Jump to content
To change color scheme, click on themes at bottom of page ×
RightNation.US
Sign in to follow this  
Moderator T

White House proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Squirrel

So if we can’t send them to North Dakota lady bird, how many can you house, feed and are willing to take care of and shelter. It’s not super humane but I think you can put 4-5 per room. That’s way better then the cages at the border. Or maybe you can just pay for even 1 room indefinitely at a long stay hotel for one and include room service so they eat. I mean you like sanctuary city laws, you don’t want them treated as garbage. I’m sure if you expect America to pay for them all you have no problem paying for a few and leading by example. But that is as likely to happen as you answering questions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RedSoloCup

When has North Dakota defied Federal law and refuse to enforce immigration laws? There is "lots of elbow" room in California. 167k square miles to 71k. That is more than twice as much area AND California officials have bragged numerous times about how proud they are for defying Federal law.

 

Your suggestion is stupid and hypocritical. In other words, typical of a leftist.

 

By the way, "Trump's base" are American citizens, not 'deplorable', they should not be ignored because you are pitching a fit because you didn't get your way. You certainly do not qualify for that kind of pretentious and elitist attitude. You are no better than anyone else.

 

 

Why when Kalifornia finally gets their just desserts and falls into the Pacific I will be sleeping 200x better at night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rock N' Roll Right Winger

Why Canada? They didn’t vote against him.

 

Human beings used as petty retaliation for opposing Trump and his asylum hating pit bull, Stephen Miller immigration plans. Truly scum. He says as much in his tweet.Forget about making the job of ICE even more difficult, what will be their legal status?

Why the hell not Canada?

 

Home of Jim Carrey and many other foaming at the mouth proggy celebritards?

Edited by Rock N' Roll Right Winger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RedSoloCup

:exactly:

 

Which is why these illegals all need to be bussed right into these sanctuary cities and live right in the very neighborhoods with these democrap progtards, camping right in their back yards, littering defecating and breaking into their homes and property to have a good ol' time with the likes of Governor Moonbeam, Bella Pelosi, Frankenfienstein, Chuckie Schumer, etc.

 

:yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rock N' Roll Right Winger

Why not Canada, if we're just making up places to send them?

 

I honestly don't understand how sending these folks to the places who've expressed a desire to have them is "truly scum".

 

I really wish you guys would make up your minds here. Trump wants a wall to stop them from coming, for which, your side calls him a Nazi. So, he detains them when they come in, which he is called a dictator who is inhumane. Now if he ships them to areas who have actually passed laws to protect these folks, he's scum.

 

I'm starting to think it really doesn't matter what he does.

DING DING DING!

 

WE HAVE A WINNER!!!! :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stick

If I was Trump, I think I would just say, "Look, America, Democrats want sanctuary cities but don't want the consequences of dealing with those people and their own immigration policies. So we're going to be sending these illegal immigrants to NON sanctuary cities and states near YOU - and I don't think anything would make our friends on the left more happy. Be sure to thank your local Democrat politician and tell them what you think of their policies when you're in the voting booths in next year's election!!!"

Edited by stick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rock N' Roll Right Winger

If I was Trump, I think I would just say, "Look, America, Democrats want sanctuary cities but don't want the consequences of dealing with those people and their own immigration policies. So we're going to be sending these illegal immigrants to NON sanctuary cities and states near YOU - and I don't think anything would make our friends on the left more happy. Be sure to thank your local Democrat politician and tell them what you think of their policies when you're in the voting booths in next year's election!!!"

Reminds me of an old Don Martin cartoon from Mad magazine back in the 70's:

 

tumblr_n731hrGQha1tqkdvno1_1280.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gravelrash

If I was Trump, I think I would just say, "Look, America, Democrats want sanctuary cities but don't want the consequences of dealing with those people and their own immigration policies. So we're going to be sending these illegal immigrants to NON sanctuary cities and states near YOU - and I don't think anything would make our friends on the left more happy. Be sure to thank your local Democrat politician and tell them what you think of their policies when you're in the voting booths in next year's election!!!"

 

He doesn't have to say it. The Democrats did in their reaction. This is a yuuuuuuge win. Now all we have to wait for is Congressional Republicans to f' it up and cave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
helton

The NY Times has an article on the subject and the comments section is always the best part of the articles. I am battling my liberal brethren in the comments section as "helton." My initial comment was named a "Times Pick." :thumbsup:

 

It's remarkable to read the usual liberal comments that Trump is mean/cruel/dictator, etc. But, no one has successfully rebutted my point, as others have made here, that Trump is just giving sanctuary cities what they want - thousands of illegals all at once instead of a little bit at a time.

 

Of course, since they can't rebut the facts, they are reduced to name calling and tossing insults around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zurg

"Petty retaliation"? Looks like someone slipped from NIMBY to bipolar on the immigration issue. The real reason why these sanctuary cities are all in huff is because they're "full". They cannot take the strain of any more illegals. That, and they do want these illegals to be shipped to North Dakota.

 

Illegals are already concentrated in Democrat / regressive districts. They need to be settled in more Republican / freedom-loving areas in order to outbreed and outvote the opposition. If we were to get rid of the Electoral College, places like Oakland and Chicago would be fighting over who gets to herd the illegals into their backyard.

Bingo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MontyPython

Why not Canada, if we're just making up places to send them?

 

I honestly don't understand how sending these folks to the places who've expressed a desire to have them is "truly scum".

 

I really wish you guys would make up your minds here. Trump wants a wall to stop them from coming, for which, your side calls him a Nazi. So, he detains them when they come in, which he is called a dictator who is inhumane. Now if he ships them to areas who have actually passed laws to protect these folks, he's scum.

 

I'm starting to think it really doesn't matter what he does.

 

Of course it doesn't matter what Trump does or doesn't do. The spoiled infants who make up the left are just proving (AGAIN) what spoiled infants they are. You know all the old jokes: "If he walked on water they'd just declare he can't swim"..."If he cured cancer they'd just declare he puts doctors out of work"...etc etc etc. And so it is again: They openly and proudly flout the law and declare "sanctuary" for illegal aliens, but when Trump suggest sending illegal aliens to those very same "sanctuaries", somehow he's the bad guy.

 

No surprise. Leftists have always been hypocrites, liars, childish, etc. Everybody knows it. And everybody also knows these standard leftist characteristics kicked into warp 5 after Nov. 2016. They simply have no intention whatsoever of treating Trump fairly, honestly, or objectively. They never will, because they'll never grow up.

 

 

 

 

But I can't help noticing nobody has addressed BootsieBets' excellent point way back in post #12:

 

Excuse me, but I live in a sanctuary city – not because I want to, and I will be moving as soon as I can retire and get the heck out of here. But in the mean time, please don’t assume that you are punishing the correct people by sending us more illegals. It is the law abiding, hard working, conservatives who didn’t vote for the Marxist, progressive, champagne socialist politicians in charge that end up suffering. My neighborhood is being overwhelmed by “dayworkers” waiting for the trucks that pick them up to go to constructions sites and we are are seeing more crime in our area all the time.

 

I understand and agree. WA state is a "sanctuary" state too, and NOT because I voted for it. I'm not so much worried about myself; I can take care of myself. But my elderly mother lives in Seattle, and she didn't vote for this submoronic leftist policy either. It makes my blood boil thinking about her alone in her apartment surrounded by criminals who are being "protected" by leftists who apparently hate America.

 

<_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squirrel

Simpler easier question to answer ladybird. Do you think they just need to be released? Where do you think they need to be released to? Do you think they need to show up to thier court dates? If so how do we track them? Do you think anyone that shows up at the border with a kid should be released with them or just parents? If just parents do you think we should check if they are parents or sex traffickers? How do you propose to ensure the saftey of the kids while we determine its not sex trafficking? Answer how to do any of those things and give your opinions. I’m open to conversation on any and all of them from any of our left members. But I know questions and thinking are hard when you don’t have talking points. It would be nice for 1 person to try and answer 1 question though

Edited by Squirrel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squirrel

The sad thing is if republicans had a spine and played things right. Then yes it’s a win truth normally wins out. But republicans always act like scared dogs. First time someone yells they back peddle. Odds are the same on them throwing away a win as a democrat telling the truth. I think that’s why trump scares them both he doesn’t care and doesn’t back down. Some of the republicans should take notes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Severian

So, Trump is a racist Nazi when he says "The US is full" but sanctuary city/state Democrats who say "were not gonna take them, we're, ahem, full" are just pointing out Trump is evil. The irony and hypocrisy is so thick it bends light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zurg

So, Trump is a racist Nazi when he says "The US is full" but sanctuary city/state Democrats who say "were not gonna take them, we're, ahem, full" are just pointing out Trump is evil. The irony and hypocrisy is so thick it bends light.

We need that picture of a black hole! (I’m not talking the one belonging to Biden, let me just make that clear...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Squirrel

Again it’s just a question of we all agree there is an issue. Now left or right how do you think we should solve it? Then how do you think it should be paid for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kestrel

Excuse me, but I live in a sanctuary city – not because I want to, and I will be moving as soon as I can retire and get the heck out of here. But in the mean time, please don’t assume that you are punishing the correct people by sending us more illegals. It is the law abiding, hard working, conservatives who didn’t vote for the Marxist, progressive, champagne socialist politicians in charge that end up suffering. My neighborhood is being overwhelmed by “dayworkers” waiting for the trucks that pick them up to go to constructions sites and we are are seeing more crime in our area all the time.

 

Maybe it would be fun to go out into your 'hood and hand out right wing propaganda..you know what I mean...like constitutions and bill of rights pamplets..and how the these people are being conned by the same Socialist POS's that they left their country to escape..in my experience the Mexicans that I know are all staunch Conservatives after they've been here awhile

 

Kestrel...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kestrel

Oh my, somebody has come down with a case of NIMBY.

 

Yeah...a strange kind though doncha think?..A sort of...Racial NIMBY do you suppose that these are the wrong..er..well "C" of the infamous POC?...

 

Kestrel...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kestrel

Not in my backyard. People who are all for "sanctuary cities" and homeless shelters but want them placed as far away from them as possible. The species is closely related to the Limousine Liberal.

 

MasterCard Marxist?

 

Kestrel...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AntiObama

Trump is simply building bridges to the sanctuary cities. :)

 

5c5acf2bdfa1e77e591db295-750-375.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RedSoloCup

The NY Times has an article on the subject and the comments section is always the best part of the articles. I am battling my liberal brethren in the comments section as "helton." My initial comment was named a "Times Pick." :thumbsup:

 

It's remarkable to read the usual liberal comments that Trump is mean/cruel/dictator, etc. But, no one has successfully rebutted my point, as others have made here, that Trump is just giving sanctuary cities what they want - thousands of illegals all at once instead of a little bit at a time.

 

Of course, since they can't rebut the facts, they are reduced to name calling and tossing insults around.

 

The price of dealing with brain dead libtards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ladybird

Why not Canada, if we're just making up places to send them?

 

I honestly don't understand how sending these folks to the places who've expressed a desire to have them is "truly scum".

 

I really wish you guys would make up your minds here. Trump wants a wall to stop them from coming, for which, your side calls him a Nazi. So, he detains them when they come in, which he is called a dictator who is inhumane. Now if he ships them to areas who have actually passed laws to protect these folks, he's scum.

 

I'm starting to think it really doesn't matter what he does.

 

After they get dumped in these cities Mr. Trump has a beef with, then what? Homeless families living in the streets and former detainees (some of whom are criminals) roaming free around the country. Wonderful.. This will make the job of the ICE agents even harder and spread misery all around. I understand he is frustrated, but too bad. This is the job he signed up for and punishing the constituents who live in places which he did not receive electoral votes is not part of the job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
erp

After they get dumped in these cities Mr. Trump has a beef with, then what? Homeless families living in the streets and former detainees (some of whom are criminals) roaming free around the country. Wonderful.. This will make the job of the ICE agents even harder and spread misery all around. I understand he is frustrated, but too bad. This is the job he signed up for and punishing the constituents who live in places which he did not receive electoral votes is not part of the job.

Funny how you just admitted that they will be a drag on society. Why allow them to be “dumped” anywhere? Why allow them in at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rock N' Roll Right Winger

After they get dumped in these cities Mr. Trump has a beef with, then what? Homeless families living in the streets and former detainees (some of whom are criminals) roaming free around the country. Wonderful.. This will make the job of the ICE agents even harder and spread misery all around. I understand he is frustrated, but too bad. This is the job he signed up for and punishing the constituents who live in places which he did not receive electoral votes is not part of the job.

:biglaugh:

 

:violin:

 

Well then if it's so bad living in the proggy sanctuary, then maybe they will all go back home to Mexico?

 

How will it make ICE's job harder when they had to release them in the first place to these cities because your party made it the policy to do so? ICE had it easier when they had them all rounded up in detention to send their butts back home.

 

Funny how you just admitted that they will be a drag on society. Why allow them to be “dumped” anywhere? Why allow them in at all?

 

:exactly:

Edited by Rock N' Roll Right Winger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...