Facebook Co-Founder Renounces US Citizenship For Tax Reasons
#1
Posted 13 May 2012 - 12:45 PM
RedOrbit.com
May 13, 2012
Too short to excerpt:
One of the four co-founders of social networking website Facebook has renounced his US citizenship prior to the company’s initial public offering (IPO) — a move that could save him millions in taxes, according to a Friday report by Bloomberg‘s Danielle Kucera, Sanat Vallikappen and Christine Harper.
As Kucera, Valikappen, and Harper first reported, Brazilian-born billionaire Eduardo Saverin, one of the men who helped Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg create the social media juggernaut, has surrendered his citizenship in the United States in favor of Singapore, where he currently resides and where there are no capital gains tax.
“Eduardo recently found it more practical to become a resident of Singapore since he plans to live there for an indefinite period of time,” Tom Goodman, a spokesman for Saverin, told Bloomberg via email.
With Facebook’s forthcoming IPO being valued for as much as $96 billion, it could save the 30-year-old entrepreneur as much as $600 million when he opts to sell his shares of the company, Foxnews.com has reported. His name was listed among those on an IRS document revealing individuals who have chosen to expatriate, which was released on April 30, according to news reports.
David Goldman of CNNMoney said that it is not currently known exactly how much of the company Saverin currently owns. The Facebook co-founder, who is no longer actively involved in its day-to-day operations, owned 5% of the website as recently as 2009, Goldman said, citing the David Kirkpatrick book “The Facebook Effect.”
However, he has sold off some of those shares in the past three years, as he was not listed as one of those owning at least 5% of the company in Facebook’s pre-IPO regulatory filings, the CNNMoney reporter added.
“The move, which sees him turn his back on the country in which he made his fortune, will no doubt outrage Americans,” the Daily Mail reported in a May 11 article. “And the 30-year-old is hardly strapped for cash, becoming famous for his playboy lifestyle in Singapore, where he buys bottles of champagne at the most exclusive clubs for supermodels and the super-rich.”
Some view Saverin’s move as a result of flaws in US federal tax regulations.
In an article for Forbes.com, Daniel J. Mitchell of the Cato Institute said, “It is very sad that America’s tax system is so onerous that some rich people feel they have no choice but to give up U.S. citizenship in order to protect their family finances… there’s also lots of evidence of taxpayers escaping countries controlled by politicians who get too greedy. Mr. Saverin is just the latest example.”
“The statists say these people are ‘tax traitors’ and ‘economic Benedict Arnolds,’ but those views are based on a quasi-totalitarian ideology that assumes government has some sort of permanent claim on people’s economic output,” he added. “If people are leaving America because our tax law is onerous, that’s a signal we should reform the tax code. Attacking those who expatriate is the fiscal version of blaming the victim.”
(link to article)
Atlas Shrugged...a real-life example.
#2
Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:03 PM
#4
Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:55 PM
natural_selection, on 13 May 2012 - 12:45 PM, said:
RedOrbit.com
May 13, 2012
Too short to excerpt:
One of the four co-founders of social networking website Facebook has renounced his US citizenship prior to the company's initial public offering (IPO) — a move that could save him millions in taxes, according to a Friday report by Bloomberg's Danielle Kucera, Sanat Vallikappen and Christine Harper.
As Kucera, Valikappen, and Harper first reported, Brazilian-born billionaire Eduardo Saverin, one of the men who helped Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg create the social media juggernaut, has surrendered his citizenship in the United States in favor of Singapore, where he currently resides and where there are no capital gains tax.
"Eduardo recently found it more practical to become a resident of Singapore since he plans to live there for an indefinite period of time," Tom Goodman, a spokesman for Saverin, told Bloomberg via email.
With Facebook's forthcoming IPO being valued for as much as $96 billion, it could save the 30-year-old entrepreneur as much as $600 million when he opts to sell his shares of the company, Foxnews.com has reported. His name was listed among those on an IRS document revealing individuals who have chosen to expatriate, which was released on April 30, according to news reports.
David Goldman of CNNMoney said that it is not currently known exactly how much of the company Saverin currently owns. The Facebook co-founder, who is no longer actively involved in its day-to-day operations, owned 5% of the website as recently as 2009, Goldman said, citing the David Kirkpatrick book "The Facebook Effect."
However, he has sold off some of those shares in the past three years, as he was not listed as one of those owning at least 5% of the company in Facebook's pre-IPO regulatory filings, the CNNMoney reporter added.
"The move, which sees him turn his back on the country in which he made his fortune, will no doubt outrage Americans," the Daily Mail reported in a May 11 article. "And the 30-year-old is hardly strapped for cash, becoming famous for his playboy lifestyle in Singapore, where he buys bottles of champagne at the most exclusive clubs for supermodels and the super-rich."
Some view Saverin's move as a result of flaws in US federal tax regulations.
In an article for Forbes.com, Daniel J. Mitchell of the Cato Institute said, "It is very sad that America's tax system is so onerous that some rich people feel they have no choice but to give up U.S. citizenship in order to protect their family finances… there's also lots of evidence of taxpayers escaping countries controlled by politicians who get too greedy. Mr. Saverin is just the latest example."
"The statists say these people are 'tax traitors' and 'economic Benedict Arnolds,' but those views are based on a quasi-totalitarian ideology that assumes government has some sort of permanent claim on people's economic output," he added. "If people are leaving America because our tax law is onerous, that's a signal we should reform the tax code. Attacking those who expatriate is the fiscal version of blaming the victim."
(link to article)
Atlas Shrugged...a real-life example.
I'm not outraged. It's a perfectly understandable move.
#6
Posted 13 May 2012 - 02:31 PM
What perplexes is me is how the frup is Facebook valued at $96 billion?!? Can't eat it. Can't drink it. It doesn't heat your house. Can't even wipe your butt with it.
It's all in what people are willing to pay. If I had that kind of savvy, dang straight that I would invent or invest in the next big thing. As it is, I don't have an FB account nor do I ever directly go to Facebook.
#7
Posted 13 May 2012 - 03:02 PM
Cheers to him and to all rich people who are realizing they can just up and leave.
#8
Posted 13 May 2012 - 03:05 PM
natural_selection, on 13 May 2012 - 12:45 PM, said:
my thoughts exactly
Can't blame him one bit.
needmoreammo, on 13 May 2012 - 03:02 PM, said:
gotta "spread the wealth" around, according to Bo-Bo
#9
Posted 13 May 2012 - 03:11 PM
gravelrash, on 13 May 2012 - 02:31 PM, said:
What perplexes is me is how the frup is Facebook valued at $96 billion?!? Can't eat it. Can't drink it. It doesn't heat your house. Can't even wipe your butt with it.
It's all in what people are willing to pay. If I had that kind of savvy, dang straight that I would invent or invest in the next big thing. As it is, I don't have an FB account nor do I ever directly go to Facebook.
Facebook is good for when this site goes down. It gives us a place to complain to Lisa.
#10
Posted 13 May 2012 - 06:32 PM
#11
Posted 13 May 2012 - 07:00 PM
hakeem, on 13 May 2012 - 06:32 PM, said:
I don't think he has to pay taxes on the value of his Facebook stock until he sells it. Stock sales are considered capital gains when they are worth more than they cost. In this case, they cost him very little and will net him a huge capital gain. If he is no longer a US citizen he will not have to pay capital gains tax to the US government.
It would be great if we could get an accountant to weigh in on this.
#12
Posted 13 May 2012 - 11:43 PM
Me: Yeah, the Europeans who moved to Monaco because they don't have an income tax. Or, like most of them, buy a condo there and claim it's their primary residence. American corporations have been doing this for years, so why not citizens? You either do like the Kennedys and keep your wealth in offshore tax shelters or you leave.
#13
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:07 AM
natural_selection, on 13 May 2012 - 07:00 PM, said:
It would be great if we could get an accountant to weigh in on this.
Nope, he will have to pay an "exit tax" on all his assets. His Facebook stock will be valued at the IPO price and I'm sure he's expecting it to rise significantly above that. But he will be paying tax on it. Congress passed a bill specifically to discourage this type of thing.
#14
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:24 AM
What coward deleted my previous post on this?
This post has been edited by Rock N' Roll Right Winger: 14 May 2012 - 01:28 AM
#15
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:40 AM
#16
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:03 AM
#17
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:33 AM
He may pay the exit tax; however he should not be subject to US capital gains taxes.
The fact is money has legs, and will go where it has to in order to survive.
#18
Posted 14 May 2012 - 07:15 AM
This post has been edited by ASE: 14 May 2012 - 07:16 AM
#20
Posted 14 May 2012 - 09:06 AM
ASE, on 14 May 2012 - 07:15 AM, said:
There are qualifiers:
Quote
If you expatriated after June 16, 2008, the new IRC 877A expatriation rules apply to you if any of the following statements apply.
Your average annual net income tax for the 5 years ending before the date of expatriation or termination of residency is more than a specified amount that is adjusted for inflation ($145,000 for 2009 and 2010, $147,000 for 2011, and $151,000 for 2012).
Your net worth is $2 million or more on the date of your expatriation or termination of residency.
You fail to certify on Form 8854 that you have complied with all U.S. federal tax obligations for the 5 years preceding the date of your expatriation or termination of residency.
IRC 877A(g)(4) provides that a citizen will be treated as relinquishing his or her U.S. citizenship on the earliest of four possible dates: (1) the date the individual renounces his or her U.S. nationality before a diplomatic or consular officer of the U.S., provided the renunciation is subsequently approved by the issuance to the individual of a certificate of loss of nationality by the U.S. Department of State; (2) the date the individual furnishes to the U.S. Department of State a signed statement of voluntary relinquishment of U.S. nationality confirming the performance of an act of expatriation specified in paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of section 349(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481(a)(1)-(4)), provided the voluntary relinquishment is subsequently approved by the issuance to the individual of a certificate of loss of nationality by the U.S. Department of State; (3) the date the U.S. Department of State issues to the individual a certificate of loss of nationality; or (4) the date a U.S. court cancels a naturalized citizen's certificate of naturalization.
<snip>
IRC 877A imposes a mark-to-market regime, which generally means that all property of a covered expatriate is deemed sold for its fair market value on the day before the expatriation date. IRC 887A further provides that any gain arising from the deemed sale is taken into account for the taxable year of the deemed sale notwithstanding any other provisions of the Code. Any loss from the deemed sale is taken into account for the taxable year of the deemed sale to the extent otherwise provided in the Code, except that the wash sale rules of IRC 1091 do not apply.
<Bold mine>
Source
If I read this correctly Saveri's Facebook asset would be valued at it's price the day before he renounced his citizenship. He could still benefit from it without selling it for ten years, or place it in a trust that would shelter him from any significant tax liabilities.
Bottom line is he'll find a way. . .





Help























