RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Federal Judge Blasts State Department Lawyers in Hillary Email Case – - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Federal Judge Blasts State Department Lawyers in Hillary Email Case – Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   pepperonikkid 

  • Trucker
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 12,989
  • Joined: 03-September 03

  Posted 08 September 2019 - 09:02 AM

Federal Judge Blasts State Department Lawyers in Hillary Email Case – Warns 'No FOIA Exemption For Political Expedience'


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com
by Cristina Laila
September 6, 2019





Article:

Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch on Friday released transcript from their hearing on August 22 where Judge Royce Lamberth granted new discovery and witnesses on Hillary Clinton's email case.




Judge Lamberth, a Reagan appointee blasted State Department lawyers defending Hillary Clinton who were working to cover up her email scandal.

'There is no FOIA exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence,' Judge Lamberth said warning the government lawyers.

Judge Lamberth also lambasted the State Department lawyers when they tried to stop Judicial Watch from gathering more evidence in Hillary's case.

Via Judicial Watch:

Judge Lamberth also criticized the State Department's handling and production of Clinton's emails in this case stating, "There is no FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] exemption for political expedience, nor is there one for bureaucratic incompetence."

In the beginning of their oral arguments, lawyers for the State Department wrongfully stated that Judicial Watch could no longer continue their discovery. The court stopped their arguments saying that Judicial Watch can continue to find more evidence in this case:

STATE DEPARTMENT: … it is, of course, Judicial Watch's burden to explain to Your Honor why there has been good cause to reopen discovery now that discovery has closed in this case.

THE COURT: Well, I didn't close discovery. So your premise is wrong.

STATE DEPARTMENT: Fair enough, Your Honor. Whether you want to call it closed or not, it is still —

THE COURT: I didn't close it. I said I would have a status after they took this initial discovery, and that's what I'm doing today. I didn't close discovery.

STATE DEPARTMENT: That's right, Your Honor, but it is still Judicial Watch's —

THE COURT: So they don't need any good cause —

STATE DEPARTMENT: Whether

THE COURT: — Today the good cause continues from whether or not State was acting in good faith, and I'll tell you everything they've discovered in this period raises serious questions about what the hell the State Department's doing here.



Full Story

0

#2 User is offline   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,285
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 08 September 2019 - 09:40 AM

In other words the deep actors at State are still carrying HRC water and protecting her from her illegal actions. Burn that damn place down.
0

#3 User is offline   Squirrel 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 1,165
  • Joined: 24-September 18

Posted 08 September 2019 - 05:53 PM

Oops was Russia involved did they frame her? Was there interference, did they frame her? We’re russian hammers found next to her phones and hard drives. Was it trump framing her along with the Russians. Certainly someone on the left can explain.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users