Jump to content
To change color scheme, click on themes at bottom of page ×
Sign in to follow this  

NYT Makes Changes To Election Needle

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

NYT Makes Changes To Election Needle So Readers Won’t Get Upset


The Daily Caller

6:18 PM 11/05/2018 | Elections

Chris White | Energy Reporter




The New York Times is changing a voting data graphic that many readers claim led them to falsely believe then-candidate Donald Trump would lose the 2016 presidential election in a landslide.


TheNYT is working to avoid triggering panic attacks among people who felt the election needle duped them into believing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would easily win. The needle supposedly created confusion between real-life election data and flawed predictive polling.


“Until we get a sufficient sampling of early results to make that model meaningful, we won’t even surface the needle,” Managing Editor Joe Kahn told Vanity Fair’s Joe Pompeo Monday. There will now be two needles – one for the House and one for the Senate – and neither will be placed high up on the front page, he said.


“People have expressed a concern that even though our real-time election model is extremely valuable, that despite that, we should still be very cautious about featuring the needle prominently in our coverage on Election Night—not because we’re not confident in it, but because certain readers may have a nervous reaction to the re-introduction of the needle,” he added.


TheNYT’s needle initially showed Clinton with an 85 percent chance of victory, but then the needle began lurching toward Trump, one editor told Pompeo. “[Y]ou could tell who was watching, because they were the ones who started getting distraught … There were people crying in the newsroom that night,” the person said.





:dramaqueen: :tantrum: :rofl: :rofl:



Adult sized toddlers. :nuts:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Wag-a-Muffin (D)

I was watching Alton Brown (Good Eats) last night and an ad for the New York Times newest Trump expose came on. Since I hadn't taped the show I couldn't zip through the ad. It was so repulsive I taped the remaining show and turned off the set.


Rhetorical question: How many exposes (?) did the Times do on Clinton, or Obama?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...