RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Emails Show Obama State Department’s Role In Anti-Trump Coup Cabal - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Emails Show Obama State Department’s Role In Anti-Trump Coup Cabal Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Liz 

  • ***-----------***
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 51,433
  • Joined: 28-February 03

  Posted 18 June 2019 - 11:11 PM

Emails Show Obama State Department’s Role In Anti-Trump Coup Cabal

Breitbart
By TOM FITTON
17 Jun 2019

Excerpt:

John Kerry, President Obama’s secretary of state, seems to be having trouble staying within the legal bounds of the Logan Act, so it’s not surprising that his State Department lieutenants were getting their hands dirty in the conspiracy to bring down Donald Trump.

Judicial Watch now has received more evidence of this anti-Trump conspiracy. With The Daily Caller News Foundation, they just released 16 pages of documents revealing senior State Obama officials – Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Special Coordinator for Libya Jonathan Winer – coordinated with incoming House Majority Whip Steny Hoyer’s (D-MD) national security advisor, Daniel Silverberg, to work on Russia dossier information provided by Christopher Steele.

Steele was surreptitiously paid by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to create the infamous anti-Trump dossier used to justify a series of FISA spy warrants targeting Carter Page. Winer is a former Obama State Department deputy assistant secretary who was implicated in working with Steele and Clinton associate Sidney Blumenthal to circulate the anti-Trump dossier.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on April 25, 2018, on behalf of ourselves and The Daily Caller News Foundation against the State Department after it failed to respond to three separate FOIA requests (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv- 00968)). The lawsuit seeks:

  • All records of communications between State Department officials, including former Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, on the one hand, and British National Christopher Steele and/or employees or contractors of Steele’s company, Orbis Business Intelligence, on the other hand.
  • All records and/or memoranda provided by Christopher Steele and/or his firm Orbis Business Intelligence or by others acting on Steele’s/Orbis’s behalf, to State Department officials.
  • Any and all records in the custody of the State Department related to the provision of documents to British national Christopher Steele and/or his firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, or the receipt of documents from Steele or his firm. Time period is January 20, 2009 through the present.
  • All records created in 2016 by Jonathan M. Winer relating to research compiled by Christopher Steele.

Here is some of what we learned from these documents.

*snip*

Full Story
0

#2 User is offline   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,275
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 18 June 2019 - 11:33 PM

Now that we are peeling back this onion of fraud we are finding the actual law breakers. This goes right to the top period.
0

#3 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 58,135
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 19 June 2019 - 12:50 AM

:sinister:
0

#4 User is offline   Jon Wayne 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 860
  • Joined: 03-August 15

Posted 19 June 2019 - 02:41 AM

Fox News investigators have been reporting on the coup cabal for two years. Meanwhile, Democraps get the spotlight with their grotesque Congressional inquisitions and new hate-Trump media lies every day. Frankly, the whole thing is a giant snoozefest to me now. It all comes down to Bill Barr indicting Obama's henchmen or not.
0

#5 User is offline   Dean Adam Smithee 

  • School of the Cold Hard Facts
  • View gallery
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 21,289
  • Joined: 11-December 04

Posted 19 June 2019 - 10:42 AM

Alger Hiss was only the tip of the iceberg of everything that was wrong, has been wrong, and CONTINUES to be wrong with the State Dep't ever since WWII.

EtA: Just look at how consistently they've been wrong about nearly EVERY hot spot and hot issue in the world since WWII. Including but not limited to, just in my adult lifetime, everthing from completely misreading Iran pre-'79 to more recently the complete F###-up of Benghazi or the Iran sanctions-lifting "deal".

It's just not humanly possibly for an organization to be THAT wrong on THAT many things THAT consistently merely from incompetence. Heck, even if the entire State Department was 100% staffed by people who just got off the short bus from the local 'special needs' facility and each given a quarter to flip as their decision-making process you'd expect them to get it right at least HALF the time, eh?

This post has been edited by Dean Adam Smithee: 19 June 2019 - 11:00 AM

0

#6 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,553
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 19 June 2019 - 04:40 PM

So we have the answer to “did Obama know?”
0

#7 User is offline   Squirrel 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,165
  • Joined: 24-September 18

Posted 19 June 2019 - 08:00 PM

View Postzurg, on 19 June 2019 - 04:40 PM, said:

So we have the answer to “did Obama know?”

I’m guessing the answer we have = “ is this a left free thread?”.
0

#8 User is offline   AntonToo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 15,435
  • Joined: 28-September 04

Posted 19 June 2019 - 09:50 PM

https://itcsecure.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/totw270718.jpg

Does anyone on the right actually know the meaning of the word COUP? Our idiot President likes to speak in hyperbolic terms to keep up the drama and play up his victimhood, but why the hell are righties nodding right along to this lunatic nonsence?


coup
/ko͞o/

noun

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"



Violent? - Nope, no violence involved in the Russian interference investigation.
Illegal? - Nope, nothing illegal found about the investigation.

There is is no COUP here, just crazy fantasies.
0

#9 User is offline   Liz 

  • ***-----------***
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 51,433
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 19 June 2019 - 10:11 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 19 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

https://itcsecure.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/totw270718.jpg

Does anyone on the right actually know the meaning of the word COUP? Our idiot President likes to speak in hyperbolic terms to keep up the drama and play up his victimhood, but why the hell are righties nodding right along to this lunatic nonsence?


coup
/ko͞o/

noun

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"



Violent? - Nope, no violence involved in the Russian interference investigation.
Illegal? - Nope, nothing illegal found about the investigation.

There is is no COUP here, just crazy fantasies.

Calm down, Anton. There are literally dozens of definitions for the word coup. Feel free to look them up.
0

#10 User is offline   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 15,393
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 19 June 2019 - 10:37 PM

All the evidence of subterfuge, sedition, and treason presented. What? Too many syllables for you, silly buns? Did someone miss the lesson on the differences between definitive, exaggerated, and hyperbolic?

2. a notable or successful stroke or move.

Which is why the conspiracy to rig the election then undo the result are referred to as "attempted" and "failed" coups. Nothing to do with military use of force. An illegal seizure of power just the same.
0

#11 User is offline   Noclevermoniker 

  • Wire Dachsies Matter
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 17,191
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 19 June 2019 - 10:54 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 19 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

https://itcsecure.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/totw270718.jpg

Does anyone on the right actually know the meaning of the word COUP? Our idiot President likes to speak in hyperbolic terms to keep up the drama and play up his victimhood, but why the hell are righties nodding right along to this lunatic nonsence?


coup
/ko͞o/

noun

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"



Violent? - Nope, no violence involved in the Russian interference investigation.
Illegal? - Nope, nothing illegal found about the investigation.

There is is no COUP here, just crazy fantasies.

Sit down, shut up, and pay attention. Try to lay off the moron pills you’re taking.
0

#12 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 58,135
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 12:55 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 19 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

https://itcsecure.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/totw270718.jpg

Does anyone on the right actually know the meaning of the word COUP? Our idiot President likes to speak in hyperbolic terms to keep up the drama and play up his victimhood, but why the hell are righties nodding right along to this lunatic nonsence?


coup
/ko͞o/

noun

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"



Violent? - Nope, no violence involved in the Russian interference investigation.
Illegal? - Nope, nothing illegal found about the investigation.

There is is no COUP here, just crazy fantasies.


LOLOLOL

Anton, you of all people trying to give lessons in the proper use of the English Language is hilarious indeed. And your endless denial of the corruption on "your side" of the political aisle makes it even more laughable. You're exactly the sort of mindless dupe the left depends on.

:rolleyes:
0

#13 User is online   JerryL 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 12,494
  • Joined: 06-October 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 04:42 AM

View PostMontyPython, on 20 June 2019 - 12:55 AM, said:

LOLOLOL

Anton, you of all people trying to give lessons in the proper use of the English Language is hilarious indeed. And your endless denial of the corruption on "your side" of the political aisle makes it even more laughable. You're exactly the sort of mindless dupe the left depends on.

:rolleyes:


Definition of coup d'état
: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics
Click Here Antoon

If you go even one click beyond the google results page, where his definition is found, a whole world of depth opens up.

Stupid and lazy.

This post has been edited by JerryL: 20 June 2019 - 05:03 AM

0

#14 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,718
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 20 June 2019 - 04:59 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 19 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

https://itcsecure.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/totw270718.jpg

Does anyone on the right actually know the meaning of the word COUP? Our idiot President likes to speak in hyperbolic terms to keep up the drama and play up his victimhood, but why the hell are righties nodding right along to this lunatic nonsence?


coup
/ko͞o/

noun

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"



Violent? - Nope, no violence involved in the Russian interference investigation.
Illegal? - Nope, nothing illegal found about the investigation.

There is is no COUP here, just crazy fantasies.


Here's a quarter. Call someone who cares.

View PostLiz, on 19 June 2019 - 10:11 PM, said:

Calm down, Anton. There are literally dozens of definitions for the word coup. Feel free to look them up.


He's just begging for another time out.
0

#15 User is offline   erp 

  • Undead Undead Undead
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 37,806
  • Joined: 29-November 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 05:14 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 19 June 2019 - 09:50 PM, said:

https://itcsecure.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/totw270718.jpg

Does anyone on the right actually know the meaning of the word COUP? Our idiot President likes to speak in hyperbolic terms to keep up the drama and play up his victimhood, but why the hell are righties nodding right along to this lunatic nonsence?


coup
/ko͞o/

noun

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"



Violent? - Nope, no violence involved in the Russian interference investigation.
Illegal? - Nope, nothing illegal found about the investigation.

There is is no COUP here, just crazy fantasies.

What about #2 in your inquiry?

“2.
a notable or successful stroke or move.“


But maybe you are right. They were not successful. At least you admit they tried. ;)
0

#16 User is offline   erp 

  • Undead Undead Undead
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 37,806
  • Joined: 29-November 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 05:19 AM

Notice what the left is defending now? They are defending words. Not actions.

Posters like Anton are kinda like the canary in the coal mine. They tend to reveal the latest talking points coming out.


I just wish the DOJ would get to it if they are, in fact, going to get to it.
0

#17 User is offline   AntonToo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 15,435
  • Joined: 28-September 04

Posted 20 June 2019 - 09:45 AM

View PostLiz, on 19 June 2019 - 10:11 PM, said:

Calm down, Anton. There are literally dozens of definitions for the word coup. Feel free to look them up.


Straw grasping.

There is not a single definition of COUP anywhere (excluding alt-fact universes) that would apply here.


What are we talking about here?

Rosenstein, a Republican Trump apointee (who no one accused of anything last I checked), was entertaining the possiblity of using a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS (24th amendment) to LEGALLY remove from office a possibly compromised President, who has just behaded the FBI leadership over the Russian interference investigation.
0

#18 User is online   JerryL 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 12,494
  • Joined: 06-October 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 10:05 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 20 June 2019 - 09:45 AM, said:

Straw grasping.

There is not a single definition of COUP anywhere (excluding alt-fact universes) that would apply here.


What are we talking about here?

Rosenstein, a Republican Trump apointee (who no one accused of anything last I checked), was entertaining the possiblity of using a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS (24th amendment) to LEGALLY remove from office a possibly compromised President, who has just behaded the FBI leadership over the Russian interference investigation.

Manufacturing and using a bogus intel dossier to fraudulently obtain warrants to spy on a legitimate political campaign. Using the same bogus intel dossier to justify an investigation that worked for 2 years to find ANY reason, including investigating far beyond the mandate of Russian collusion, that could be used to remove a legitimately elected President.

Here is a definition from Webster's Dictionary:

Definition of coup d'état
: a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics
(The link is a couple of posts up.)

Now before you go all English professor on me, "coup d'etat" is routinely shortened to "coup" and this definition was a hot button from within the definition of "coup."

So if you put the word "attempted" or "failed" in front of the word "coup," then coup was entirely appropriate for what has happened. Well that is, unless, Webster's is part of the "alt-fact universe" and functionally illiterate Russian immigrants are now English language arbiters. I don't think, though, that that is the case.
0

#19 User is offline   Noclevermoniker 

  • Wire Dachsies Matter
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 17,191
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 10:22 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 20 June 2019 - 09:45 AM, said:

Straw grasping.

There is not a single definition of COUP anywhere (excluding alt-fact universes) that would apply here.


What are we talking about here?

Rosenstein, a Republican Trump apointee (who no one accused of anything last I checked), was entertaining the possiblity of using a CONSTITUTIONAL PROCESS (24th amendment) to LEGALLY remove from office a possibly compromised President, who has just behaded the FBI leadership over the Russian interference investigation.

MORE CAPS, ANTON!!!! YOU CAN DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0

#20 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 58,135
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 20 June 2019 - 12:41 PM

Oh for the love of Gawd Anton, don't you EVER get tired of making a complete fool of yourself???

It's almost painful to watch you humiliate yourself again and again and again...

...almost, LOL.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
0

Share this topic:


  • 4 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users