News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

RightNation.US: SD Senate Bill 103 proposes hiding election results until December - RightNation.US

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

SD Senate Bill 103 proposes hiding election results until December Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   MTP Reggie 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: +Gold Community Supporter
  • Posts: 37,537
  • Joined: 13-January 04

Posted 12 February 2020 - 02:46 PM

Senate Bill 103 proposes hiding election results until December. Which is the opposite of open government.
Posted on February 11, 2020
by Pat Powers
Dakota War College

<More Here>

Did anyone else catch this in the Rapid City Journal this morning? Apparently a measure has been introduced and actually passed out of committee to hide the election results of the November election from South Dakota taxpayers until the middle of December:

The number of votes cast in the general election for president would remain a secret until the Electoral College does its work, according to a bill that was endorsed Monday morning by the Senate State Affairs Committee.


Passing SB103 would protect the Electoral College, according to Stalzer.

"This is a small way we can slow down, delay or even prevent the National Popular Vote (Interstate Compact) from undoing what the founders so carefully put together," Stalzer said.

Read that here.

No. Absolutely not. I'm shocked that anyone would even consider limiting open government and the public's right to know in this manner. Are we that far gone that we choose to live in fear by hiding information from the voters who cast the ballots?

While the news story doesn't mention it, the electoral college meets the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December. The bill literally calls for the results of the South Dakota election to be hidden for over a month.

If we're that scared of the National Popular Vote scheme which I agree is a concept exceedingly harmful to our state we already have a remedy. The court system. We can certainly bring a lawsuit to contest the act as unconstitutional, as it most certainly would be contested.


<More Here>

#2 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 29,506
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 12 February 2020 - 04:12 PM

Now they're being open about being shady...

#3 User is offline   Rock N' Roll Right Winger 

  • Pissing off all of the right people
  • Group: Silver
  • Posts: 33,276
  • Joined: 14-October 03

Posted 12 February 2020 - 06:09 PM

It's straight up nothing but a a means to cheat.

This gives them time to fabricate and manipulate the outcome and spin up enough lies to sell it to the gullible masses.

Whoever proposed this underhanded crap ought to be hanged.

It's gotta be a democrap?

This post has been edited by Rock N' Roll Right Winger: 12 February 2020 - 06:16 PM


#4 User is offline   ASE 

  • You do NOT have a right to NOT BE OFFENDED!!
  • View gallery
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 8,109
  • Joined: 15-June 03

Posted 12 February 2020 - 07:41 PM

They will all vote by secret ballot; you hand them a sealed ballot to drop in the voting machine. If they ask who they are voting for, tell them it is a secret because that is what a 'secret ballot' is. They first have to vote, to find out whose name is on the ballot.

Share this topic:

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users