RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Judge Overseeing General Flynn Sentencing Dismissed Similar Case in 20 - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Judge Overseeing General Flynn Sentencing Dismissed Similar Case in 20 Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Junto 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 886
  • Joined: 19-January 06

Posted 13 December 2018 - 09:28 AM


Judge Overseeing General Flynn Sentencing Dismissed Similar Case in 2009 Due to Fraudulent 302 Documents and DOJ “Misconduct”


Gateway Pundit
by Jim Hoft
December 13, 2018

<Excerpt>

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, who is overseeing the sentencing in the case of the US government against General Michael Flynn, has seen government corruption before. In 2009 the judge dismissed the DOJ’s case against Alaska Republican Senator Ted Stevens due to government corruption.

In 2008 Republican Senator Ted Stevens, who was the longest serving Republican Senator in history, was found guilty on eight felony counts brought by the US government. A few days later, Senator Stevens lost his election in Alaska.

When the sentencing finally came down in 2009, the case was dismissed due to DOJ corruption. But it was ultimately too late for Senator Stevens who lost his re-election a few months earlier. It was just another DOJ set-up. And Obama and Democrats ended up with a super-majority in the US Senate with 60 seats.

This same judge Sullivan from the Stevens case was appointed to oversee General Michael Flynn’s sentencing for lying to the FBI. According to his judicial profile, on October 3, 1984, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President Ronald Reagan to serve as an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. He was later on November 25, 1991, appointed by President George H. W. Bush to serve as an Associate Judge of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Then on June 16, 1994, Judge Sullivan was appointed by President William J. Clinton to serve as United States District Judge for the District of Columbia.

Yesterday Judge Sullivan requested that the DOJ provide all FBI 302 forms related to the Flynn case –

New Court Order in the Flynn case (12/12/2018):

1) The parties are ordered to file ALL FBI 302 forms.

2) The Special Counsel is ordered to file its reply to Flynn's sentencing memo by 12/14/2018.

Very interesting. pic.twitter.com/QUovUQOUQp

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) December 12, 2018

The Judge also requested that the government provide a copy of the memo written by fired former FBI Head Andrew McCabe.

<snip>

Full Story

This post has been edited by Liz: 15 December 2018 - 10:07 AM
Reason for edit: To excerpt article and to correct link.

0

#2 User is offline   Junto 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 886
  • Joined: 19-January 06

Posted 13 December 2018 - 09:30 AM

I think the trap was set for Mueller, and now that they have offered a lenient sentence to Flynn, they activate the trap. This judge already has a history dealing with Mueller/Weissman and fraudulent 302s and he is going to discover it happened again. BOOM!
0

#3 User is offline   Junto 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 886
  • Joined: 19-January 06

Posted 13 December 2018 - 10:06 AM

So Rosenstein signed one of those FISA warrants that made it possible to spy on Flynn to begin with. Rosenstein writes a memo saying Comey should be fired, and when Trump fires Comey for all his misdeeds, Rosenstein appoints Mueller and McCabe and team frame Flynn for leverage?

The web seems very complicated, but if I am Flynn, I am wondering why every agent and executive agents involved with my case have been fired for misconduct directly relating to how they handled my case and others connected to me.
0

#4 User is offline   Severian 

  • Order of the Seekers for Truth & Penitence
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 13,522
  • Joined: 14-February 04

Posted 13 December 2018 - 10:47 AM

The whole thing with the FBI and their 302 forms is outrageous to start with. They don't record interrogations/interviews and transcribe them verbatim to enter into the records, no, an FBI agent "summarizes" what was said. Does no one see the massive danger for abuse in this approach?
0

#5 User is offline   Junto 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 886
  • Joined: 19-January 06

Posted 13 December 2018 - 11:13 AM

View PostSeverian, on 13 December 2018 - 10:47 AM, said:

The whole thing with the FBI and their 302 forms is outrageous to start with. They don't record interrogations/interviews and transcribe them verbatim to enter into the records, no, an FBI agent "summarizes" what was said. Does no one see the massive danger for abuse in this approach?

In Flynn's case, the 302s were written 7 months after the fact! After Comey was fired and after McCabe is holding open meetings in the office saying they needed to stop Trump. After Strzok and Page were found out. Insanity.
0

#6 User is offline   Dean Adam Smithee 

  • School of the Cold Hard Facts
  • View gallery
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 20,147
  • Joined: 11-December 04

Posted 13 December 2018 - 11:21 AM

View PostJunto, on 13 December 2018 - 09:28 AM, said:



General Flynn was criminally attacked by the FBI, DOJ and corrupt Mueller team and then charged with phony crimes. The sequence of events is astounding. The original 302 on General Flynn stated that he did not lie but then later it was changed

So the apparent sequence of events was: 1) Flynn interview, 2) preparation of a memorandum noting conclusion that Flynn did not lie, 3) Comey fired, 4) Mueller appointed, 5) Rosenstein issues secret new Mueller orders, 6) Strzok fired, 7) new FBI memo claiming Flynn lied.


— S


Rep. Mark Meadows was onto this back in June. It seemed to be potentially 'explosive' and I was wondering if it fell off the table, or what.


GOP lawmaker says evidence might have been tampered with in Flynn case

6/21/2018


Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) suggested Thursday in an interview wth Hill.TV's "Rising" that evidence may have been tampered with in the case against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Meadows, the leader of the conservative House Freedom Caucus and a close ally of President Trump's, said he and other lawmakers are finding evidence of possible tampering, an allegation he previously made at a House hearing where Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified.

"Justice should be meted out evenly, and yet we’re finding that evidence could have been tampered with," Meadows said.

Meadows suggested one focus is whether FBI interview reports — known as 302 reports — about Flynn were altered to improve the chances he'd be prosecuted.

"I brought this up with the inspector general the other day. Some of those key witness will be asked to appear before House Oversight," he added.

The question about the FBI interview reports, he said, was "were they changed to change the outcome of prosecution decisions. I think they might have."...

Full story on TheHill.com
0

#7 User is online   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 26,554
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 13 December 2018 - 11:25 AM

This is the only way democrats can win. By deception and trickery. If the truth and nothing but the truth were disclosed, democrats would go politically bankrupt.
0

#8 User is offline   Dean Adam Smithee 

  • School of the Cold Hard Facts
  • View gallery
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 20,147
  • Joined: 11-December 04

Posted 13 December 2018 - 02:48 PM

View PostSeverian, on 13 December 2018 - 10:47 AM, said:

The whole thing with the FBI and their 302 forms is outrageous to start with. They don't record interrogations/interviews and transcribe them verbatim to enter into the records, no, an FBI agent "summarizes" what was said. Does no one see the massive danger for abuse in this approach?


There's a place for the FD-302s... but only as an informal off-the-record "summary", so that supervisors and/or agents following up later have a general understanding of what was said without having to listen to hours and hours and hours of tapes. A proper interview should have both tapes AND a written summary; I know if I ever get "interviewed" by the FBI, There's going to me at least MY OWN voice recorder going. It would be a pre-condition: No recorder, no interview.

Beyond that, they're little more than 'Hearsay' for the reasons you stated. Problem is, the interviewee has no opportunity to verify that what the agent wrote down accurately reflects the conversation; it's completely different than a "statement" that is reviewed and signed by the interviewee. For this reason alone the FD-302s should NEVER be used as a prosecutorial tool such as to charge someone with "perjury" or whatever.
0

#9 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 55,124
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 13 December 2018 - 03:39 PM

View Postzurg, on 13 December 2018 - 11:25 AM, said:

This is the only way democrats can win. By deception and trickery. If the truth and nothing but the truth were disclosed, democrats would go politically bankrupt.


Which would be fitting, considering the fact that they're already morally and ethically bankrupt.

B)
0

#10 User is online   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 26,310
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 13 December 2018 - 09:35 PM

View PostSeverian, on 13 December 2018 - 10:47 AM, said:

The whole thing with the FBI and their 302 forms is outrageous to start with. They don't record interrogations/interviews and transcribe them verbatim to enter into the records, no, an FBI agent "summarizes" what was said. Does no one see the massive danger for abuse in this approach?


The ironic thing here is EVERY LEO agency in America other than them video's every interview. IF someone can lose their damn freedom over the exchange then you better have it catalogued so it can be PROVEN. On top of that a statement is written and the person being interviewed SIGNS that statement. There is no "recollection", it either happened and it's provable or it didn't happen.
Remember this, if there is a claim of a Constitutional violation by LEOs this is the "agency" that investigates those claims. Yet they are being proven to be the most corrupt agency out there violating the rights of anyone they disagree with. Using that nonsense to even justify wire tap warrant is an obvious violation of peoples 4th Amendment rights, yet here we are throwing people in prison for it. It's time a judge stood up and stopped this nonsense. Notice the dates of the 302 that they used on Flynn, it's MONTHS after the interview and right after Lurch was told that there are obvious biases in the actions of various agents that were operating against Trump. The 302's that should have been used against Flynn should have been dated in Jan 2017 NOT August or September.

0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users