RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban To Take Effect - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban To Take Effect Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   LongKnife 

  • Don't start none, won't be none.
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 2,916
  • Joined: 10-November 04

  Posted 04 December 2017 - 04:53 PM

Supreme Court Allows Full Trump Travel Ban To Take Effect

The Hill
By Lydia Wheeler
12/04/17 04:19 PM EST

<Excerpt>

The Supreme Court on Monday gave President Trump another major win by granting his administration’s request to fully reinstate the third version of his travel ban.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and a federal district court in Maryland had said Trump could only block the entry of nationals from the six majority-Muslim countries in the ban — Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad — if they lacked a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. The high court’s decision now puts those rulings on hold.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor said they would have denied the government’s request.

"We are not surprised by today's Supreme Court decision permitting immediate enforcement of the President's proclamation limiting travel from countries presenting heightened risks of terrorism," said White House spokesman Hogan Gidley.

"The proclamation is lawful and essential to protecting our homeland. We look forward to presenting a fuller defense of the proclamation as the pending cases work their way through the courts," Gidley said.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, meanwhile, called it a “substantial victory for the safety and security of the American people.”

“We are pleased to have defended this order and heartened that a clear majority Supreme Court has allowed the President’s lawful proclamation protecting our country’s national security to go into full effect,” he said in a statement. “The Constitution gives the President the responsibility and power to protect this country from all threats foreign and domestic, and this order remains vital to accomplishing those goals.”

<snip>

More winning here

This post has been edited by Liz: 05 December 2017 - 03:15 PM
Reason for edit: To replace an AP story with one from another source

0

#2 User is offline   Moderator T 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 35,808
  • Joined: 02-October 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 05:01 PM

Breyer and Kagan sided with the Conservatives here. This wasn't a 5/4 narrow split.
0

#3 User is online   Censport 

  • @CensportRacing
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 14,479
  • Joined: 13-August 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 05:17 PM

 LongKnife, on 04 December 2017 - 04:53 PM, said:

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place.

Ginsburg would have said the same whether she stayed awake to hear the case or not.
0

#4 User is offline   firecoco 

  • Yes! We! Can!
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 14,514
  • Joined: 21-October 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 05:27 PM

This means Sotomayor and Ginsburg don’t understand the Constitution
0

#5 User is offline   swede1962 

  • Look, Ma! I'm a Wag-Toon!!
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 3,594
  • Joined: 28-April 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:14 PM

It's not so much a ban on travelers from "six majority-Muslim countries" as it is a ban on travelers from "six utter anarchy hellholes" .

Just sayin'



0

#6 User is online   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 11,455
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:18 PM

Seven out of nine Supreme Court Justices agree with Barry Soetero.
0

#7 User is online   ThePatriot 

  • Warpaint
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 26,559
  • Joined: 17-August 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:37 PM

 firecoco, on 04 December 2017 - 05:27 PM, said:

This means Sotomayor and Ginsburg don’t understand the Constitution

Ginsburg will die in the middle of case rather than retire during Trump's presidency.
0

#8 User is offline   firecoco 

  • Yes! We! Can!
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 14,514
  • Joined: 21-October 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:44 PM

 ThePatriot, on 04 December 2017 - 06:37 PM, said:

Ginsburg will die in the middle of case rather than retire during Trump's presidency.

I agree....I think Kennedy wants to retire
0

#9 User is online   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 11,455
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 06:48 PM

 ThePatriot, on 04 December 2017 - 06:37 PM, said:

Ginsburg will die in the middle of case rather than retire during Trump's presidency.


You will know when SCOTUS hearings are on pay-per-view.
0

#10 User is offline   Rock N' Roll Right Winger 

  • Pissing off all of the right people
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 24,696
  • Joined: 14-October 03

Posted 04 December 2017 - 09:14 PM

 firecoco, on 04 December 2017 - 05:27 PM, said:

This means Sotomayor and Ginsburg don’t understand the Constitution

Oh they understand it alright.

They just choose to disregard it, ignore it and do the exact opposite of it every time.
0

#11 User is offline   Howsithangin 

  • I'm dethpicable
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 25,005
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 05 December 2017 - 03:21 AM

View PostCensport, on 04 December 2017 - 05:17 PM, said:

Ginsburg would have said the same whether she stayed awake to hear the case or not.


Funny! Sad and true, but funny.
0

#12 User is offline   satellite66 

  • No more RHINOs!!!
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 5,113
  • Joined: 27-November 03

Posted 05 December 2017 - 08:33 AM

My local news in their report of this said that Supreme Court without explanation allows Trump's travel ban but decision is not final
No bias there
0

#13 User is online   ThePatriot 

  • Warpaint
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 26,559
  • Joined: 17-August 03

Posted 05 December 2017 - 08:49 AM

View Postgravelrash, on 04 December 2017 - 06:48 PM, said:

You will know when SCOTUS hearings are on pay-per-view.

Ok, that made me laugh. :lol3:
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users