RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Schumer: Trump's address was 'political, divisive, calculating - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Schumer: Trump's address was 'political, divisive, calculating even nasty at times' Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 34,601
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 06 February 2019 - 11:00 AM

Schumer: Trump's address was 'political, divisive, calculating, even nasty at times'
Devan Cole byline
By Devan Cole, CNN
Updated 9:34 AM ET, Wed February 6, 2019

<More Pissy democrats And ORANGE MAN BAAAAAAAAAAAAD! Here>

President Donald Trump's second State of the Union address was "political, divisive, calculating, even nasty at times," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Wednesday.

"Well, there's very little nice to say about it," Schumer told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I think (the Democratic response from) Stacey Abrams showed the President what real leadership was last night. She was thoughtful, caring. You know, you can't talk about comity and working together and give a speech that is so divisive -- that just doesn't fly," the New York Democrat added.

The President's speech, given Tuesday night in the House chamber before a divided Congress, focused on a litany of policy areas that he hoped to work with Congress on, including his proposed border wall, prescription drug prices and the country's infrastructure. On Wednesday, however, Schumer shrugged off Trump's hopes of working with congressional Democrats on the issues he highlighted.

"So in the areas where he tried to reach out, you know -- drug prices, transportation, infrastructure -- there was no meat, there was no enthusiasm. All the enthusiasm was for the divisive parts like immigration, abortion, things like that. So it was not a good speech," he said, adding that he doesn't believe Trump is able to "give a truly bipartisan speech and start working with us."

Schumer said congressional Democrats did want to work with their Republican counterparts to create a deal on border security that would please both sides, a task that is currently being worked on by negotiators from both parties ahead of another possible government shutdown when current funding for parts of the government runs out in mid-February.

"We're willing to do border security, we always have. We offered border security to the President. So we have always tried to be bipartisan, we have tried to work with our Republican colleagues. And in fact, when the President stays out of it we get it done," he said.

(snip)

<More Pissy democrats And ORANGE MAN BAAAAAAAAAAAAD! Here>

This post has been edited by MTP Reggie: 06 February 2019 - 11:06 AM

0

#2 User is offline   Noclevermoniker 

  • Wire Dachsies Matter
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 16,357
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 11:16 AM

Bless his heart.
0

#3 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 4,062
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 06 February 2019 - 12:16 PM

GFY, Chuck.

He's got the most punchable face, it would be a dream come true for me to carry out that act...:whistling:
0

#4 User is online   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 26,338
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 06 February 2019 - 12:45 PM

Everything chuck says in the quoted segments of the article are wrong or lies. Itís amazing that a leader can actually stoop that low and/or to be so ignorant. Itís truly astonishing to be 100% faulty.
0

#5 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 4,913
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 02:04 PM

View Postzurg, on 06 February 2019 - 12:45 PM, said:

Everything chuck says in the quoted segments of the article are wrong or lies.

:yeahthat:


...but this:

Quote

I think (the Democratic response from) Stacey Abrams showed the President what real leadership was last night. She was thoughtful, caring.

:blink:




...



...



...



...



...



...



:biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh:


It's painfully apparent that they're "grooming" that bag of gap-toothed semi-closeted Marxist blubber for a Senate run. :rolleyes:
0

#6 User is online   Bookdoc 

  • Daddy's little girl
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 4,899
  • Joined: 07-September 05

Posted 06 February 2019 - 05:10 PM

Schumer says they'll do border security if Trump lets Congress handle it. They promise and never follow through. Of course, many of the GOPe feel the same way. Their paymasters insist on it.

This post has been edited by Bookdoc: 06 February 2019 - 05:11 PM

0

#7 User is offline   firecoco 

  • Yes! We! Can!
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 15,754
  • Joined: 21-October 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 05:27 PM

View PostRedSoloCup, on 06 February 2019 - 12:16 PM, said:

GFY, Chuck.

He's got the most punchable face, it would be a dream come true for me to carry out that act...:whistling:

Iíll donate a few bucks
0

#8 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,932
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 05:37 PM

Quote

"Well, there's very little nice to say about it," Schumer told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I think (the Democratic response from) Stacey Abrams showed the President what real leadership was last night. She was thoughtful, caring. You know, you can't talk about comity and working together and give a speech that is so divisive -- that just doesn't fly," the New York Democrat added.


Thus proving you're a partisan hack, you project your own sins on others and you're a disgusting piece of pig droppings, Smirky McSchmuck.
0

#9 User is online   Rock N' Roll Right Winger 

  • Pissing off all of the right people
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 29,252
  • Joined: 14-October 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 06:42 PM

But Chuckie, I guess that you bring all of us together in agreeing that you are indeed a lying manipulative low life scum sucking POS?
0

#10 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 54,748
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 07:55 PM

There's nobody on the face of this planet more political, divisive, calculating and nasty than Chuck Schumer.

I'd tell him to kiss my ass or suck my **** but he'd enjoy it too much.

<_<
0

#11 User is offline   helton 

  • Blueberries good, liberals bad!
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 02-September 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 09:08 PM

He is boxed into a corner and has no choice but to say the idiotic things he keeps saying.

I am proud to say that I have never voted for Schmucky Schumer.
0

#12 User is online   Censport 

  • @CensportRacing
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 16,088
  • Joined: 13-August 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 09:51 PM

Do you ever get the feeling that Democrats write their responses to Trump before they hear what Trump actually says?

Oh, wait...


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxTXR2VWwAYsKDk.jpg
0

#13 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,932
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 06 February 2019 - 09:53 PM

View PostCensport, on 06 February 2019 - 09:51 PM, said:

Do you ever get the feeling that Democrats write their responses to Trump before they hear what Trump actually says?

Oh, wait...


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxTXR2VWwAYsKDk.jpg


She was too busy chewing her cud, muttering to herself and reading her travel itinerary to pay attention to what he was saying.
0

#14 User is offline   oki 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 24,497
  • Joined: 14-October 04

Posted 07 February 2019 - 09:32 AM

Just waiting for him to get stiff, go wide eyed and say I'm chuckie wanna' play?

Oki
0

#15 User is offline   NH Populist 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 830
  • Joined: 30-April 18

Posted 07 February 2019 - 10:12 AM

View PostMontyPython, on 06 February 2019 - 07:55 PM, said:

There's nobody on the face of this planet more political, divisive, calculating and nasty than Chuck Schumer.

I'd tell him to kiss my ass or suck my **** but he'd enjoy it too much.

<_<


If B.S. was money, ol' Chucky would never agree to Socialism, there's no way he'd give his billions away... :coolshades:

This post has been edited by NH Populist: 07 February 2019 - 10:12 AM

0

#16 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 54,748
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 07 February 2019 - 12:24 PM

View PostNH Populist, on 07 February 2019 - 10:12 AM, said:

If B.S. was money, ol' Chucky would never agree to Socialism, there's no way he'd give his billions away... :coolshades:


:lol:
0

#17 User is online   erp 

  • Undead Undead Undead
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 36,852
  • Joined: 29-November 03

Posted 07 February 2019 - 12:32 PM

View Postzurg, on 06 February 2019 - 12:45 PM, said:

Everything chuck says in the quoted segments of the article are wrong or lies. Itís amazing that a leader can actually stoop that low and/or to be so ignorant. Itís truly astonishing to be 100% faulty.

Itís all red meet for donations. They need the money.
0

#18 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 34,601
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 07 February 2019 - 02:07 PM

View Postzurg, on 06 February 2019 - 12:45 PM, said:

It's truly astonishing to be 100% faulty.


I'm surprised you're surprised. RN's lefties are just that. There's even an unsourced chart to prove it.
0

#19 User is offline   Birddog 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Community-Supported
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 22-January 19

Posted 08 February 2019 - 04:32 AM

View PostMTP Reggie, on 06 February 2019 - 11:00 AM, said:

Schumer: Trump's address was 'political, divisive, calculating, even nasty at times'
Devan Cole byline
By Devan Cole, CNN
Updated 9:34 AM ET, Wed February 6, 2019

<More Pissy democrats And ORANGE MAN BAAAAAAAAAAAAD! Here>

President Donald Trump's second State of the Union address was "political, divisive, calculating, even nasty at times," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Wednesday.

"Well, there's very little nice to say about it," Schumer told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "I think (the Democratic response from) Stacey Abrams showed the President what real leadership was last night. She was thoughtful, caring. You know, you can't talk about comity and working together and give a speech that is so divisive -- that just doesn't fly," the New York Democrat added.

The President's speech, given Tuesday night in the House chamber before a divided Congress, focused on a litany of policy areas that he hoped to work with Congress on, including his proposed border wall, prescription drug prices and the country's infrastructure. On Wednesday, however, Schumer shrugged off Trump's hopes of working with congressional Democrats on the issues he highlighted.

"So in the areas where he tried to reach out, you know -- drug prices, transportation, infrastructure -- there was no meat, there was no enthusiasm. All the enthusiasm was for the divisive parts like immigration, abortion, things like that. So it was not a good speech," he said, adding that he doesn't believe Trump is able to "give a truly bipartisan speech and start working with us."

Schumer said congressional Democrats did want to work with their Republican counterparts to create a deal on border security that would please both sides, a task that is currently being worked on by negotiators from both parties ahead of another possible government shutdown when current funding for parts of the government runs out in mid-February.

"We're willing to do border security, we always have. We offered border security to the President. So we have always tried to be bipartisan, we have tried to work with our Republican colleagues. And in fact, when the President stays out of it we get it done," he said.

(snip)

<More Pissy democrats And ORANGE MAN BAAAAAAAAAAAAD! Here>


Coming from Schumer that's rich. He can't say "good morning" without being political, divisive, calculating and frequently nasty.
0

#20 User is offline   Birddog 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Community-Supported
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 22-January 19

Posted 08 February 2019 - 04:34 AM

Quote

I think (the Democratic response from) Stacey Abrams showed the President what real leadership was last night. She was thoughtful, caring.
Abrams was a babbling fool spitting out bumper sticker logic and one liner talking points.

This post has been edited by Birddog: 08 February 2019 - 04:34 AM

0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users