RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Judicial Watch: Strzok-Page Emails Dispute Hillary Clinton's Claim - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Judicial Watch: Strzok-Page Emails Dispute Hillary Clinton's Claim That She ‘Never Received nor Sent Any Material That Was Marked Classif Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 36,800
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 15 November 2019 - 07:29 AM

Judicial Watch Obtains Strzok-Page Emails Disputing Hillary Clinton's Claim That She 'Never Received nor Sent Any Material That Was Marked Classified'
NOVEMBER 12, 2019
JUDICIAL WATCH

<MUCH More Here>

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received from the U.S. Department of Justice 119 pages of records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) revealing that, after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's statement denying the transmission of classified information over her unsecure email system, former FBI official Peter Strzok sent an email to FBI officials citing "three [Clinton email] chains" containing © [classified] portion marks in front of paragraphs."

The records containing emails from Strzok and former FBI attorney Lisa Page also reveal senior FBI officials' concerns over articles written about the "tarmac meeting" between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Strzok specifically cited a CBS News report terming the meeting "shocking, absolutely shocking," and adding that, "the appearance of impropriety is just stunning."

The document production came in response to Judicial Watch's January 24, 2018, lawsuit filed after the Department of Justice failed to respond to a December 4, 2017, FOIA request (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). Judicial Watch seeks:

  • All records of communications, including but not limited to, emails, text messages and instant chats, between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page;
  • All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Peter Strzok;
  • All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Lisa Page.


In a July 4, 2016, email exchange with Priestap, Moffa, and unidentified Office of the General Counsel officials, a Daily Beast article titled "Is Hillary Clinton Telling the Truth About Emails?" is discussed in which Clinton is quoted saying that she never sent or received emails with material marked classified.

Strzok: There are three chains totaling 8 or 9 emails which have © [classified] portion marks in front of paragraphs. Some have both © and (SBU) [sensitive but unclassified] in front of different paragraphs in the same email. During a brief a few weeks ago Jon provided a copy of the emails in question.

All were released in the 30,000 FOIA production. One of the chains contains multiple B1 [national defense or foreign policy] redactions, indicating it is currently classified Confidential; the other two chains were released in full. We do not yet have determinations from State about their classification at the time of writing.

On June 29, 2016, Strzok forwards Page a story about the meeting between Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the Phoenix airport tarmac just days before Clinton's criminal investigation interview. Strzok highlights an excerpt in which CBS News's Justice Reporter Paul Reid called the meeting, "shocking, absolutely shocking" also that, "the appearance of impropriety is just stunning." The excerpt ends with Reid saying: "[Lynch] stood up to El Chapo, she has taken on FIFA – she is not incapable to telling someone, 'Look, you can't come on my plane' or 'Look, I don't want to talk to you.'"

The documents also show that on May 23, 2016, Strzok; FBI Office of Congressional Affairs' Elizabeth Beers; Principal Deputy General Counsel for the FBI Trisha Anderson; FBI Deputy Assistant Director in the Counterintelligence Division Jonathan Moffa; and another redacted senior FBI official have an email exchange about how to respond to a letter sent from Senator Chuck Grassley to then-FBI Director Comey asking a series of pointed questions focusing on why FBI personnel working on Clinton's email server case (Midyear Exam/MYE) were required to sign a special non-disclosure agreement (NDA) above and beyond the normal rules in place that govern disclosure of sensitive information by FBI personnel.

Grassley asked for copies of the special NDA and if any agents refused to sign.

(snip)

<MUCH More Here>

This post has been edited by MTP Reggie: 15 November 2019 - 10:28 AM

0

#2 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 59,545
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:30 AM

*GASP*

Hillary was......she was......was......lying???

:o
0

#3 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,215
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 15 November 2019 - 10:11 AM

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/uploads/1568107919/gallery_6133_220_74835.jpg
0

#4 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,983
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 15 November 2019 - 11:29 AM

Perhaps those many, many voices inside Hillary's head urging her to run aren't referring to a presidential campaign but rather to get out while she still gets the option of choosing bright orange as a fashion statement...
0

#5 User is offline   Bookdoc 

  • Daddy's little girl
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,269
  • Joined: 07-September 05

Posted 15 November 2019 - 09:02 PM

View PostTicked@TinselTown, on 15 November 2019 - 11:29 AM, said:

Perhaps those many, many voices inside Hillary's head urging her to run aren't referring to a presidential campaign but rather to get out while she still gets the option of choosing bright orange as a fashion statement...

I do wonder sometimes whether she and obozo have checked which countries we don't have extradition treaties with. Obozo can live with his brother muslims but I doubt anyone wants a powerless hildebeast. Might even be a few people looking for her...
0

#6 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,983
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 16 November 2019 - 12:28 AM

View PostBookdoc, on 15 November 2019 - 09:02 PM, said:

I do wonder sometimes whether she and obozo have checked which countries we don't have extradition treaties with. Obozo can live with his brother muslims but I doubt anyone wants a powerless hildebeast. Might even be a few people looking for her...


To discuss her no refund policy, I would imagine.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users