RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: McCaskill’s Net Approval Drops To -11,a 19-Point Drop Since Early 2017 - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

McCaskill’s Net Approval Drops To -11,a 19-Point Drop Since Early 2017 Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Liz 

  • 1.4% Neanderthal
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 49,570
  • Joined: 28-February 03

  Posted 10 October 2018 - 01:27 PM

POLL: McCaskill’s Net Approval Drops To -11, a 19-Point Drop Since Early 2017

Morning Consult has been tracking senators' approval ratings since the beginning of 2017. Claire McCaskill's drop in net approval has been staggering.

Need To Know Network
By NTK Staff
10.10.2018 @2:00pm

Excerpt:

Sen. Claire McCaskill’s (D-MO) net approval rating among Missourians dropped seven points across the third quarter of 2018, according to Morning Consult‘s quarterly tracking of approval ratings for every U.S. senator.

McCaskill, whose net approval rating was +8 in both the first and second quarters of 2017, is now 11 points underwater. That’s a 19-percentage point drop in McCaskill’s net approval over 18 months – a staggering fall for a senator that was once more popular than unpopular among her constituents.

Here’s how her approval ratings have tracked, quarter to quarter:

  • Q1 2017: McCaskill 47-39 (+8)
  • Q2 2017: McCaskill 46-38 (+8)
  • Q3 2017: McCaskill 42-39 (+3)
  • Q4 2017: McCaskill 41-41 (+0)
  • Q1 2018: McCaskill 39-44 (-5)
  • Q2 2018: McCaskill 40-44 (-4)
  • Q3 2018: McCaskill 37-48 (-11)

*snip*

Full Story
0

#2 User is offline   Severian 

  • Order of the Seekers for Truth & Penitence
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 12,794
  • Joined: 14-February 04

Posted 10 October 2018 - 01:54 PM

I know someone who had to contact her for a brief interview related to something they were writing an article on. Afterwards they said, holy carp, that is hand's down one of the stupidest people I've ever had to talk to.
0

#3 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 33,765
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 10 October 2018 - 01:56 PM

https://www.conservativereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/big-blue-wave-sized.jpg
0

#4 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 2,733
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 10 October 2018 - 02:07 PM

Bye Felicia!
0

#5 User is offline   Liz 

  • 1.4% Neanderthal
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 49,570
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 10 October 2018 - 02:24 PM

With any luck at all, she'll be back in the private sector before long and not enriching herself at taxpayer expense.

This article is from last month but it's pertinent:

Claire McCaskill refuses to come clean about how her husband got his money

Washington Examiner
by Philip Wegmann
September 14, 2018 10:45 AM

Excerpt:

*snip*

McCaskill and her husband, businessman Joseph Shepard, have only gotten wealthier since she came to Congress. Roll Call ranked her as the 24th richest member of the legislature pegging her net worth at a cool $26.9 million. Some of that cash coincidentally comes from her husband’s investments in federally subsidized housing projects.

According to financial disclosure forms, McCaskill’s husband made between $1,608 and $16,731 on those investments in 2006, the year before she entered the Senate. Fast forward a decade and McCaskill’s husband is somehow making between $365,374 and $1,118,158 from those same federally backed investments. What role did McCaskill play in making those investments? Did McCaskill ever pass along any insider information to her husband? It looks like we will never know and that isn’t just shady. It’s hypocritical. McCaskill plays it both ways when it comes to money.

When McCaskill doesn’t want to be transparent, she makes it seem like she and her husband have separate bank accounts.

*snip*

When McCaskill needs the money though, like she did after she loaned herself $800,000 during her first campaign, she argued the family had joint resources.

*snip*

Link
0

#6 User is offline   Italian Biker 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 3,892
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 10 October 2018 - 03:34 PM

View PostSeverian, on 10 October 2018 - 01:54 PM, said:

I know someone who had to contact her for a brief interview related to something they were writing an article on. Afterwards they said, holy carp, that is hand's down one of the stupidest people I've ever had to talk to.

Just wait until this person has a reason to contact Ocasio-Cortez.
0

#7 User is offline   Bookdoc 

  • Daddy's little girl
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 4,737
  • Joined: 07-September 05

Posted 10 October 2018 - 05:15 PM

View PostItalian Biker, on 10 October 2018 - 03:34 PM, said:

Just wait until this person has a reason to contact Ocasio-Cortez.

:biglaugh:
0

#8 User is offline   Howsithangin 

  • I'm dethpicable
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 26,213
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 10 October 2018 - 07:38 PM

View PostSeverian, on 10 October 2018 - 01:54 PM, said:

I know someone who had to contact her for a brief interview related to something they were writing an article on. Afterwards they said, holy carp, that is hand's down one of the stupidest people I've ever had to talk to.


They need to interview Crazy Mazie
0

#9 User is offline   BootsieBets 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 127
  • Joined: 13-August 18

Posted 12 October 2018 - 11:47 AM

View PostItalian Biker, on 10 October 2018 - 03:34 PM, said:

Just wait until this person has a reason to contact Ocasio-Cortez.

Beat me to it! :biglaugh:
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users