK-47 for home defense" is yet another piece of evidence that thinking waved bye-bye to the journalism profession years ago.

My Mind is Clean


Avatar Advocacy

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 5 2010, 08:03 PM

I knew it was going to happen. Conservatives are rooting against Avatar and liberals are rooting for it. To do what? Lose a ton of money? Make a ton of money? As a conservative who has no problem with this movie making money or with anyone else seeing it, I can't bring myself to go watch it for the same reason I didn't buy the first available cell phone or flat screen TV (a buddy of mine just gave us one, and it's awesome!). I like to wait until my first crack at new technology is solid and what would be considered top of the line back when it was prohibitively expensive. In other words, I'm not an early adopter. I'll go see the next movie they make with the tech developed while making Avatar. Well, that is unless its story also lacks appeal.



Having said that, the celebration over Avatar's profitability is annoying because it petty and uninformed. First of all, it's silly to talk about a movie making a billion dollars as if that's some kid of amazing feat when inflation has skyrocketed, and in this particular movie's case, ticket prices are almost double the normal price because most people want to see it on an expensive 3-D IMAX screen. Second, and this point is illustrated by the following quote from Patrick Goldstein...

QUOTE
For years, pundits and bloggers on the right have ceaselessly attacked liberal Hollywood for being out of touch with rank and file moviegoers, complaining that executives and filmmakers continue to make films that have precious little resonance with Middle America. They have reacted with scorn to such high-profile liberal political advocacy films as "Syriana," "Milk," "W.," " Religulous," "Lions for Lambs," "Brokeback Mountain," "In the Valley of Elah," "Rendition" and "Good Night, and Good Luck," saying that the movies' poor performances at the box office were a clear sign of how thoroughly uninterested real people were in the pet causes of showbiz progressives.

Of course, "Avatar" totally turns this theory on its head.


One mega budget, mass marketed success does not a trend make. The fact that a Hollywood leftist was able to get graphics-hungry fans to hold their nose through a lame story does not prove that the story isn't lame. Even more retarded is the contention that Avatar's success proves that the reason no one wanted to see the long list of left-wing movies in Goldstein's own list isn't because American's are sick of left-wing movies. So, what, every movie in that list flopped because of bad timing? Insufficient marketing? I guess if they had a Happy Meal cross-promotion with McDonald's and Brokeback Mountain, it would have made a billion dollars. At least you wouldn't have to worry about which kid gets the boy and girl toys.

Goldstein and his ilk are doing far more to make Avatar an occasion for partisan cheer leading than any conservative. But as usual, the liberal habit of psychological projection totally turns my theory on its head.

My Mind is Clean


Brit Hume's Buddhist Problem

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 4 2010, 09:02 PM

Here's what Brit said on Fox News Sunday...



"He is said to be a Buddhist. I don't think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is offered by the Christian faith. Tiger, turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world.

A Buddhist blogger named Barbara O'Brien (!) responded with this...

"I don't like to point out other's faults, but given the record, I would think Christians would show a little more humility about offering advice to the sexually wayward."

Given the record of Christians being sexually wayward? Yeah, because Brit's point was that Tiger would not have cheated on his wife and seven other skanks if he were pretending to be a Christian instead of pretending to be a Buddhist. Do American Buddhists even consider what Tiger did to be a sin? Do they even have a concept of sin? You see, a person can't be redeemed or forgiven if their belief system doesn't include the concept of sin. That's why Kyle Lovett's following comment makes no sense...

"Could Hume get away with saying something like this about Jewish people or black people or the Muslim Faith?"

Ignoring the part about black people (really, Kyle?), of course Hume wouldn't say the same thing about those religions because they do believe in the concept of sin. Hume didn't advise Tiger to turn to Judaism or Islam because Hume is a Christian, and a fairly newly minted one at that. He's only gotten serious about his faith recently. and one can only hope he doesn't lose the kind of bold faith he has right now. I think it's terrific.

So many Americans like to think themselves tolerant to the point where they hold all religions in equal esteem. They are so focused on the issue of tolerance that they can't even see the logic behind picking a faith. When you pick one over the others, no amount of lip service to them makes up for the fact that when you do choose to follow one faith exclusively, you are by definition disparaging the others.

As a Christian, I'm not okay with other people choosing not to follow my faith. I'm not going to congratulate them on finding just any path to follow. But that's okay. I'm not going to punch anyone in the face on account of it, and I'd expect that same level of tolerance for myself. My Muslim and Jewish friends should be worried about me and want me to convert to their faiths. And as long as they are willing to discuss it in a civilized manor, I'm happy to let them try to convert me.

If Buddhists have a problem with Brit Hume's remarks, let them explain it in more profound ways than pointing out that Christians can be hypocrites or that he's not treating Buddhism like every other religion.

You'd think as Buddhists they could come up with something a bit more pithy. Something that could be wrapped inside a fortune cookie.

My Mind is Clean


Dating Guidelines for Women...From a Man

Posted by Mr. Naron, Jan 2 2010, 07:59 PM

This ought to be helpful for those of you ladies who are still unattached and can't figure out why. From The Blogfather...



1. If you find a man attractive, smile at him and meet his eyes. If he returns the smile, he is attracted and will approach you if he is interested. Don't be bothered if he smiles but does not approach, this usually signifies that he is either polite but uninterested or is not interested even though he finds you attractive. This lack of interest may be for a very good reason, such as marriage and children, so just let it go and find someone else at whom you can smile.

2. Don't play stupid games. Men are goal-oriented and while some may enjoy the chase, that's really not the point. The reason men ditch women after scoring them isn't because the chase was too short but because they've achieved their objective and are now making the logical next step of pursuing a new one. Prolonging the chase isn't likely to alter the ultimate result once the objective is attained, however long that takes.

3. Learn to distinguish between a man who genuinely seeks a companion and a man who simply wants to have a good time. If you are seeking the former sort, then waste absolutely no time on the latter type.

4. Men don't love drama. We don't watch it, we don't read it, we don't play it, and we certainly don't want to live it. The less you can create, the better. If you crave excitement, go jump out of an airplane or find a way to test your skills against others. It works fine for us.

5. Bad boys play hard and they leave their mark. You might not think your emotional scars show, but they do and they are seldom flattering. Also, it's difficult to "make the most of your youth" with the bad boys for five or ten years and then be happy settling for a nice, respectable beta provider.

6. Above all, don't try to be a mother. He survived without you before so he knows he can survive just fine without you now. There are plenty of girls on the girl tree and moreover, there is nothing less sexually attractive to the psychosexually normal adult male than a woman playing Mommy. Men find it aggravating, irritating, and emasculating to have a woman attempting to order them about like a child. And note that silent toleration does not indicate acceptance.

7. If the man isn't 30 pounds overweight, sex is always a more important priority than food. This will be true until McDonalds opens a drive-through brothel or the first Victoria's Secret line of sexbots becomes available.

8. Never, ever, talk about anyone with whom you work. Don't even talk about anyone he hasn't met unless it's a genuinely funny story and you are one of the rare women who are able to tell a story without stopping in the middle and restarting, forgetting the punchline, or otherwise blowing it. To put it in perspective, men care less about your faceless coworkers, family, and friends than you do about the Tuck Rule or the Bling Pro perk. And yes, I know you don't know what they are... how much do you care about them? Exactly....

My Mind is Clean


Entries in December 2009

Best of the Decade...

Posted by Mr. Naron, Dec 30 2009, 03:22 PM

Let's do them all right here, starting with...

Movies

5. The Blind Side
Like The Passion of the Christ and several other massively profitable films with uplifting messages that paint Christians in a positive light, this movie should be studied in film school. I didn't put The Passion in my top five only because I can't bear to watch it anymore.

4. Iron Man
Most superhero movies are like sugar highs--even The Dark Knight. But not this one. Robert Downey Jr. is the key, I'm sure.

3. The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe
Both movies in this franchise were excellent. We took the kids to see the first one at the El Capitan theater in Hollywood where they had snow falling and movie props in the lobby. And the movie had me tearing up in several places.

2. Joe Dirt
If you don't cry when Robbie (Kid Rock) tells Joe that Def Leppard sucks, then throws gravel in Joe's face as he peels out in his Trans Am...well, you just don't have a soul.

1. The Return of the King
This is for the whole trilogy, although the third one does rate as my favorite. It is by far the best movie trilogy ever made.

Albums

5. United Abominations-- Megadeth
Nobody does righteous indignation like Dave Mustaine, and as he's matured, his critique of government has become more precise and informed. The music rocks as always, but it's much tighter than in their latest.

4. Microscopic View of a Telescopic Realm-- Tourniquet
Their last great album and a return to form after two good, but not "metal" good albums. Extremely technical and deep in imagery.

3. How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb--U2
The new CD is great and will likely grow on me more and more each year, but I still rank this one above it because of its instant accessibility.

2. All That You Can't Leave Behind --U2
This one came out at the exact right time and struck the exact right tone.

1. Death Magnetic-- Metallica
Best Metallica record since the black album, and in my opinion, better.


Televsion

5. Chuck
Perfect combination of action, humor, nostalgia and that one chick is hot. You know its a good show if it's constantly on the chopping block like Firefly, which would be an easy #6 on this list.

4. The Office
While I love 30 Rock and now Community, nothing beats The Office for great characters. Nothing they do surprises me anymore, but I cringe nonetheless.

3. Battlestar Galactica
The first two or three seasons got it on the list. The jerk around there at the end should go down in history as a way to not do TV. Lost, I'm looking at you.

2. Friday Night Lights
Football. Come on. Who cares if it's a soap opera? It has football.

1. 24
Jack Bauer is a pimp.

News Stories

5. First Black President
*Yawn* At least we got it out of the way.

4. Human genome mapped
This is going to be a huge thing forever. It'll get bigger in the rear view mirror as other stories get smaller.

3. 2000 Election
Liberals like to think that they hate GWB because of the Iraq War, but they hated him already because they think he "stole" the 2000 election from Al Gore. It's hard to imagine this decade without Bush Derangement Syndrome. It'd be like the 1970s without Watergate.

2. China
Like the genome thing, this story will only get bigger. China has a middle class about the size of the United States and a work force about twice that size still working in agriculture. Their growth potential dwarfs ours, and all they have to do is allow some free market activity. And as they become more like us, we become more like them.

1. The War on a Method Called Terrorism
I think the attack of September 11 actually gave us a false sense of security as have every failed attempt since then. With the exception of our servicemen and women and their families, very few of us have been asked to sacrifice. Our hope rests with those returning servicemen and women. As a group, they're about the only ones with the perspective to make us safe and secure. But there's also a frightening danger in that hope. The wrong war hero can be our worst nightmare.

My Mind is Clean


Book Review: One Second After

Posted by Mr. Naron, Dec 29 2009, 06:51 PM

I've been in my "curl up with bad fiction" mode since Christmas. I hope you've all had a good one. Mine has been great. The kids got what they wanted--and much more--and I found my new Christmas dinner menu: Beef tenderloin with a red wine and mustard sauce, roasted vegetables and bacon wrapped green beans. Let me tell you, I've never eaten anything as good in my life. The only turd in the punch bowl was the fact that Amy bought me a new practice amp and now my guitar doesn't work.

Anyway, back to the bad fiction. I started with one of the sequels to Eric Flint's 1632, 1634: The Galileo Affair. What a piece of crap that was. I couldn't even finish it. You would think that by half way through a 700 page novel, I could bring myself to care what happens to at least one character or want to find out how at least one plot line gets resolved. Nope. Not even a little bit. Flint must have let his "co-writer", Andrew Dennis, have complete control of the project because there's not a shred of the tight readability in 1634 that made 1632 such goofy fun. Both authors deserve atomic wedgies for it.

And speaking of atomic, my next selection, William Forstchen's EMP nightmare scenario, One Second After was impossible to put down. Scared the living crap out of me. It takes place in a small college town in North Carolina where the citizens band together to survive after the power goes out and the vast majority of electronic equipment is fried. Talk about a gut-wrenching page turner. Anyone with kids, dogs and grandmas will see their worst fears spilled out in black and white. Forstchen's writing is relentless.



I don't really want to go into what I think we should all do about the EMP threat. I can see myself becoming obsessed over it, and perhaps I should be. But I have to remind myself that it's just a book. There's lots of things my family and I should be prepared for, and where we live, the most likely scenario would be a nasty earthquake. So, I'll just continue ignoring that instead.

biggrin.gif

I'd love to hear what you all got. Help get my mind off that danged book. Maybe keep me from having nightmares again tonight.

My Mind is Clean


Has the War on Christmas Become a Holiday Itself?

Posted by Mr. Naron, Dec 23 2009, 01:05 PM

A-Man-Duh thinks it has...

QUOTE
Hey, we wouldn’t be a proper evil secular liberal blog if we didn’t observe the War on Christmas. Of course, the way that liberals actually observe it is to point out that it’s strictly a conservative holiday, invented and observed only by conservatives who want to believe they are martyrs at the hands of invisible secularists who run into their houses, snatching presents from their children’s hands. That this has never happened has no bearing on the outrage---abuses that happen only in the mind of conservatives are, if anything, even better evidence that they are beset by liberal demons.


This is the Christmas equivalent of "it's just a movie". It's a liberal tactic that plays upon conservatives' sense of proportion, giving liberals cover to continue chipping away at our culture and institutions. Because no liberal has actually snatched a present from a child's hand, the whole "war on Christmas" is nothing but the fevered dream of the pathetic war minded conservative. So, liberals attack Christmas by complaining about traditional greetings, banning carols and nativity scenes in places where they've been welcome since forever, and even forbidding certain colors from being used in decorations because of their affiliation with the birth of Jesus, and we're the ones who made up the controversy.



I assure you, our outrage is quite proportional and appropriate since none of us are accusing anyone of snatching a gift from a child.

Now, not at all ironic is how A-man-duh completely loses her holiday fudge over the word "neuter" in reference to conservative Catholic Bill Donohue's contention that the "neutering of Christmas extends to the banishment of Nativity Scenes from the public square, the expulsion of Baby Jesus from creches not otherwise forbidden, the banning of red and green at school functions, the censoring of “Silent Night” at municipal concerts, etc."...

QUOTE
Neutering, huh? The word we use when we talk about cutting off an animal’s testicles? My oh my, Donohue certainly has a different experience of Christmas than the one I thought you were supposed to have! I always thought it was a holiday about peace and love and presents, but apparently what’s laying in that manger is not an infant god, but in fact a representation of wingnut genitals set up for us to worship. And if we don’t worship them, then said wingnuts are neutered.


This is why internet nerds bust out dictionaries. Because other internet nerds are such sloppy thinkers that they base an entire post on the misunderstanding of a word's usage. But that's a minor thing, here. What's really amazing is how out of proportion A-man-duh's outrage gets over this word...

QUOTE
In a way, the conflation of the baby Jesus with wingnut gonads makes sense. They’ve been practicing this equivalency for a long time: “babies=fetuses=Sperm Magic”, and so there comes a time when an infant starts to blur with your own <censored> worship. And since the Bible makes a big deal out of how Jesus was formed with god’s own mighty sperm, then the leap is pretty easy to make. God sperm, man sperm---either way, the point is that sperm is magic, and that gods and men can make it proves they’re objects of power and worship. And if we don’t have nativity scenes where everyone stands around worshiping the baby Jesus/wingnut phallic symbol, then we’ve essentially emasculated them. Might as well cut their balls off. Or, as Bill Donohue likes to put it, neuter them.


I've never encountered this kind of single-minded focus on the ideology of a left-wing subculture outside the California Board of Education. Maybe if we can get A-man-duh on the board, we could get "sperm magic" ranked for high emphasis on the state test.



My Mind is Clean


104 Pages V   1 2 3 > »