Jump to content
To change color scheme, click on themes at bottom of page ×
RightNation.US
Sign in to follow this  
pepperonikkid

The Other Half of Socialism: Independence from Our Fellow Man

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

pepperonikkid

The Other Half of Socialism: Independence from Our Fellow Man

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/

By Steven Kessler

September 16, 2020

 

Article:

 

There is a latent and relatively unknown element of socialism we've all been living through during the coronavirus lockdowns: independence from all forms of social attachment.

To properly identify this tenet of socialism, we must understand how socialism came to exist in both its modern iterations and its ideological inception.  We must look at the work and thought of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.  Rousseau is the godfather and patron saint of not just socialism, but all liberalism.

In his most celebrated work, The Social Contract (1762), Rousseau outlined his plan for the best method of governing human beings.  The name he gave his form of government is "the general will."  The general will is Rousseau's nomenclature for big government.

            One of Rousseau's goals in crafting the general will was not just dependence on the government, but independence from our fellow man.  In one of the most famous passages of The Social Contract, Rousseau wrote:

In order that the social contract shall be no empty formula it tacitly implies that obligation which alone can give force to all the others: namely that anyone who refuses obedience to the General Will is forced to do it by the whole body.  This means nothing less than he will be forced to be free.  For this is the condition which, by giving each citizen to his countrymen secures him against all personal dependence.

 Rousseau desired to free man of all dependency relationships.  If the people are not willing participants, the government will force them to be free.

A dependency relationship is not a complicated academic term.  What Rousseau meant is any relationship we have with someone else that makes any sort of dependence — depending on someone or being depended on.  He found all dependency relationships corrupting and enslaving.  Rousseau explained the problem of dependency relationships in The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (1755):

On the other hand, although man had previously been free and independent, we find him, so to speak, subject, by virtue of a multitude of fresh needs, to all of nature and particularly to his fellowmen, whose slave in a sense he becomes even in becoming their master; rich, he needs their services; poor, he needs their help; and being midway between wealth and poverty does not put him in a position to get along without them.

Dependency relations are enslaving because these relationships create obligations, and any form of obligation is upsetting to Rousseau.  Read this interpretation from Judith Shklar (a scholar of Rousseau) of Rousseau's view of dependency relationships: "He adored liberty and could endure no constraint, no discomfort and no subjugation whatsoever.  Moreover, all society was a form of enslavement for him, since it inevitably forced him to do something he did not feel like doing."  Rousseau wanted to live a life free from any obligations and duties.  He was really advocating for hedonistic self-indulgence masquerading as the quest for equity through big government.

 

 Full Story

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
grimreefer

small.DrugsRBad.jpg.b72fc2e2cc4e1948d57a

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...