News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Reported FBI probe of Trump was led by anti-Trump - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Reported FBI probe of Trump was led by anti-Trump fanatics who betrayed Constitution Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,075
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 13 January 2019 - 01:22 AM


Newt Gingrich: Reported FBI probe of Trump was led by anti-Trump fanatics who betrayed Constitution

Fox News
Newt Gingrich | Opinion
January 12, 2019


The extraordinary story published Friday night in The New York Times headlined “F.B.I. Opened Inquiry into Whether Trump was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia” tells us how deeply sick the Washington establishment has become.

A group of bureaucrats – elected by no one – sat in a room and decided they would investigate the new president of the United States for possible treason. Let me repeat: treason. This is, after all, the implication of this investigation.

This group of bureaucrats reports to no one in elected authority. In a Justice Department where employees gave 97 percent of their presidential campaign contributions to Hillary Clinton, the hostility toward – and fear of – newly elected President Trump was deep.

The senior members of the Justice Department (all promoted under the Obama administration) were clearly prepared to go all-out to repudiate the verdict of the American people in the 2016 election.

Further, these were Justice Department bureaucrats who had ignored the Clinton Foundation scandals, minimized the investigation into the Clinton email and Internet scandal, and ignored former President Clinton collecting money from Russians overseas while his wife was secretary of state.

Suddenly, these hitherto passive, dispassionate, and tolerant “law enforcement” bureaucrats were galvanized into investigating a president for possible treason.

When they made this decision, who did they share it with? Obviously, they could not go to President Trump, since he was the target of their investigation.

In an orderly world, they might have gone to Vice President Mike Pence and briefed him. Pence, after all, was a member of the U.S. House and governor of Indiana before he was vice president. There is no taint of any scandal involving anything Pence has ever done.

If these Justice Department anti-Trump fanatics were afraid to go to the White House, they could have briefed the leaders of the Judiciary and the Intelligence committees in the House and Senate. At that point they would have had some potential reality check.



<bold mine>

But of course they didn't brief anyone because, as we all know but some won't admit, it was a rogue investigation from the start to overturn the election.

#2 User is offline   BootsieBets 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 664
  • Joined: 13-August 18

Posted 13 January 2019 - 12:35 PM

And all the while they sat idly by and did nothing after Obama had expressed his willingness (which we all heard!) to be more flexible with Putin after his final election to the presidency. That was fine – no collusion or obstruction or treason there, no, not a smidgen (to use Obama’s own words.)


#3 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,822
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 13 January 2019 - 08:51 PM

I know a lot of people don't like Newt, but I do.

He has the historical knowledge to provide context when he speaks and he's been around long enough to have real life knowledge of the worst of the swamp dwellers and call out their agendas without making it seem like the groundless accusations that the leftards spew.

Share this topic:

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users