RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Tips For Reading Washington Post Stories About Trump Based On - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tips For Reading Washington Post Stories About Trump Based On Anonymous Leaks Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Liz 

  • ~***~
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 46,463
  • Joined: 28-February 03

  Posted 17 May 2017 - 01:13 AM

Tips For Reading Washington Post Stories About Trump Based On Anonymous Leaks

In the midst of an active shooter situation, we have tips for how to judge breaking news. We need similar tips to manage anti-Trump breaking news.

The Federalist
By Mollie Hemingway
May 16, 2017

Excerpt:

On May 10, the Washington Post‘s Philip Rucker, Ashley Parker, Sari Horwitz, and Robert Costa claimed:

[Deputy Attorney General Rod J.] Rosenstein threatened to resign after the narrative emerging from the White House on Tuesday evening cast him as a prime mover of the decision to fire Comey and that the president acted only on his recommendation, said the person close to the White House, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

But the “person close to the White House” who made the claim without using his or her name was contradicted by none other than Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein himself. The next day he said, “I’m not quitting” when asked by reporters. “No,” he said to the follow-up question of whether he had threatened to quit.

On May 10, Ashley Parker wrote:

Last week, then-FBI Director James B. Comey requested more resources from the Justice Department for his bureau’s investigation into collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, according to two officials with knowledge of the discussion.

The story was based on anonymous sources, naturally, and noted “The news was first reported by the New York Times.” If true, it would support a narrative that Trump had fired Comey not due to his general incompetence but because he was trying to thwart a legitimate and fruitful investigation. Anonymous sources again had something very different to say from people whose comments were tied to their names, who all denied the report. The Justice Department spokeswoman immediately responded that the claim was false, and her quote was included in the story:

Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said reports that Comey had requested more funding or other resources for the Russia investigation are ‘totally false.’ Such a request, she said, ‘did not happen.’

The next day under oath, acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe repeatedly denied that the probe into Russia was undersourced or requiring any additional funds. In response to one question about whether the FBI had sufficient resources to investigate, he said:

‘If you are referring to the Russia investigation, I do. I believe we have the adequate resources to do it and I know that we have resourced that investigation adequately,’ acting FBI director Andrew McCabe told lawmakers, adding that he was unaware of any request by the agency for additional resources.

Previous Washington Post stories sourced to anonymous “officials” have fallen apart, including Josh Rogin’s January 26 report claiming that “the State Department’s entire senior management team just resigned” as “part of an ongoing mass exodus of senior Foreign Service officers who don’t want to stick around for the Trump era.”

The story went viral before the truth caught up. As per procedure, the Obama administration had, in coordination with the incoming Trump administration, asked for the resignations of all political appointees. While it would have been traditional to let them stay for a few months, the Trump team let them know that their services wouldn’t be necessary. The entire story was wrong.

*snip*

The Rest
0

#2 User is offline   firecoco 

  • Yes! We! Can!
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 14,171
  • Joined: 21-October 03

Posted 17 May 2017 - 07:14 AM

It should be criminal what the Washington compost is doing
0

#3 User is online   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 23,052
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 17 May 2017 - 11:56 AM

View Postfirecoco, on 17 May 2017 - 07:14 AM, said:

It should be criminal what the Washington compost is doing


What you are seeing is a coordinated coup. This is a destabilization operation by leftists inside and outside our nation to overthrow a seated President. They have been telling you all along they are planning in impeaching this President.
0

#4 User is offline   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 11,025
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 17 May 2017 - 01:44 PM

View PostTaggart Transcontinental, on 17 May 2017 - 11:56 AM, said:

What you are seeing is a coordinated coup. This is a destabilization operation by leftists inside and outside our nation to overthrow a seated President. They have been telling you all along they are planning in impeaching this President.


Just shows that Democrats don't believe in democracy.
0

#5 User is offline   Noclevermoniker 

  • Got Wiener?
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 14,277
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 17 May 2017 - 02:50 PM

View Postgravelrash, on 17 May 2017 - 01:44 PM, said:

Just shows that Democrats don't believe in democracy.

Oh, they do...when they win.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users