RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: What About a Biden Impeachment Inquiry? - RightNation.US

Jump to content

What About a Biden Impeachment Inquiry? He also did what Trump is accused of. Rate Topic: -----

#81 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,793
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 24 November 2019 - 02:27 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 24 November 2019 - 08:32 AM, said:

Increasingly shrill? I’m dealing with mentally handicapped people, who keep posting same fn thing over and over despite it having being addressed multiple times.

AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN - HUNTER WAS NOT PERSONALLY UNDER ANY INVESTIGATION.

You don’t know wtf you are talking about and are not functional enough to help yourself to facts.


:biglaugh: Says one himself. Boy, you freeloader leftists love projection.


View PostThat_Guy, on 24 November 2019 - 08:43 AM, said:

“There was no pressure from anyone from the U.S. to close cases against Zlochevsky. It was shelved by Ukrainian prosecutors in 2014 and through 2015.” --former Deputy Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaly Kasko



View PostThat_Guy, on 24 November 2019 - 11:46 AM, said:



:lol:

Keep at it, Chester. I can smell the stench a mile away...

0

#82 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,793
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 24 November 2019 - 02:29 PM

View PostBuckwheat Jones, on 24 November 2019 - 12:46 PM, said:

...gee. “Two unnamed sources who said they heard that...” vs The Horse’s Mouth.

Have you learned nothing from Schiff’s Sh!t Show?


Nope, he_hasn't.

View PostHowsithangin, on 24 November 2019 - 08:44 AM, said:

Because we can't believe that you're that <censored>ing stupid, obtuse and naive


Parse that bitch, AnToon!


:yeahthat:
0

#83 User is offline   JerryL 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 12,892
  • Joined: 06-October 03

Posted 24 November 2019 - 03:43 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 24 November 2019 - 08:32 AM, said:

Increasingly shrill? I’m dealing with mentally handicapped people, who keep posting same fn thing over and over despite it having being addressed multiple times.

AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN - HUNTER WAS NOT PERSONALLY UNDER ANY INVESTIGATION.

You don’t know wtf you are talking about and are not functional enough to help yourself to facts.

Burisma was being investigated. Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma. Joe Biden forced the firing of the prosecutor investigating Burisma.

Why would Hunter Biden have to be named?
Do you think that Joe didn’t know his son was on the board of Burisma that was being investigated by the prosecutor that he had fired by threatening to block $1B in aid?

Now for some tricky questions that no leftist has had the stones to answer:

What qualifications did Hunter possess that were worth between $50K and $80K à month in an industry in which he had zero experience?
His dad was « point man » on Ukraine policy. Could that have anything...anything at all...to do with Hunter’s hiring?
Is it within the realm of possibility that Burisma hired doper Biden for...wait for it...access?
Why would you NOT want that investigated?

This post has been edited by JerryL: 24 November 2019 - 03:45 PM

0

#84 User is offline   That_Guy 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 20,806
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 24 November 2019 - 03:56 PM

View PostJerryL, on 24 November 2019 - 03:43 PM, said:

Burisma was being investigated


“Shokin was not investigating. He didn’t want to investigate Burisma...And Shokin was fired not because he wanted to do that investigation, but quite to the contrary, because he failed that investigation.”

Quote

Why would you NOT want that investigated


Ukraine Prosecutor Says No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Bidens

This post has been edited by That_Guy: 24 November 2019 - 03:58 PM

0

#85 User is offline   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 16,032
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 24 November 2019 - 04:34 PM

Hey_Genius, Zelensky is doing the right thing. He reopened the investigation into Burisma and the previous President of Ukraine with a new prosecutor who is not under threat by Joe Biden, Barry Soetero, or Marie Yovanovitch. There is that matter of Congressional Democrats threatening to cut off aid to Ukraine unless he can dig up dirt on PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump.
0

#86 User is offline   AntonToo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 15,525
  • Joined: 28-September 04

Posted 25 November 2019 - 01:51 PM

View Postcorporal_little, on 24 November 2019 - 09:20 AM, said:

What you’re saying simply isn’t true.

Shokin said he was investigating Burisma and that he was fired because he wouldn’t back away from it:

"Biden was acting not like a U.S. vice president, but as an individual," Shokin told ABC News, "like the individual interested in having me removed -- having me gone so that I did not interfere in the Burisma investigation."

https://abcnews.go.c...ory?id=63820806


When you respond and say "What you’re saying simply isn’t true." I would expect some sort of contradiction to what I said to follow.

It's not at all contradictory to say that Biden personally was not under any investigation, even though (maybe) a company he was on a board of was.

Howisithanging keeps asserting that Joe's son was under investigation for some sort of malfeasance, which is false - no one (not even Sholkin) has ever claimed any actual malfeasance on Hunter Biden's part (except of course politicos in this country).

It is concievable that Biden would possibly act corruptly to save his son from criminal investigation, but to leverage American foreign policy over Hunter's salary at Burisma? Thats just not credible for someone saddling up to possibly run a presidential campaign.

As far as Sholkin - his bare word is worth f-all. He was fired for corruption by the Ukranian Congress due to Joe Biden's efforts, OF COURSE he will try to say that he got a raw deal, OF COURSE he is going to talk sh about Joe.

If Sholkin had actual evidence Joe acted not out of deep concern for the fact that rich and powerful in Ukraine were avoiding prosecution by lining prosecutor's pockets, but out personal financial interests of his son, then lets see it. He and his man Lutsenko seem to have Nunes, Juliani and Solomon on the speed dial.

This post has been edited by AntonToo: 25 November 2019 - 01:52 PM

0

#87 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 29,383
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 25 November 2019 - 03:02 PM

The klown tag team of AT and TG (hey if you alternate the initials you get TAGT for TAG Team!) are now saying that:

1) Although Biden made a direct threat to hold up a billion bucks unless a certain prosecutor was fired, and although the major thing the prosecutor was pushing for was an investigation of the business Hunter Biden was a highly paid board member for, there’s zero suspicion that father Biden was using pressure to help son Biden.

2) Although Trump made no direct threats and made no indirect threats, although Trump only wanted Ukraine to go after corruption, and although Ukraine leaders have all said there was no pressure from Trump, BUT because a few democrat no-names said they know someone who knows someone who heard someone say that Trump did actually apply pressure, obviously trump should be impeached.

Is that about right?

This post has been edited by zurg: 25 November 2019 - 03:03 PM

0

#88 User is offline   corporal_little 

  • What is your major malfunction....
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 8,673
  • Joined: 09-January 04

Posted 25 November 2019 - 04:37 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 25 November 2019 - 01:51 PM, said:

When you respond and say "What you’re saying simply isn’t true." I would expect some sort of contradiction to what I said to follow.

It's not at all contradictory to say that Biden personally was not under any investigation, even though (maybe) a company he was on a board of was.

Howisithanging keeps asserting that Joe's son was under investigation for some sort of malfeasance, which is false - no one (not even Sholkin) has ever claimed any actual malfeasance on Hunter Biden's part (except of course politicos in this country).

It is concievable that Biden would possibly act corruptly to save his son from criminal investigation, but to leverage American foreign policy over Hunter's salary at Burisma? Thats just not credible for someone saddling up to possibly run a presidential campaign.

As far as Sholkin - his bare word is worth f-all. He was fired for corruption by the Ukranian Congress due to Joe Biden's efforts, OF COURSE he will try to say that he got a raw deal, OF COURSE he is going to talk sh about Joe.

If Sholkin had actual evidence Joe acted not out of deep concern for the fact that rich and powerful in Ukraine were avoiding prosecution by lining prosecutor's pockets, but out personal financial interests of his son, then lets see it. He and his man Lutsenko seem to have Nunes, Juliani and Solomon on the speed dial.


If you are on the board of a company that’s getting investigated, you are being investigated too. That’s how it works.

This entire thing stinks to high heaven. The only person not getting their pockets lined is the dude you want to impeach.
0

#89 User is offline   AntonToo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 15,525
  • Joined: 28-September 04

Posted 25 November 2019 - 09:41 PM

View Postcorporal_little, on 25 November 2019 - 04:37 PM, said:

If you are on the board of a company that’s getting investigated, you are being investigated too. That’s how it works.

This entire thing stinks to high heaven. The only person not getting their pockets lined is the dude you want to impeach.


Well no, that is not how it works. Just because a company is getitng investigated doesn't mean it has to do with something that you, as one of the board members did. Investigation in Burisma was about happenings in period of 2012-2014, which was before Biden was even on the board.

I think it's ironic that Hunter getting paid a salary as a board member of a company stinks ot high heaven to you, but Trump having PERSONAL FINANCIAL STAKES AND ENTAGLEMENTS all over the world doesn't register as a legitimate ethical concern.

We've had recently Mattis finally calling it quits when Trump, against ALL foreign policy advisement let Turks roll over Kurds. And this would come as no suprise if you paid attention to prior reporting of how much money Trump Co. makes in Turkey. Bolton recently said that he belives personal financial interests are strongly influencing Trump's descisions on Turkey.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGdsAZPXYAIkhzh.jpg

Erdogan himself cut the ceremonial ribon at the opening of those Trump towers.

This post has been edited by AntonToo: 25 November 2019 - 09:41 PM

0

#90 User is offline   JerryL 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 12,892
  • Joined: 06-October 03

Posted 26 November 2019 - 06:03 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 25 November 2019 - 09:41 PM, said:

Well no, that is not how it works. Just because a company is getitng investigated doesn't mean it has to do with something that you, as one of the board members did. Investigation in Burisma was about happenings in period of 2012-2014, which was before Biden was even on the board.

So if a company is being investigated for corruption, did that corruption simply stop because the coke-head son of a Democrat VP became a member of their board? OR...bear with me on this...could the hiring of a coke-head who has no experience and no qualifications for the job, but who DOES happen to be the son of a Democrat VP (who currently is the administration's point man on policy for YOUR country), actually be an INDICATION OF corruption? Hmmmmmm........

View PostAntonToo, on 25 November 2019 - 09:41 PM, said:

I think it's ironic that Hunter getting paid a salary as a board member of a company stinks ot high heaven to you, but Trump having PERSONAL FINANCIAL STAKES AND ENTAGLEMENTS all over the world doesn't register as a legitimate ethical concern.

Donald Trump did not go to work for a foreign company with ZERO qualifications for the position in a country for which his father was the point man for US policy.

DJT built his real estate portfolio before going into government. He is not in control of it now, while President. What do you want him to do, sell it all?

How about taking a stab at these questions? I am very interested in seeing your thoughts.

View PostJerryL, on 24 November 2019 - 03:43 PM, said:

Now for some tricky questions that no leftist has had the stones to answer:

What qualifications did Hunter possess that were worth between $50K and $80K à month in an industry in which he had zero experience?
His dad was « point man » on Ukraine policy. Could that have anything...anything at all...to do with Hunter’s hiring?
Is it within the realm of possibility that Burisma hired doper Biden for...wait for it...access?
Why would you NOT want that investigated?

0

#91 User is offline   That_Guy 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 20,806
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 26 November 2019 - 07:19 AM

View PostJerryL, on 26 November 2019 - 06:03 AM, said:

an INDICATION OF corruption


Ukraine Prosecutor Says No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Bidens

Quote

sell it all


Watchdog group: Trump had over 1,400 conflicts of interest in first two years
0

#92 User is offline   Moderator T 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 37,708
  • Joined: 02-October 03

Posted 26 November 2019 - 08:46 AM

View PostThat_Guy, on 26 November 2019 - 07:19 AM, said:


You're really leaning on a liberal "watchdog" group run by Clinton and Obama people and funded by George Soros as somehow being relevant?
0

#93 User is offline   That_Guy 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 20,806
  • Joined: 02-September 06

Posted 26 November 2019 - 08:56 AM

View PostModerator T, on 26 November 2019 - 08:46 AM, said:

leaning on a liberal "watchdog" group


You can always take it from Trump himself:

“I have a little conflict of interest because I have a major, major building in Istanbul”
0

#94 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,793
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 26 November 2019 - 10:13 AM

View PostThat_Guy, on 26 November 2019 - 07:19 AM, said:



:bs:

View PostModerator T, on 26 November 2019 - 08:46 AM, said:

You're really leaning on a liberal "watchdog" group run by Clinton and Obama people and funded by George Soros as somehow being relevant?


Of course he_is.

View PostThat_Guy, on 26 November 2019 - 08:56 AM, said:



:yawn:

View PostAntonToo, on 25 November 2019 - 09:41 PM, said:

Well no, that is not how it works. Just because a company is getitng investigated doesn't mean it has to do with something that you, as one of the board members did. Investigation in Burisma was about happenings in period of 2012-2014, which was before Biden was even on the board.

I think it's ironic that Hunter getting paid a salary as a board member of a company stinks ot high heaven to you, but Trump having PERSONAL FINANCIAL STAKES AND ENTAGLEMENTS all over the world doesn't register as a legitimate ethical concern.

We've had recently Mattis finally calling it quits when Trump, against ALL foreign policy advisement let Turks roll over Kurds. And this would come as no suprise if you paid attention to prior reporting of how much money Trump Co. makes in Turkey. Bolton recently said that he belives personal financial interests are strongly influencing Trump's descisions on Turkey.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGdsAZPXYAIkhzh.jpg

Erdogan himself cut the ceremonial ribon at the opening of those Trump towers.


:bs:

View PostAntonToo, on 25 November 2019 - 01:51 PM, said:

When you respond and say "What you’re saying simply isn’t true." I would expect some sort of contradiction to what I said to follow.

It's not at all contradictory to say that Biden personally was not under any investigation, even though (maybe) a company he was on a board of was.

Howisithanging keeps asserting that Joe's son was under investigation for some sort of malfeasance, which is false - no one (not even Sholkin) has ever claimed any actual malfeasance on Hunter Biden's part (except of course politicos in this country).

It is concievable that Biden would possibly act corruptly to save his son from criminal investigation, but to leverage American foreign policy over Hunter's salary at Burisma? Thats just not credible for someone saddling up to possibly run a presidential campaign.

As far as Sholkin - his bare word is worth f-all. He was fired for corruption by the Ukranian Congress due to Joe Biden's efforts, OF COURSE he will try to say that he got a raw deal, OF COURSE he is going to talk sh about Joe.

If Sholkin had actual evidence Joe acted not out of deep concern for the fact that rich and powerful in Ukraine were avoiding prosecution by lining prosecutor's pockets, but out personal financial interests of his son, then lets see it. He and his man Lutsenko seem to have Nunes, Juliani and Solomon on the speed dial.


:bs:

View Postcorporal_little, on 25 November 2019 - 04:37 PM, said:

If you are on the board of a company that’s getting investigated, you are being investigated too. That’s how it works.

This entire thing stinks to high heaven. The only person not getting their pockets lined is the dude you want to impeach.


:yes:
0

Share this topic:


  • 5 Pages +
  • « First
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users