RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Twas The Night Before Mueller - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Twas The Night Before Mueller Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,483
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 18 April 2019 - 12:50 AM

Quote

Twas The Night Before Mueller

Townhall.com
Chris Stigall
Apr 17, 2019 10:15 PM

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.

excerpt:


ĎTwas the night before Mueller, when all through the news

Every anchor was speculating, no cred left to lose

The scripts were all typed by producers with care

In hopes that team Mueller would confirm a Red Scare

The Democrats confident dirt had been found by the Feds

While visions of impeachment danced in their heads

And Hillary in her pantsuit, and a girl in Billís lap

The Clintons were hopeful theyíd still beat the rap

On cable news they were full of such speculative chatter

Proven liars and hucksters like Maddow and Rather

Away to the remote, needed to get away fast

Mueller graphics and countdown clocks, of my straws thatís the last

The panels of analysts and pundits did grow

Giving the appearance of substance on a news night thatís slow

When, what to my glassed-over eyes should appear

But Jim Acosta suggesting Trump had something fear

With a snide delivery and a bias thatís sick

CNN should spare us from watching this...guy

More rapid than eagles the speculation it came

Not a shred of evidence, they talked just the same

Now Cumo! Now Matthews! Now OíDonnell and Tapper!

On Lemon! On Cooper! On Hayes and on Blitzer!

From the top of the hour! To the top of the next!

Prognosticate, exaggerate of crimes you suggest!

<SNIP>

LINK

B)
0

#2 User is offline   NH Populist 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,307
  • Joined: 30-April 18

Posted 18 April 2019 - 05:25 AM

The Left's goal now is to discredit the messenger. Barr is Trump's hand picked A.G., that should work for starters...
0

#3 User is offline   Severian 

  • Order of the Seekers for Truth & Penitence
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 13,966
  • Joined: 14-February 04

Posted 18 April 2019 - 10:18 AM

View PostNH Populist, on 18 April 2019 - 05:25 AM, said:

The Left's goal now is to discredit the messenger. Barr is Trump's hand picked A.G., that should work for starters...

Clever take on Night Before Xmas. But, the Dems are spinning hard, harder than I think they would be if it was just trying to continue to demonize Trump. Granted they are all in on doing any and every thing they can to get him removed, but there's a touch of hysteria in them lately. Almost as if they are desperately trying to deflect and cast aspersions on the DOJ before the IG report comes out.

Declassify the FISA crap, and unleash the kraken, it's well past time for some blowback.
0

#4 User is offline   Bookdoc 

  • Daddy's little girl
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,101
  • Joined: 07-September 05

Posted 18 April 2019 - 10:29 AM

I was figuring that Trump would release the FISA stuff but he nay be waiting for the IGs report.
0

#5 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 35,578
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 18 April 2019 - 11:46 AM

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/57340935_2375805706029185_6743873587079282688_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=acf9f5bc6659b925aacef85bb9094c98&oe=5D2A5F4D
0

#6 User is online   AntonToo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 15,328
  • Joined: 28-September 04

Posted 18 April 2019 - 12:08 PM

View PostMTP Reggie, on 18 April 2019 - 11:46 AM, said:

https://scontent-dfw5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/57340935_2375805706029185_6743873587079282688_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&_nc_ht=scontent-dfw5-1.xx&oh=acf9f5bc6659b925aacef85bb9094c98&oe=5D2A5F4D


Wow, you think that's bad?

How about Trump hiring an AG who auditioned by assuring him that he could not have possibly commited an Obstruction?? And then that same appointee taking it upon himself to determine that the Obstruction was not commited?


Nobody knows what Clinton and Lynch discussed on tarmac, but we know EXACTLY what Barr promissed Trump and what Trump expected from Barr.

This post has been edited by AntonToo: 18 April 2019 - 12:08 PM

0

#7 User is offline   stick 

  • The 'Little Genius' giving thanks
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 16,460
  • Joined: 24-November 03

Posted 18 April 2019 - 12:25 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 18 April 2019 - 12:08 PM, said:

Wow, you think that's bad?

How about Trump hiring an AG who auditioned by assuring him that he could not have possibly commited an Obstruction?? And then that same appointee taking it upon himself to determine that the Obstruction was not commited?


Nobody knows what Clinton and Lynch discussed on tarmac, but we know EXACTLY what Barr promissed Trump and what Trump expected from Barr.


FYI - Mueller says that there was no actionable obstruction. Barr is just repeating what Mueller's report said.

No, we don't know what Clinton and Lynch discussed and that is a problem, but we DO know what followed that "conversation". But you wouldn't call THAT obstruction, now would you? You wouldn't support THAT meeting being investigated, would you?
0

#8 User is online   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 14,934
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 18 April 2019 - 05:57 PM

"We" is not the same in English as it is in Newspeak or even Russian, for that matter.
0

#9 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,124
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 18 April 2019 - 06:05 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 18 April 2019 - 12:08 PM, said:

Wow, you think that's bad?

How about Trump hiring an AG who auditioned by assuring him that he could not have possibly commited an Obstruction?? And then that same appointee taking it upon himself to determine that the Obstruction was not commited?


Nobody knows what Clinton and Lynch discussed on tarmac, but we know EXACTLY what Barr promissed Trump and what Trump expected from Barr.


:bs:

View Poststick, on 18 April 2019 - 12:25 PM, said:

FYI - Mueller says that there was no actionable obstruction. Barr is just repeating what Mueller's report said.

No, we don't know what Clinton and Lynch discussed and that is a problem, but we DO know what followed that "conversation". But you wouldn't call THAT obstruction, now would you? You wouldn't support THAT meeting being investigated, would you?


:exactly:
0

#10 User is offline   Squirrel 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 761
  • Joined: 24-September 18

Posted 18 April 2019 - 06:13 PM

And Antonís back,, I thought you have been saying just wait for the report? We have it or were you talking about a different one? If you have facts and information please share them now. Since you obviously did not with mueller
0

#11 User is online   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 14,934
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 18 April 2019 - 06:26 PM

View PostSquirrel, on 18 April 2019 - 06:13 PM, said:

And Antonís back,, I thought you have been saying just wait for the report? We have it or were you talking about a different one? If you have facts and information please share them now. Since you obviously did not with mueller


The Russian(s) just fed "facts and information" to Christopher Steele for checks from Fusion GPS that the FBI presented before a federal judge in order to obtain a FISA warrant four times over to surveil an American citizen whom "we" dismissed as someone who had no chance to be elected President of the United States of America. Come on. The odds were 100 million to zero.
0

#12 User is offline   Squirrel 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 761
  • Joined: 24-September 18

Posted 18 April 2019 - 08:08 PM

But according to anton he has the real facts that trump is hiding. Hell trump has now evidently employed mueller, does that sum it up anton? So what are the facts? Iím really curious and why canít you share them?
0

#13 User is online   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,567
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 18 April 2019 - 09:51 PM

Anton2 is wrong.... again.
0

#14 User is offline   Noclevermoniker 

  • Wire Dachsies Matter
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 16,851
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 18 April 2019 - 10:09 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 18 April 2019 - 12:08 PM, said:

Wow, you think that's bad?

How about Trump hiring an AG who auditioned by assuring him that he could not have possibly commited an Obstruction?? And then that same appointee taking it upon himself to determine that the Obstruction was not commited?


Nobody knows what Clinton and Lynch discussed on tarmac, but we know EXACTLY what Barr promissed Trump and what Trump expected from Barr.

Present your evidence. Put up or shut up.

This post has been edited by Noclevermoniker: 18 April 2019 - 10:10 PM

0

#15 User is offline   Rock N' Roll Right Winger 

  • Pissing off all of the right people
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 30,338
  • Joined: 14-October 03

Posted 18 April 2019 - 10:24 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 18 April 2019 - 12:08 PM, said:

Wow, you think that's bad?

How about Trump hiring an AG who auditioned by assuring him that he could not have possibly commited an Obstruction?? And then that same appointee taking it upon himself to determine that the Obstruction was not commited?


Nobody knows what Clinton and Lynch discussed on tarmac, but we know EXACTLY what Barr promissed Trump and what Trump expected from Barr.

Once again verifying what a complete tard that you are.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users