RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Chelsea Manning May End Up Back In Jail After Refusing - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Chelsea Manning May End Up Back In Jail After Refusing To Honor Subpoena Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 05:36 AM

Quote

Chelsea Manning May End Up Back In Jail After Refusing To Honor Subpoena

The Daily Wire
By Emily Zanotti
March 7, 2019

excerpt:

Chelsea Manning may end up back in jail after the transgender activist refused to comply with a federal grand jury subpoena.

Law & Crime reports that it's unclear what issue the federal grand jury has been convened over, but it appears that prosecutors wanted Manning to testify regarding Julian Assange and Wikileaks. A U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia appeared to confirm that the government is pursuing an as-yet-unknown set of potential criminal charges against the Wikileaks founder, who is still holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

"The government slapped Manning with a subpoena to appear before a grand jury in the EDVA, Manning moved to quash the subpoena. A federal judge denied that attempted quashing on Tuesday," Law & Crime reported earlier this week.

Manning, of course, has a clear connection to Assange, having offered Wikileaks a trove of classified documents, transcripts, and videos stolen from military intelligence agencies in the Middle East during the Iraq War. Manning downloaded the classified material, ostensibly in protest of the military's ban on LGBT individuals serving openly, and passed the material to Assange, who posted it on Wikileaks.

Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison for espionage, but Manning's sentence was commuted by then-President Barack Obama.

Manning appears to have no intention of appearing or testifying in front of the federal grand jury, whether he is able to successfully quash the subpoena or not.


*SNIP*

LINK

Lock him up.


:coffeenpc:
0

#2 User is offline   spt 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 3,871
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 06:14 AM

View Postgrimreefer, on 08 March 2019 - 05:36 AM, said:

Lock him up.


:coffeenpc:

He should never have been freed in the first place. He should have received the punishment of a traitor.
0

#3 User is offline   NH Populist 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Joined: 30-April 18

Posted 08 March 2019 - 06:40 AM

View Postspt, on 08 March 2019 - 06:14 AM, said:

He should never have been freed in the first place. He should have received the punishment of a traitor.

Obama's choice for a 'wife' might have had something to do with his more than casual interest in Manning's predicament...Michael or Michelle, only the pres. knows for sure... 35 year sentence commuted?! More than a little weird considering the crime...

This post has been edited by NH Populist: 08 March 2019 - 06:55 AM

0

#4 User is offline   Ladybird 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 17,460
  • Joined: 26-October 07

Posted 08 March 2019 - 07:34 AM

View PostNH Populist, on 08 March 2019 - 06:40 AM, said:

Obama's choice for a 'wife' might have had something to do with his more than casual interest in Manning's predicament...Michael or Michelle, only the pres. knows for sure... 35 year sentence commuted?! More than a little weird considering the crime...


Sub-moronic.
0

#5 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,788
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 08 March 2019 - 08:10 AM

View Postspt, on 08 March 2019 - 06:14 AM, said:

He should never have been freed in the first place. He should have received the punishment of a traitor.


:yes:

"He" should have been executed.

View PostNH Populist, on 08 March 2019 - 06:40 AM, said:

Obama's choice for a 'wife' might have had something to do with his more than casual interest in Manning's predicament...Michael or Michelle, only the pres. knows for sure... 35 year sentence commuted?! More than a little weird considering the crime...


:thumbsup:

View PostLadybird, on 08 March 2019 - 07:34 AM, said:

Sub-moronic.


:rolleyes:
0

#6 User is offline   NH Populist 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,515
  • Joined: 30-April 18

Posted 08 March 2019 - 08:22 AM

View PostLadybird, on 08 March 2019 - 07:34 AM, said:

Sub-moronic.

You're losing your sense of humor Ms.B, but I would argue anyone voting for Progressives is beyond sub-moronic.
0

#7 User is offline   tailgunner 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 2,848
  • Joined: 09-April 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 08:26 AM

odumbo's white son.
0

#8 User is offline   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 15,436
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 09:53 AM

Bradley Manning should have been shot for treason rather than released from prison by Barry Soetero.

"EVDA" sounds like another alphabet soup agency filled with litte-big men, power-trippers, and other assorted lifelong bureaucrats. We know what's going on. They don't want Manning or even Julian Assange. They want to tie all of this to PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump.

So why is Manning resisting? Because he has a lot of goods that will land him back in jail. He also risks exposing Wikileaks operations and the operatives. The prosecution will squeeze him for dirt on Trump. Sure, Manning can lie about what he knows. But those lies would be exposed and they would throw Manning into a dark hole forever.

Then there's the possibility that Manning has absolutely nothing on Trump. That he doesn't even have enough to make up a lie. The prosecution will lock him away for "process crimes" faster than you can say "Michael Cohen".

Manning knows all of this. As do the "EVDA", the Democrats, and the dark money funders. I bet the 200+ FBI agents at the pre-dawn raid will draw straws to see who frisk-pats Manning.
0

#9 User is online   Tikk 

  • Oh Rrrrrreeeaaaally?
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 8,881
  • Joined: 16-December 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 11:06 AM

Would it be sentenced to a prison for men, or a prison for women?
0

#10 User is offline   tailgunner 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 2,848
  • Joined: 09-April 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 11:59 AM

View PostTikk, on 08 March 2019 - 11:06 AM, said:

Would it be sentenced to a prison for men, or a prison for women?


Women if his junk was cut off.
0

#11 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,788
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 08 March 2019 - 12:08 PM

View Postgravelrash, on 08 March 2019 - 09:53 AM, said:

Bradley Manning should have been shot for treason rather than released from prison by Barry Soetero.

"EVDA" sounds like another alphabet soup agency filled with litte-big men, power-trippers, and other assorted lifelong bureaucrats. We know what's going on. They don't want Manning or even Julian Assange. They want to tie all of this to PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump.

So why is Manning resisting? Because he has a lot of goods that will land him back in jail. He also risks exposing Wikileaks operations and the operatives. The prosecution will squeeze him for dirt on Trump. Sure, Manning can lie about what he knows. But those lies would be exposed and they would throw Manning into a dark hole forever.

Then there's the possibility that Manning has absolutely nothing on Trump. That he doesn't even have enough to make up a lie. The prosecution will lock him away for "process crimes" faster than you can say "Michael Cohen".

Manning knows all of this. As do the "EVDA", the Democrats, and the dark money funders. I bet the 200+ FBI agents at the pre-dawn raid will draw straws to see who frisk-pats Manning.


:yeahthat:
0

#12 User is offline   Squirrel 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,170
  • Joined: 24-September 18

Posted 08 March 2019 - 12:58 PM

Anyone thatís been in the millatary knows he got a get out of jail free card by the democrats. Any other soldier that did what he did would have been treated a lot differently. But hey he didnít have a race card to play so he played anouther. Itís all equal rights until you need a get out of jail free victim card. Then itís oh Iím equal but not,,,, because....... please they are railroading me. Seems a standard play lately
0

#13 User is online   johnnybravo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 3,893
  • Joined: 16-July 03

Posted 08 March 2019 - 09:18 PM

View PostSquirrel, on 08 March 2019 - 12:58 PM, said:

Anyone thatís been in the millatary knows he got a get out of jail free card by the democrats. Any other soldier that did what he did would have been treated a lot differently. But hey he didnít have a race card to play so he played anouther. Itís all equal rights until you need a get out of jail free victim card. Then itís oh Iím equal but not,,,, because....... please they are railroading me. Seems a standard play lately

I think the whole ďtransitionĒ thing was a ruse to get leniency. If you knew you were staring down the most likely outcome of spending the rest of your life in prison as a traitor who would get beat up daily, and the President says hey, I got a deal for you, I think a lot of people would drop their pants and say start cutting.
0

#14 User is offline   Squirrel 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,170
  • Joined: 24-September 18

Posted 08 March 2019 - 09:42 PM

I vote he because thatís what he is goes to manhien or leveanworth in male population. Iím the millatary May have changed some since I got out. But Iíd still like to think those guys wouldnít appreciate what he did. But thatís more then he deserves

This post has been edited by Squirrel: 08 March 2019 - 09:42 PM

0

#15 User is online   erp 

  • Undead Undead Undead
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 37,853
  • Joined: 29-November 03

Posted 09 March 2019 - 08:56 AM

View PostLadybird, on 08 March 2019 - 07:34 AM, said:

Sub-moronic.

That Barrack keeps calling his wife, Michael? Yes, I agree.
0

#16 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,788
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 09 March 2019 - 12:32 PM

View PostSquirrel, on 08 March 2019 - 12:58 PM, said:

Anyone thatís been in the millatary knows he got a get out of jail free card by the democrats. Any other soldier that did what he did would have been treated a lot differently. But hey he didnít have a race card to play so he played anouther. Itís all equal rights until you need a get out of jail free victim card. Then itís oh Iím equal but not,,,, because....... please they are railroading me. Seems a standard play lately


:yes:
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users