RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: Obama CIA Director John Brennan Is DONE – He’s Been Caught - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Obama CIA Director John Brennan Is DONE – He’s Been Caught Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 36,622
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 06 November 2019 - 02:22 PM

Obama CIA Director John Brennan Is DONE – He's Been Caught
November 4, 2019
Martin Walsh
ExplainLife

<More Bad News For democrats Here>

We have all been wondering for quite some time if and when we would see some of the Obama officials involved in the Deep State coup against President Donald Trump brought to justice, and that day may be closer than ever before. Attorney General William Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham are investigating the origins of the Russia investigation, and things have already gotten very interesting. Last week, we learned that Durham shifted the probe into a criminal inquiry, meaning corrupt Obama-era officials could be held accountable.

Now, reports have surfaced that Durham is "very interested" in subpoenaing former intelligence officials James Clapper and John Brennan to testify. Durham wouldn't be on the verge of subpoenaing Clapper and Brennan — especially after making the investigation criminal — if he didn't have evidence of wrongdoing. Sources have stated that once that report is made public, it will be made very clear why the "origins" investigation being handled by Durham is now a criminal matter. That is horrible news for high-ranking members of the Obama administration, the intelligence community, and the former president himself.

Breitbart reported, "According to a source familiar with the situation, Brennan has received word from his attorney that he may be contacted by Durham's office, but Clapper has received no such communication at this time."

There was already considerable speculation that both Brennan and Clapper were somehow involved. Both Brennan and Clapper have made it clear they loathe Trump, and it's obvious to many they likely played a big role in bending the rules to investigate Trump and push bogus Russia collusion hoaxes.

Barr and Durham shifting their investigation into the origins of the Russia probe into a criminal inquiry is a big deal. This means that Barr and Durham now have the power to subpoena for witness testimony and documents, to convene a grand jury, and to file criminal charges. That's huge because it signals that Barr and Durham found evidence that Obama officials may have broken the law in the Russia investigation and spying on Trump. Illegally spying on Trump's campaign in an effort to take down him down is nothing short of treason, and it seems like certain Obama officials may actually get charged.

It certainly appears that Barr and Durham have already found evidence of criminal wrongdoing regarding the FBI's surveillance of the Trump campaign in 2016.

(snip)

<More Bad News For democrats Here>
0

#2 User is online   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,394
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 06 November 2019 - 03:14 PM

"Bailiff, wack his PP!"
0

#3 User is online   Taggart Transcontinental 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,774
  • Joined: 22-October 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 03:44 PM

Least corrupt administration EVAH!!!!

Yeah right. Most corrupt group of bandits ever. Everything they claim Trump did they had already done. Go Figure!

0

#4 User is offline   Mrdirt73 

  • Not everyone gets to be an astronaut when they grow up.
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 4,851
  • Joined: 19-August 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 04:09 PM

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'm not holding my breath.
0

#5 User is offline   Moderator T 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 37,609
  • Joined: 02-October 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 05:11 PM

View PostMrdirt73, on 06 November 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'm not holding my breath.

Yeah, nothing will come of this if true
0

#6 User is online   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,394
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 06 November 2019 - 05:42 PM

View PostMrdirt73, on 06 November 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'm not holding my breath.


:yeahthat:
0

#7 User is offline   Rock N' Roll Right Winger 

  • Pissing off all of the right people
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 31,984
  • Joined: 14-October 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 05:45 PM

View PostMrdirt73, on 06 November 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'm not holding my breath.

:yeahthat:
0

#8 User is offline   erp 

  • Undead Undead Undead
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 38,184
  • Joined: 29-November 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 09:21 PM

View PostMrdirt73, on 06 November 2019 - 04:09 PM, said:

I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, I'm not holding my breath.

0

#9 User is offline   Bookdoc 

  • Daddy's little girl
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 5,249
  • Joined: 07-September 05

Posted 06 November 2019 - 09:36 PM

View PostModerator T, on 06 November 2019 - 05:11 PM, said:

Yeah, nothing will come of this if true

Unfortunately, I agree with the sentiment... :yeahthat:
0

#10 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 29,152
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 06 November 2019 - 10:18 PM

1. Democrat crimes on Russia collusion are not in question.
2. What is in question, part 1: will any of these Obama top officials be charged?
3. What is in question, part 2: will any of them say anything other than “I plead the fifth” or plain refuse to testify?
4. What is in question, part 3: will any of them end up in a jury trial?
5. What is in question, part 4: will any of them actually be convicted?

My guess to #2: likely no, maybe yes.
My guess to #3-5 (if #2 is yes): no, no and no.

Because the swamp.
0

#11 User is online   AntonToo 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 15,498
  • Joined: 28-September 04

Posted 06 November 2019 - 11:28 PM

View Postzurg, on 06 November 2019 - 10:18 PM, said:

1. Democrat crimes on Russia collusion are not in question.
2. What is in question, part 1: will any of these Obama top officials be charged?
3. What is in question, part 2: will any of them say anything other than “I plead the fifth” or plain refuse to testify?
4. What is in question, part 3: will any of them end up in a jury trial?
5. What is in question, part 4: will any of them actually be convicted?

My guess to #2: likely no, maybe yes.
My guess to #3-5 (if #2 is yes): no, no and no.

Because the swamp.


There is of course a much simpler explanation. One that does not require a grand conspiracy involving Republicans and Trump's DOJ secretly covering up for Obama administration crimes for three years.

That explanation is: For all the rhetoric and bluster in the righting bubble, YOU'VE GOT NOTHING YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE TO COURT.

You will reject it, because the thought of admitting that Obama's administration was NOT criminal is just too emotionally upsetting.
0

#12 User is online   gravelrash 

  • I wish they all were punk rock girls
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 15,888
  • Joined: 24-June 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 11:38 PM

The lie of a joke just writes himself.
0

#13 User is offline   Noclevermoniker 

  • Wire Dachsies Matter
  • Group: +Silver Community Supporter
  • Posts: 17,407
  • Joined: 13-November 03

Posted 06 November 2019 - 11:58 PM

View PostAntonToo, on 06 November 2019 - 11:28 PM, said:

There is of course a much simpler explanation. One that does not require a grand conspiracy involving Republicans and Trump's DOJ secretly covering up for Obama administration crimes for three years.

That explanation is: For all the rhetoric and bluster in the righting bubble, YOU'VE GOT NOTHING YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE TO COURT.

You will reject it, because the thought of admitting that Obama's administration was NOT criminal is just too emotionally upsetting.

Stop being stupid. If you dare.
0

#14 User is offline   Howsithangin 

  • The more ppl I meet, the more I like my cats
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,594
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 07 November 2019 - 12:07 AM

View PostBookdoc, on 06 November 2019 - 09:36 PM, said:

Unfortunately, I agree with the sentiment... :yeahthat:

:verymad: :yeahthat:
0

#15 User is offline   Howsithangin 

  • The more ppl I meet, the more I like my cats
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 28,594
  • Joined: 07-March 08

Posted 07 November 2019 - 12:09 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 06 November 2019 - 11:28 PM, said:

There is of course a much simpler explanation. One that does not require a grand conspiracy involving Republicans and Trump's DOJ secretly covering up for Obama administration crimes for three years.

That explanation is: For all the rhetoric and bluster in the righting bubble, YOU'VE GOT NOTHING YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE TO COURT.

You will reject it, because the thought of admitting that Obama's administration was NOT criminal is just too emotionally upsetting.


Again I have to wonder if you actually believe the BS that you type.

I'm still 50/50 on whether you are indeed that stupid/obtuse, or just a hyperpartisan hack and pathological liar.

I'd love to post those Too options as an RN poll, but I doubt it would be permitted.
0

#16 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 59,110
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 07 November 2019 - 12:21 AM

View PostHowsithangin, on 07 November 2019 - 12:09 AM, said:

Again I have to wonder if you actually believe the BS that you type.

I'm still 50/50 on whether you are indeed that stupid/obtuse, or just a hyperpartisan hack and pathological liar.

I'd love to post those Too options as an RN poll, but I doubt it would be permitted.


Just make sure to include the third option: Both.

B)
0

#17 User is offline   Natural Selection 

  • Decrypt the truth
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 18,498
  • Joined: 31-December 03

Posted 07 November 2019 - 01:10 AM

View PostRedSoloCup, on 06 November 2019 - 03:14 PM, said:

"Bailiff, wack his PP!"


You're showing your age. :lol:

(I recognized that C&C reference right away)
0

#18 User is offline   Natural Selection 

  • Decrypt the truth
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 18,498
  • Joined: 31-December 03

Posted 07 November 2019 - 01:15 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 06 November 2019 - 11:28 PM, said:

There is of course a much simpler explanation. One that does not require a grand conspiracy involving Republicans and Trump's DOJ secretly covering up for Obama administration crimes for three years.

That explanation is: For all the rhetoric and bluster in the righting bubble, YOU'VE GOT NOTHING YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE TO COURT.

You will reject it, because the thought of admitting that Obama's administration was NOT criminal is just too emotionally upsetting.


This...coming from someone who thinks Trump colluded with Russia and Obamacare is revenue neutral.

:biglaugh:
0

#19 User is online   RedSoloCup 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 6,394
  • Joined: 05-June 15

Posted 07 November 2019 - 05:52 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 06 November 2019 - 11:28 PM, said:

There is of course a much simpler explanation. One that does not require a grand conspiracy involving Republicans and Trump's DOJ secretly covering up for Obama administration crimes for three years.

That explanation is: For all the rhetoric and bluster in the righting bubble, YOU'VE GOT NOTHING YOU CAN ACTUALLY TAKE TO COURT.

You will reject it, because the thought of admitting that Obama's administration was NOT criminal is just too emotionally upsetting.


:bs:

View PostNatural Selection, on 07 November 2019 - 01:10 AM, said:

You're showing your age. :lol:

(I recognized that C&C reference right away)


:lol:

View PostNatural Selection, on 07 November 2019 - 01:15 AM, said:

This...coming from someone who thinks Trump colluded with Russia and Obamacare is revenue neutral.

:biglaugh:


:exactly:
0

#20 User is offline   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 29,152
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 07 November 2019 - 06:27 AM

View PostAntonToo, on 06 November 2019 - 11:28 PM, said:

There is of course a much simpler explanation. One that does not require a grand conspiracy involving Republicans and Trump's DOJ secretly covering up for Obama administration crimes for three years.

That’s another tired old line. The whole point about the Deep State is that it hasn’t been “Trump’s DoJ” for three years. The whole point is that it’s career bureaucrats (like you) who are leftist because you believe your income depends on being democrat and having a large government. People like YOU are the anti-Trump Deep State Swamp.

I know you’ll make some inane protestations but that won’t change the truth. And voters are “woke”.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users