Breitbart: “Wait ‘Til They See What Happens March 1st” Was Andrew Breitbart's death really "natural"?
#1
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:46 AM
Breitbart: “Wait ‘Til They See What Happens March 1st”
Breitbart died hours before planned release of damning Obama footage
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, March 2, 2012
In a stunning coincidence, It appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.
Around three weeks ago on February 9 during the ‘Blog Bash’ event in Washington DC, Breitbart made a prophetic comment that takes on a somewhat chilling nature given the fact that he died in the early hours of March 1st.
Speaking to Lawrence Sinclair of Sinclair News, Breitbart stated, “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.”
It’s almost certain that Breitbart was referring to his plan to release damning footage of President Obama that he had been promising to reveal throughout the month of February.
As we reported yesterday, Breitbart spoke of his intention to release the tape during his CPAC speech last month. The footage shows Obama in his college days appearing alongside former Weather Underground terrorists Bill and Bernardine Dohrn. Observers had speculated that the footage could have derailed Obama’s hopes for a second term.
“I’ve got video from his college days that show you why racial division and class warfare are central to what hope and change was sold in 2008 – the videos are going to come out,” said Breitbart, adding that Obama would be vetted.
FULL STORY:
#2
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:52 AM
This post has been edited by SLFAKE: 02 March 2012 - 11:54 AM
#4
Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:59 AM
Furthermore, where IS the footage, and can it still be released?
Andrew was by himself when he had what appeared to be a heart attack. Was he a regular at the bar where he had a few glasses of wine before walking home? Was he there to meet someone, or had someone suggested he meet them there?
How difficult is it to kill someone with a heart condition, and make it look "natural"? It's not difficult; it's way to easy. It's easy to find someone to do it, and even find someone to do it that doesn't know he or she is about to cause a heart attack.
But, with George Soros having as much money as he does counting on Obama's re-election, the cost of an assassin would be like losing a nickel in the couch cushions.
I'm not suggesting Andrew Breitbart was murdered; I don't see any evidence of that. But, his death is coincidental enough that I think it should be careful investigated as a possible murder.
This post has been edited by furrpiece: 02 March 2012 - 12:00 PM
#6
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:16 PM
That tells me he probably didnt take proper care of himself.
#7
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:18 PM
In college, Obama was said by fellow students to be a radical, a Muslim, a poor student, and gay.
In fact, before entering politics, he apparently wasn't even "in the closet" very much.
Mom of Murdered Obama Gay Lover Speaks Up
Posted on July 25, 2010 by Dr. Eowyn
Donald Young
In late May, Wash. DC-based investigative journalist Wayne Madsen had a bombshell revelation about Obama’s membership in a Chicago gay club, Man’s Country. Madsen also reported on Obama’s sexual relationships with other men, including named D.C. politicians and Donald Young, the openly-gay choir-director of the church in Chicago of which Obama was a member for some 20 years — Jeremy Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ black liberation theology. Obama’s relationship with Young was confirmed by Larry Sinclair, who claims to have had two sex-cocaine trysts with Obama.
Larry Bland
There were two other openly gay men in Wright’s church: Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. In late 2007, as Obama began his ascent to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, in a span of 1˝ months, all three men “conveniently” died:
■Bland was murdered execution-style on November 17, 2007;
■Young was murdered execution-style on December 24, 2007;
■Spencer reportedly died of septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV on December 26, 2007. (Death certificates of Bland and Young, HERE.)
FULL STORY
#8
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:22 PM
#9
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:23 PM
furrpiece, on 02 March 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:
Furthermore, where IS the footage, and can it still be released?
Andrew was by himself when he had what appeared to be a heart attack. Was he a regular at the bar where he had a few glasses of wine before walking home? Was he there to meet someone, or had someone suggested he meet them there?
How difficult is it to kill someone with a heart condition, and make it look "natural"? It's not difficult; it's way to easy. It's easy to find someone to do it, and even find someone to do it that doesn't know he or she is about to cause a heart attack.
But, with George Soros having as much money as he does counting on Obama's re-election, the cost of an assassin would be like losing a nickel in the couch cushions.
I'm not suggesting Andrew Breitbart was murdered; I don't see any evidence of that. But, his death is coincidental enough that I think it should be careful investigated as a possible murder.
Jesus H. Christ, Furr - did you even bother to read the links and comments I (and others) posted? Bannon has the tapes. They're due to be released within the next week or so. You're tilting at windmills and it's unbecoming.
#10
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:34 PM
CherylynK, on 02 March 2012 - 12:22 PM, said:
That's easy; you're heart stops, so naturally, you die.
#12
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:43 PM
furrpiece, on 02 March 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:
I agree. I don't know if its a denial of him passing that I want to blame someone to be honest or if its the coincidence of what he said at CPAC with the videos. Maybe it's both. But I hope it's something his wife thinks about carefully. I hope she doesn give blind faith to L.A. Coroner's Office. I would hire someone to do a private autopsy because he was such a force in the political arena. It just makes you wonder.
#13
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:44 PM
Jax, on 02 March 2012 - 12:23 PM, said:
Morning, Jax. No; I looked at some of the additional comments, and just jumped to the New Topic button.
Besides, I'm probably going to be condemned by some for starting a Tin Foil Hat thread. But, I felt like the thread you started was not only a different topic, but much more dignified and uplifting in tone.
But, as today is Texas Independence Day, I had breakfast with a former Air Force flight surgeon who also does some work for law enforcement agencies. We discussed Andrew Breitbart's amazingly coincidental death, even though he had a heart condition.
That he and I both know of several drugs (and "processes") that can cause a heart attack in a heart patient that leaves no trace, was also discussed.
That the tapes will be aired on Hannity is good news; but that fact doesn't shed any light on whether someone in a familiar large house in Washington, and especially his pal Soros, wouldn't benefit greatly by A.B.'s absence from our midst.
[Don Quixote mode/off]
#14
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:49 PM
That's the way it works, folks.
#15
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:50 PM
furrpiece, on 02 March 2012 - 12:44 PM, said:
Besides, I'm probably going to be condemned by some for starting a Tin Foil Hat thread. But, I felt like the thread you started was not only a different topic, but much more dignified and uplifting in tone.
But, as today is Texas Independence Day, I had breakfast with a former Air Force flight surgeon who also does some work for law enforcement agencies. We discussed Andrew Breitbart's amazingly coincidental death, even though he had a heart condition.
That he and I both know of several drugs (and "processes") that can cause a heart attack in a heart patient that leaves no trace, was also discussed.
That the tapes will be aired on Hannity is good news; but that fact doesn't shed any light on whether someone in a familiar large house in Washington, and especially his pal Soros, wouldn't benefit greatly by A.B.'s absence from our midst.
[Don Quixote mode/off]
Well, gee, why bother paying any heed to what people who actually knew him and worked with him closely have said? Much more fun this way, I suppose. Thanks for at least taking it to a different thread. Knock yourself out. This is quite productive.
#16
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:53 PM
natural_selection, on 02 March 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:
I went over to your link and was reading some of the comments. I think I saw one our own in there posting under an unknown nom-de-plume. The comment was:
"You can't stop the signal, Mal."
Let's see who can guess who I'm talking about before he says anything.
#17
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:54 PM
You can Google "frank marshall davis gay", and you will be treated to some interesting sites about Obama's childhood Communist mentor, and possibly one of the first people Obama had sex with.
#18
Posted 02 March 2012 - 12:59 PM
Jax, on 02 March 2012 - 12:50 PM, said:
I was planning to do both. But, since this new thread was likely to generate some traffic on its own, I felt it would be a distraction for the other thread, make it longer and more difficult to get through, and this one certainly didn't have the same "tone" as the other one.
#19
Posted 02 March 2012 - 01:03 PM
Jax, on 02 March 2012 - 12:50 PM, said:
Jax; you know I luv ya, but take it a little easy. Someone floating an alternative to the "official" narrative is what people do, when curiosity strikes. If people want to question the official explanation; then instead of us acting as though they are beneath contempt, we should let it be discussed with alternative theories. Just like the Obama birther stuff. Just because most people accept the "official" explanation doesn't mean everyone does, or should. I'm not a birther, but I defend others their thoughts on why they think that there aren't enough answers.
#20
Posted 02 March 2012 - 01:11 PM
This conspiracy theory is just nuts.
This post has been edited by pict: 02 March 2012 - 01:18 PM





Help




















