News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Lessons from a Political Martyr - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lessons from a Political Martyr Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   pepperonikkid 

  • Trucker
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 12,900
  • Joined: 03-September 03

  Posted 15 January 2019 - 10:17 AM

Lessons from a Political Martyr

By Josiah Leinbach
January 15, 2019


If politics is anything, it is contentious. So long as men have opinions, they shall defend them, even with fervor at times. But contention is not sedition, and as Democrats' calls to impeach President Trump intensify, it would appear that American politics has moved toward the latter. Both parties believe the other has betrayed its country. Those who once were rivals now are denounced as traitors. He that gathers not is himself scattered.

Where this malice might lead no one knows. But if history is any guide, vindictive politics tend to escalate quickly and end well for no one, especially when guilt matters more than truth. Just ask Thomas Wentworth, the 1st Earl of Strafford.

Strafford was an English noble and political figure in the decade prior to the English Civil Wars. King Charles I raised Strafford to the peerage in 1628 and then appointed him as Lord Deputy of Ireland in 1633. As Lord Deputy, Strafford zealously pursued the crown's interests, something for which he would earn the ire of Charles' many enemies in Parliament.

Charles recalled Strafford to England in 1639 when war broke out against Scotland; and on Strafford's advice, Charles decided to invade Scotland, giving Strafford command of the army. Parliament, however, refused to grant Charles what they considered to be exorbitant war subsidies. In response, Charles prorogued the session in May 1640, and instead told Strafford to raise money through forced loans. But before Strafford could collect sufficient funds, he fell ill, halting all efforts.

When a newly-convened Parliament assembled at Westminster in November 1640, many parliamentary radicals, led by John Pym, saw an opportunity to take down their enemy Strafford, and thereby weaken Charles' position, which was their ultimate goal. Therefore, in January 1641, they impeached Strafford for treason. From the start, it was clear that Strafford was not to receive a fair trial. He was deprived of legal counsel, not informed of the particular charges against him, and forbidden to call witnesses in his defense. Most egregiously, many of the prosecution's witnesses had themselves been previously convicted of conspiracy against both the king and Strafford. Nevertheless, Strafford dismantled the prosecution's arguments, showing how the charges against him often contradicted themselves.

Late in the trial, Pym surreptitiously acquired notes of a privy council meeting written by Sir Henry Vane. Vane's notes claimed that Strafford told Charles, "You have an army in Ireland you may employ here to reduce this kingdom." In his testimony, Vane insisted that the phrase "this kingdom" meant England, though the context of the meeting indicated Scotland. Strafford vehemently denied ever uttering the phrase, as did the others present. Still, Pym declared this to be indisputable proof of Strafford's treason.

But even as many of Strafford's enemies noted, treason was legally defined as acting against the person or office of the king, neither of which Strafford had done. He had served the king faithfully throughout his career. In fact, the radicals had indicted Strafford for that very reason. They had long sought to tread Charles underfoot, but Strafford had thwarted their efforts. In this way, Strafford was not the one on trial -- Charles was.

Full Story

Share this topic:

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users