RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Whistleblower Sets Off a Battle Involving Trump, Who Denies Wrongdoing - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Whistleblower Sets Off a Battle Involving Trump, Who Denies Wrongdoing Rate Topic: -----

#121 User is offline   Natural Selection 

  • Decrypt the truth
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 18,294
  • Joined: 31-December 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 10:11 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 23 September 2019 - 08:29 AM, said:

For a politico, Obama ran a very clean ship and was never shown to have been involved any serious wrongdoing. He knew and respected laws and ethics and that is a major reason why I was a big fan and why his administration has had zero indictments let alone convictions.


Why was Hillary Clinton not indicted for the following? (from the Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System)



Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

(link to full statement)



The reason there were no indictments in the Obama administration is because they were all corrupt and covering for each other.
0

#122 User is offline   JerryL 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 12,636
  • Joined: 06-October 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:04 AM

View PostNatural Selection, on 23 September 2019 - 10:11 AM, said:



The reason there were no indictments in the Obama administration is because they were all corrupt and covering for each other.

Yep.

And if someone like Jeb Bush has won, you wouldn’t see anything like you are now. Trump is not from the swamp and swamp creatures can’t stand him.
0

#123 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,076
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:11 AM

View PostJerryL, on 23 September 2019 - 09:26 AM, said:

You are completely full of "horsecrap" about Obama. Remember all the deliberate lies and counting on the American People, like you, to be dumb as posts to get Obamacare passed? Remember Fast and Furious? Remember blaming Benghazi on a video no one watched? Remember all his divisive racial rhetoric?

Seriously, I don't expect anything else from you. You are a leftist and, as such, you don't give a <censored> about how your agenda moves forward as long as it does move forward. We get it.

As for Trump...he is not a politician and doesn't act like one and, as someone with limited intelligence, you can't figure him out. Yet, he still lives rent free in your head and it is hilarious.


:yes:
0

#124 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,076
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:13 AM

View PostNoclevermoniker, on 23 September 2019 - 10:00 AM, said:

A brain completely without function. And yet, you type...


What one would call a "robot".

This post has been edited by RedSoloCup: 23 September 2019 - 11:14 AM

0

#125 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,076
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:15 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 23 September 2019 - 08:29 AM, said:

Baseless horsecrap.

For a politico, Obama ran a very clean ship and was never shown to have been involved any serious wrongdoing. He knew and respected laws and ethics and that is a major reason why I was a big fan and why his administration has had zero indictments let alone convictions.

Trump is waaaay over on the other side of the spectrum in the way he is without any shame expanding and testing just how much he can get away with.


Clintons and most politicians like Pence are somewhere in the middle - you know they’ll play the politico games all day long, but you know they still operate with at least some shred of conscience and respect (fear?) of laws.


:biglaugh: :biglaugh:

This post has been edited by RedSoloCup: 23 September 2019 - 11:16 AM

0

#126 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,076
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:17 AM

View PostNatural Selection, on 23 September 2019 - 10:11 AM, said:

Why was Hillary Clinton not indicted for the following? (from the Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System)



Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

(link to full statement)



The reason there were no indictments in the Obama administration is because they were all corrupt and covering for each other.



:exactly:

And the FBI being in on the take was no help either.
0

#127 User is offline   erp 

  • Undead Undead Undead
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 38,036
  • Joined: 29-November 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:26 AM

View PostRedSoloCup, on 23 September 2019 - 11:17 AM, said:

:exactly:

And the FBI being in on the take was no help either.

Is that the “fear of law” Anton said the Clintons operate under?

Must be nice.
0

#128 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,871
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 23 September 2019 - 11:41 AM

View PostNatural Selection, on 23 September 2019 - 10:11 AM, said:

Why was Hillary Clinton not indicted for the following? (from the Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System)



Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

(link to full statement)



The reason there were no indictments in the Obama administration is because they were all corrupt and covering for each other.

“You rightwingers never provide any evidence and blindly follow your fuhrer trump who could shoot someone in the middle of a street and you’d still support him.”

That’ll be Anton’s response, after he ignores yours.
0

#129 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 58,656
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 03:38 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 22 September 2019 - 11:35 PM, said:

One plus one equals two. Very predictable, but that doesn't mean it's not true.

But when it comes to Republican response to Trump swamp one plus one equals...zero. It's all just fine by you.

As he said before, he could walk outside in broad day light, shoot someone and many will still support him. Over time that part became less and less hyperbolic to the point that by now I'm pretty sure that enough righties will find a way to rationalize even that with some bs about Clintons making murder normal (they killed people and got away with it doncha' know!!!).


See, Anton? LOL

See what kind of crap you post, but then cry and whine that all you get in return are insults instead of serious debate? OF COURSE there's no opening for "serious debate" with you. It would be like trying to debate with a goldfish.

But I guess it's what we must expect. After all, anybody who can delude himself that the Obama administration was "clean" or "ethical" or "never involved in any wrongdoing" has serious mental deficiencies.

B)
0

#130 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 36,402
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 23 September 2019 - 04:01 PM

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/uploads/1568107919/med_gallery_6518_223_44574.png
0

#131 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,076
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 23 September 2019 - 05:18 PM

View PostMTP Reggie, on 23 September 2019 - 04:01 PM, said:

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/uploads/1568107919/med_gallery_6518_223_44574.png



:welldone: Was wondering when this would re-appear.
0

#132 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 58,656
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 06:02 PM

Nope, never mind. I'm gonna remember Mod T's plea from last time.

B)

This post has been edited by MontyPython: 23 September 2019 - 06:03 PM

0

#133 User is offline   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,457
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 06:25 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 21 September 2019 - 01:06 PM, said:

Lol - the very definition of false choice.

Republicans want to investigate Democrats? No problem, in fact they did for years and years and years - found nothing.

Want to investigate these assertions about improprieties under Obama?. GO AHEAD

None of that either refutes or recuses in any shape or form the Trump swamp right before your nose.


You still believe there was probable cause to conduct an investigation on Trump, talk about false anything.

0

#134 User is offline   Buckwheat Jones 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 8,854
  • Joined: 08-May 03

Posted 23 September 2019 - 07:53 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 23 September 2019 - 08:29 AM, said:

Baseless horsecrap.

For a politico, Obama ran a very clean ship and was never shown to have been involved any serious wrongdoing. He knew and respected laws and ethics and that is a major reason why I was a big fan and why his administration has had zero indictments let alone convictions.

Trump is waaaay over on the other side of the spectrum in the way he is without any shame expanding and testing just how much he can get away with.

Clintons and most politicians like Pence are somewhere in the middle - you know they’ll play the politico games all day long, but you know they still operate with at least some shred of conscience and respect (fear?) of laws.

I think if you cannot recognize obamas scandals with the IRS, Benghazi et al, you’re just not worth the bandwidth. Adios.
0

#135 User is offline   Howsithangin 

  • The more ppl I meet, the more I like my cats
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,336
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 23 September 2019 - 08:24 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 23 September 2019 - 08:29 AM, said:


For a politico, Obama ran a very clean ship and was never shown to have been involved any serious wrongdoing. He knew and respected laws and ethics and that is a major reason why I was a big fan and why his administration has had zero indictments let alone convictions.

Trump is waaaay over on the other side of the spectrum in the way he is without any shame expanding and testing just how much he can get away with.

Clintons and most politicians like Pence are somewhere in the middle - you know they’ll play the politico games all day long, but you know they still operate with at least some shred of conscience and respect (fear?) of laws.


: :lol: :lol3: :rofl: :lol2: :woot:

This officially smothers the last particulate of legitimacy that you may have had left.

You're officially done.
0

Share this topic:


  • 7 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • This topic is locked

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users