RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: The Democrats’ 2020 Vision: America Last - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

The Democrats’ 2020 Vision: America Last Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,573
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 10 January 2020 - 09:36 AM

Quote

The Democrats’ 2020 Vision: America Last

Townhall.com
Paul Curry
Jan 10, 2020 12:01 AM

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

excerpt:


Does President Trump’s policies of putting America’s interests first cause Trump Derangement Syndrome, or does Trump Derangement Syndrome cause liberals to abhor the concept of putting America’s interests first? It’s a causality dilemma to rival the ‘chicken and the egg.' Which came first, Trump Derangement Syndrome or the Democrats’ America last approach? Regardless of the order of origin, both have been on full display these past three years, and both present a problem for Democrats who hope to capture the White House in 2020.

This election year got off to a roaring start for Democrats suffering from TDS, and wholly disinterested in the better interests of the United States. An attack on the U.S. Embassy in Iraq was met with barely muted exuberance from all corners of the American left from Democrat politicians to their mouthpieces in the mainstream media. MSNBC and CNN practically celebrated “Trump’s Benghazi.” Senator Chris Murphy chimed in on Twitter, “Trump has rendered America impotent in the Middle East. No one fears us, no one listens to us.” Never mind that, unlike Benghazi, no American died in our embassy, there was no advance warning of the attack, Trump immediately called in the U.S. Marines, and Trump never attempted to blame the attack on his own domestic political rivals, the liberal mood was nothing short of celebratory. The only relevant question is, was it celebratory because it put foreign (terrorist) interests before that of the United States, or because it met their need to satisfy their TDS?

Following the attack on the American Embassy, and just a week after the murder of a U.S. contractor in Iraq, President Trump ordered the airstrike that took out the architect of both, Iranian General and terrorist mastermind Qasem Soleimani. This was clearly an action by the president to put American interests before that of a terrorist and a terrorist regime, and the Democrats mourned it. Nancy Pelosi called it an “unnecessary provocation,” Elizabeth Warren wondered aloud if he had done it to distract from the feckless impeachment, the media fell in line, and, once again, Chris Murphy chimed in on Twitter questioning the President’s response. Did any of the above mind so much when President Obama allowed Navy SEALs to kill Osama bin Laden? More importantly, were they objecting to President Trump putting American interests first by killing a terrorist, or were they succumbing to the effects of TDS?

Democrats, some of whom are seeking the White House, have a running history of forgetting to put America’s interests first, and viciously attacking anyone, usually President Trump, who does. The United States can benefit greatly from immigration. The U.S. also has a strong interest in stifling illegal immigration. Combating crime and drug trafficking, preventing terrorism, protecting our economy and social services are all reasons to curb illegal immigration and advancing those interests puts American interests first. And uniformly Democrats oppose putting these American interests first whereas President Trump chooses to. Is it the interests of America they do not wish to place first, or is it merely a symptom of their TDS?

The Democrats’ all-consuming impeachment obsession has, for three years, placed the interests of their party, and foreign governments, above that of the United States. First, they chased a Russian collusion narrative, all the while knowing it to be false. The goal of Russian interference in the 2016 election was to undermine faith in American democracy. By willfully promoting their conspiracy theories in a vane effort to undo an election, Democrats have profoundly furthered the interests of a foreign power over that of America.

<SNIP>


Link

Story caught my eye since I opined earlier about trying to figure out if leftists hate Trump or America more. Worth an entire read.
0

#2 User is offline   NH Populist 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 2,149
  • Joined: 30-April 18

Posted 10 January 2020 - 03:43 PM

The Left hates America, as Obama clearly demonstrated when he was in office, and now they hate Donald Trump for undoing their attempted undoing of America. They were so close, Jeb on the Right, Hillary on the Left, they couldn't lose. Except they did, even after pumping $1.2 billion into Hillary's campaign! I can only imagine what's coming from the Left in the next 10 months... :nuts:
0

#3 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 60,952
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 10 January 2020 - 04:09 PM

View PostNH Populist, on 10 January 2020 - 03:43 PM, said:

I can only imagine what's coming from the Left in the next 10 months... :nuts:


Let's hope they just continue along the same laughably idiotic trajectory they've been following for 4 years. Anybody who still perceives ANY level of "credibity" in the Democrats must be even crazier and stupider than they are.

<_<
0

#4 User is offline   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 16,488
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 10 January 2020 - 08:34 PM

Calling the attack on our Baghdad embassy "Trump's Benghazi" is an admission that 0bama allowed Libyan militiamen / terrorists to murder Americans to advance an agenda. To pass legislation in an attempt to restrict PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump's ability to respond to such provocations is an admission that Trump is disrupting that agenda.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users