Jump to content
To change color scheme, click on themes at bottom of page ×
RightNation.US
Sign in to follow this  
Liz

Exclusive–Facebook Apologizes, Restores Previously Censored Ad

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Liz

Exclusive–Facebook Apologizes, Restores Previously Censored Ad Promoting Marsha Blackburn

 

Breitbart

By Sean Moran

1 Nov 2018

 

Excerpt:

 

Facebook told Breitbart News in an exclusive statement on Thursday that they have restored a Susan B. Anthony List ad promoting Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and apologized, contending that the ad did not violate their advertising policy, which raises questions over social media companies’ influence in American electoral politics.

 

On Thursday, Facebook decided not to approve one of Susan B. Anthony List’s ads within one week of the contentious 2018 midterm elections, which raises the question of social media companies’ undue influence in American electoral politics. The Susan B. Anthony List ad chastises Tennessee Senate Democrat candidate Phil Bredesen for his pro-choice views, while also promoting Tennessee Republican Blackburn as a “pro-life champion.”

 

Here is the ad:

 

BREAKING: This morning Facebook banned our 30-second ad exposing pro-abortion @PhilBredesen in Tennessee and supporting #ProLife Marsha Blackburn for Senate.

 

Watch the ad Facebook censored: pic.twitter.com/BHlklKqD0Q#TNSen @VoteMarsha #IVoteProLife✅

 

— Susan B. Anthony List (@SBAList) November 1, 2018

Facebook responded to Breitbart News’s request for comment on Thursday, explaining that the ad should have never been disapproved and that they have restored the Susan B. Anthony List ad.

 

“This ad does not violate Facebook’s policies and should never have been disapproved,” a Facebook spokesperson told Breitbart News. “We’re sorry for this mistake – the ad has been restored and is now running on Facebook.”

 

Facebook has yet to respond to followup requests for comment over why the ad was disapproved in the first place and what safeguards they can put in place to ensure that conservative and alternative political and issue ads do not get censored.

 

Facebook’s original disapproval of the Susan B. Anthony List ad strikes a contrast to Facebook Chief Operating Officer (COO) Sheryl Sandberg’s statement that she would not ban ads that have pro-life views, despite her own pro-choice beliefs and support for Planned Parenthood.

 

Sandberg asked rhetorically, “The question is, ‘Should divisive political or issue ads run?’”

 

The Facebook executive answered, “Our answer is yes–because when you cut off speech for one person, you cut off speech for all people”:

 

This is especially disappointing after Facebook's @sherylsandberg was specifically asked what she thought of Twitter banning @VoteMarsha's #ProLife ad and she said Facebook would NOT do that. Watch Sandberg's comments: pic.twitter.com/nzIDgZKgEP

 

— Susan B. Anthony List (@SBAList) November 1, 2018

The drama over the Susan B. Anthony ad comes on the heels of Google’s refusing to air a Tennessee Republican Party ad supporting Blackburn for Senate on Wednesday. In October 2017, Twitter blocked a pro-life Blackburn for Senate ad, claiming the ad was “inflammatory.”

 

Silicon Valley’s disapproval and refusal to air ads they consider “inflammatory” raises the question over the significant influence Google, Facebook, and Twitter play in America’s elections, especially considering this scandal arose within one week of the contentious 2018 midterm elections.

 

Despite the censorship looming over Blackburn’s campaign, she has continued to lead in the polls. An Emerson College poll released on Thursday has Blackburn leading Democrat Bredesen by eight points—52 to 44 percent. Blackburn’s lead remains well beyond the survey’s three percent margin of error.

 

*snip*

 

Full Article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Censport

Meanwhile, YouTube, Hulu, and Twitter are packed with anti-Blackburn, pro-Bredesen ads. Leftist media never makes "mistakes" against their own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
donsaliman

I know that the heads of the FaceBook site are liberals and act like liberals when blocking a person, but also, anyone on Facebook without the bosses knowing could block anyone they want.

 

It also has double standards, for when a liberal says "boo" it is not blocked, but when a conservative says "boo" they say it does not fit under our rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moderator T

Someone needs to sue FB for violating election laws. This one sided censorship needs to be called what it is: a substantial financial contribution to Democrat campaigns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...