RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Nearly 84,000 Duplicate Voter Records Found In Audit Of California’s - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nearly 84,000 Duplicate Voter Records Found In Audit Of California’s ‘Motor Voter’ System Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Liz 

  • ***-----------***
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 51,335
  • Joined: 28-February 03

  Posted 10 August 2019 - 12:52 AM

Nearly 84,000 Duplicate Voter Records Found In Audit Of California’s ‘Motor Voter’ System

Los Angeles Times
By John Myers Sacramento Bureau Chief
Aug. 9, 2019
5:47 PM
SACRAMENTO —

Excerpt:

California’s ambitious effort to automate voter registration at Department of Motor Vehicle offices produced almost 84,000 duplicate records and more than twice that number with political party mistakes, according to an audit released Friday by state officials.

The analysis covered just the first five months of the new “motor voter” program, which was launched in April 2018. It found a wide array of problems with the rollout of the DMV system, including a limited amount of testing as well as inconsistent and confusing lines of communication between the state agencies involved in its creation. Many of the findings align with documents discovered by the Los Angeles Times in an investigation earlier this year of the motor voter program.

Auditors reviewed more than 3 million voter registration files, comparing records from both DMV and California’s secretary of state. They found 83,684 duplicate voter registrations, a mistake attributed to inconsistencies in what was listed for voters’ political party preferences.

“This action resulted in no impact to voter eligibility,” Keely Martin Bosler, director of the state Department of Finance, wrote in a letter on Friday to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Cabinet secretary.

Separately, the audit found additional errors in voter registration related to party preference. Investigators wrote that 171,145 DMV records contained entries indicating a person’s political party but no such “associated designation” within the data received by state elections officials.

“These errors added additional workload to state and local elections officials, as registration records impacted by these errors had to be researched, corrected, and in some cases canceled,” Secretary of State Alex Padilla said in a letter to Bosler on Friday. He said the mistakes “threatened to undermine public confidence in the program.”

Amy Tong, the director of the California Department of Technology and a key leader of the project, insisted the audit found no actual errors. In a written statement, she called the problems “expected differences resulting from architectural differences” between the database systems used by Padilla’s office and the DMV.

An independent accounting firm, Ernst & Young, conducted the audit. Although released to the public on Friday, the report was submitted to state officials in stages between February and July, documents show. Department of Finance officials said the delayed release was necessary for them to review the findings and determine the extent of the problems.

California’s motor voter system was created through a 2015 state law designed to make it easier for more citizens to register. While the DMV has provided voter registration services for some two decades, that program was voluntary. The new state system, which uses a touch-screen system in DMV offices, is intended to register any eligible Californian unless the person opts out of the process.

Duplicate voter registration documents were first reported by The Times within a month of the DMV system’s launch. Local elections officials have said that the errors were caught and corrected, and that those voters were not allowed to cast more than one ballot. But Padilla’s office did find half a dozen voters — registered through the new system — who cast ballots even though there was incomplete information about their actual eligibility. A spokeswoman for Padilla said that none of those voters are people with a driver’s license but in the U.S. illegally.

*snip*

Full Article
0

#2 User is online   Noclevermoniker 

  • Wire Dachsies Matter
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 17,103
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 10 August 2019 - 01:12 AM

Just think of it...84,000 outliers.
0

#3 User is offline   Howsithangin 

  • The more ppl I meet, the more I like my cats
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,819
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 10 August 2019 - 01:14 AM

View PostLiz, on 10 August 2019 - 12:52 AM, said:


Amy Tong, the director of the California Department of Technology and a key leader of the project, insisted the audit found no actual errors. In a written statement, she called the problems “expected differences resulting from architectural differences” between the database systems used by Padilla’s office and the DMV.


That there is called nuance
0

#4 User is offline   Currahee! 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 2,204
  • Joined: 21-April 04

Posted 10 August 2019 - 04:52 AM

The only way to the White House in 2020 for the Democrats is to cheat.....you have just seen how they will do it. Was it Baltimore or Philly where Trump received NO votes at all?
0

#5 User is offline   Wag-a-Muffin (D) 

  • Still clinging bitterly. . .
  • View blog
  • Group: Blog Moderator
  • Posts: 19,664
  • Joined: 03-November 04

Posted 10 August 2019 - 06:34 AM

It doesn't even have to be "intentional cheating." It's just bureaucratic laziness. We still get absentee ballots for some of our children every election. We have informed the sender that those kids don't even live in the State any longer, but they keep sending them.

(And no. If you're curious, we don't vote with them.)
0

#6 User is offline   Rock N' Roll Right Winger 

  • Pissing off all of the right people
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 31,003
  • Joined: 14-October 03

Posted 10 August 2019 - 06:48 AM

Yet not one person that was responsible for all of this deliberate voter fraud has ever been held accountable for these crimes?
0

#7 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,502
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 10 August 2019 - 07:03 AM

Quote

Amy Tong, the director of the California Department of Technology and a key leader of the project, insisted the audit found no actual errors. In a written statement, she called the problems “expected differences resulting from architectural differences” between the database systems used by Padilla’s office and the DMV.


Which is textbook doublespeak from someone trying to deflect attention to the fact that fraud occurred and the systems in place aided in it happening... purposely.
0

#8 User is offline   johnnybravo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 3,876
  • Joined: 16-July 03

Posted 10 August 2019 - 07:15 AM

If you add in the 171,000 voter party preference errors you get an error rate of 8.5%. Extrapolated over a population of 39.56 million you get the potential of over 3 million voter registration errors. How many House seats flipped in 2018? Hmmmm
0

#9 User is offline   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,489
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 10 August 2019 - 08:07 AM

[]leftist] But voter fraud DOESN'T exist. You're just a bunch of racists! [/leftist]
0

#10 User is offline   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,156
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 10 August 2019 - 10:50 AM

View PostNoclevermoniker, on 10 August 2019 - 01:12 AM, said:

Just think of it...84,000 outliers.


out of 3 million attempts! Hell that's just a small fraction of the overall fraud in California.
0

#11 User is offline   RibeyeSteak 

  • Till We Meet Again
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 3,236
  • Joined: 16-January 04

Posted 10 August 2019 - 12:48 PM

View PostRedSoloCup, on 10 August 2019 - 08:07 AM, said:

[]leftist] But voter fraud DOESN'T exist. You're just a bunch of racists! [/leftist]


Exactly. We've been repeatedly lectured by our resident dope that voter fraud is a problem that doesn't exist.
0

#12 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,299
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 10 August 2019 - 12:56 PM

View PostHowsithangin, on 10 August 2019 - 01:14 AM, said:

That there is called nuance

Well, being CA, they’d vote D anyway, whether they want to or not.
0

#13 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,299
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 10 August 2019 - 01:20 PM

View Postjohnnybravo, on 10 August 2019 - 07:15 AM, said:

If you add in the 171,000 voter party preference errors you get an error rate of 8.5%. Extrapolated over a population of 39.56 million you get the potential of over 3 million voter registration errors. How many House seats flipped in 2018? Hmmmm

Well they WERE stated to be “expected differences resulting from architectural differences”, so that’s all it is: expected differences.

Which, in plain English is.... intentional fraud.

This post has been edited by zurg: 10 August 2019 - 01:20 PM

0

#14 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 57,799
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 10 August 2019 - 02:52 PM

View PostNoclevermoniker, on 10 August 2019 - 01:12 AM, said:

Just think of it...84,000 outliers.


And that's just the 84,000 they found. Don't forget, voter fraud is just like c*ckroaches: For every one you find, there are a hundred more you can't see.

B)
0

#15 User is offline   mliff1 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Community-Supported
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 05-May 14

Posted 14 August 2019 - 10:37 AM

View PostMontyPython, on 10 August 2019 - 02:52 PM, said:

And that's just the 84,000 they found. Don't forget, voter fraud is just like c*ckroaches: For every one you find, there are a hundred more you can't see.

B)


Exactly! Say it isn't so....I've talked to several liberals I work with and they laugh at me and say there's no truth to this.
0

#16 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 57,799
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 14 August 2019 - 01:21 PM

View Postmliff1, on 14 August 2019 - 10:37 AM, said:

Exactly! Say it isn't so....I've talked to several liberals I work with and they laugh at me and say there's no truth to this.


Then they aren't liberals - They're leftists, as proven by their deliberately self-imposed blinders.

B)
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users